- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LeBron is 28 points away from passing Jordan for most points in the playoffs all time
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:13 am to rocket31
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:13 am to rocket31
quote:
set it up so it *appears* MJ is superior, but once you dig a little deeper, the numbers clearly favor the king
Now you're just making shite up.
1
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:13 am to jangalang
quote:The competition is damn near exactly the same. Why do "game 7s" matter. Bron has the better winning pct.......
MJ never played in game 7. He didn't play garbage competition either.
quote:And 116 less shots........
It took him 32+ extra playoff games to beat MJ's scoring mark.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:14 am to lsupride87
I only read the 1st post.... 
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:14 am to jangalang
quote:No, he isnt. Bron has done it with less shots, and a better win pct
Now you're just making shite up.
The numbers strictly as it regards to points supports him
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:14 am to lsupride87
Dukke doesn't do stats. He likes to rely on nostalgia and his memory...
ETA: I take that back. He does one stat: rings.
Bradshaw > Brees
Dilfer > Marino
ETA: I take that back. He does one stat: rings.
Bradshaw > Brees
Dilfer > Marino
This post was edited on 5/25/17 at 8:33 am
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:15 am to dukke v
quote:I like your style
I only read the 1st post....
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:15 am to slackster
do people discount lebron for reaching the finals and losing when michael didnt reach the finals that many times?
losing in the second round is better than making it to the finals and losing? SOS dont understand
losing in the second round is better than making it to the finals and losing? SOS dont understand
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:15 am to spaceranger
Yes. Hence the 6-0 arguments.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:16 am to lsupride87
quote:
But it is going to take him roughly 116 less shots.......
So this is the shitty metric that you're clinging to these days.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:20 am to lsupride87
quote:
No, he isnt. Bron has done it with less shots, and a better win pct
It took Bron 210 playoff games to win three championships. STFU about winning percentage, troll.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:27 am to StrongBackWeakMind
thats dumb. making it to the finals is far more impressive than losing in the second round
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:28 am to jangalang
LeBron is 10-8 in elimination games. MJ is 6-7.
LeBron also has the better PPG, RPG and FG% in elimination games.
LeBron also has the better PPG, RPG and FG% in elimination games.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:31 am to lsupride87
quote:
No, he isnt. Bron has done it with less shots, and a better win pct
The numbers strictly as it regards to points supports him
the lengths people will go to, to avoid admitting theyre wrong
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:32 am to spaceranger
has anyone mentioned that lebrons best attribute isnt even scoring?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:33 am to nvasil1
quote:
LeBron is 10-8 in elimination games. MJ is 6-7. LeBron also has the better PPG, RPG and FG% in elimination games.
Our LeBron
Is an awesome LeBron
HE REIGNS
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:35 am to jangalang
quote:
And going to a lot of game 7's. Something Jordan didn't need to do. The LeBron jockstrap holders can eat their hearts out on this stat.
Is this a new knock on LeBron now? I've seen this alot lately and it makes no sense as a criticism. Is LeBron going to two Game 7s in the Finals, and winning both, a bad thing.
Lebron took a 73 win team to 7 games and beat them. The horror.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:35 am to PeteRose
quote:If DeAndre Jordan shot the ball 20 times per game with his 70% or whatever it is FG% then yes, he would be an all time great, actually, even if it was on mostly dunks.
My point is that if you have a high % of fgs on dunks, it doesn't make you a better player. If deandre Jordan has the same # of FG attempts as Lebronnor Jordan, he would have more point than them. But it doesn't mean he's a better than both. It's not a good gauge.
You're basically knocking LeBron for taking more high % shots. What sense does that make?
Simplest way to do this, if you're saying more of Lebron's points came on dunks and it's a higher % shot, then why didn't MJ dunk more?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:38 am to shel311
quote:
if you're saying more of Lebron's points came on dunks and it's a higher % shot, then why didn't MJ dunk more?
cmon man. when mark price Ds you up, you need to settle for the jumper
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:39 am to nvasil1
quote:
LeBron is 10-8 in elimination games
And still hasn't won half of his finals appearances. Despite the moving of the goalposts, all I see is that MJ didn't face elimination games nearly as much despite playing much tougher opponents.
GOAT
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:40 am to jangalang
quote:This post makes perfect sense as you've made it very clear you prefer players who score less points on more attempts(see Kobe more clutch than LeBron)
So this is the shitty metric that you're clinging to these days.
At least you're consistent!!!
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News