- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jerricho Cotchery's catch ruled incomplete after review - explanation?
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:45 am
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:45 am
Was there ever an explanation given after the game? Were Pereira and Mike Carey asked about this? Clete Blakeman ever say anything? I've seen little to nothing about this since the game ended.
15
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:46 am to StrongBackWeakMind
Replay officials are terrible, huge moment in the game.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:46 am to LSU Piston
You mean the obvious incompletion where the ball hits the ground, moves and then he regains control? 
Some people really are blind.
Some people really are blind.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:46 am to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:
I thought he caught it.
Me too. Was there not enough to overturn? I was confused about this for most of the game.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:47 am to LSU Piston
Horrible call that set up a game changing play. We won't hear any official explanation b/c there isn't one and it won't go along with the Manning story.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:47 am to LSU Piston
Looked like a catch to me.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:47 am to LSU Piston
The catch/no catch rule in the NFL is laughable.
Also, what's your opinion on the PI call on Norman in the endzone?
Also, what's your opinion on the PI call on Norman in the endzone?
This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 10:48 am
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:48 am to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:
I thought he caught it.
Same, but I've given up trying to guess or reason on catch rulings and reviews.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:48 am to Geauxgurt
quote:
You mean the obvious incompletion
There is nothing "obvious" about it.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:48 am to Geauxgurt
quote:
You mean the obvious incompletion where the ball hits the ground, moves and then he regains control?
quote:
Some people really are blind.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:48 am to LSU Piston
I thought it hit the ground before he rolled over
If it was called a catch on the field, it would have stood
If it was called a catch on the field, it would have stood
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:49 am to LSU Piston
quote:
Mike Carey
He declared it would be overturned and ruled a catch. He's consistently wrong though. It's crazy how often he's wrong.
There is a point where he goes to the ground and it looks like the ball MIGHT make contact with the ground. At that point the ball does come loose from his grasp for a second. My guess is that they couldn't confirm that the ball didn't hit the ground...therefore the call stands.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:49 am to JBeam
quote:Defensive holding. It was justified. He held him twice in the route.
Also, what's your opinion on the PI call on Norman in the endzone?
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:50 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
If it was called a catch on the field, it would have stood
I didn't see the play but that sounds about right
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:50 am to JBeam
quote:
Also, what's your opinion on the PI call on Norman in the endzone?
What PI? I know he got called for holding which he did.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:50 am to Geauxgurt
quote:
You mean the obvious incompletion where the ball hits the ground, moves and then he regains control?
He secured the ball with one hand toward the bottom and back of the football as he went to the ground. The front of the ball hits the ground and starts to move as he lands and rolls. That's why he's trying to re-secure the football next to his hip.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:50 am to brgfather129
quote:
There is nothing "obvious" about it.
Yes, there is. The ball is bobbled, he regains control going to the grown, it hits the ground and then moves in his grip.
The rule is that if the ball hits the ground and moves in any way, it is an incomplete pass. It was pretty straight forward.
Only people thinking there is some huge controversy will ignore it, but hey, let's not enforce the rules because the team you support was affected negatively by applying them.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:51 am to bbrownso
quote:
He secured the ball with one hand toward the bottom and back of the football as he went to the ground. The front of the ball hits the ground and starts to move as he lands and rolls. That's why he's trying to re-secure the football next to his hip.
They won't believe you.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:51 am to LSU Piston
No indisputable video evidence to indicate that the tip of the ball did not touch the ground when he first went down. Had they called it a completion on the field, they would not have overturned it either.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News