Started By
Message

re: Does the Receiver make the QB, or the QB make the receiver?

Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:01 am to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166210 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:01 am to
The O Line makes them all better.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Jerry freaking Rice ain't catching balls bounced to him.

And Peyton freaking Manning ain't completing passes to No-Hands Magee.

What's your point?
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:05 am to
Ask Robert Meachem.

Or Alvin Harper.

Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112308 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:06 am to
quote:

quote: Jerry freaking Rice ain't catching balls bounced to him. And Peyton freaking Manning ain't completing passes to No-Hands Magee.


This thread is officially stupid
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101348 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:11 am to
quote:

You can make a case for both, but I think it I had to pick one it's the WR making the QB. Look at UGA 2009 for proof.

Joe Cox was a pretty pedestrian QB, yet he set a UGA touchdowns in a season record. Why? Well, he had AJ Green to throw to. If you have a receiver that you can essentially throw the ball anywhere within about 7 yards of him and he's gonna catch it everytime, it can damn sure make a QB look good.



A burner receiver with good hands, can do a lot more for a mediocre QB in college than in the NFL.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86461 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:13 am to
quote:

A burner receiver with good hands, can do a lot more for a mediocre QB in college than in the NFL.


Right, I was just giving an example from college. In the NFL the QBs and WRs SHOULD all be fairly competent since they're playing the NFL. So a great QB like peyton can make average receivers look good. I just think it'd be easier for a great receiver to make an average QB look great.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:22 am to
quote:

And Peyton freaking Manning ain't completing passes to No-Hands Magee.


except we can assume, at least at the NFL level a base level of competence. There are not 5'8" 5.25 40 WR's that literally can't catch running around in the NFL.

I will take Peyton Manning and any set of WR's in the NFL over Arizona's WR's and QB's.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:23 am to
quote:

except we can assume, at least at the NFL level a base level of competence. There are not 5'8" 5.25 40 QB's that literally can't throw running around in the NFL
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:26 am to
quote:

I just think it'd be easier for a great receiver to make an average QB look great.


I couldn't disagree with that more. See the Arizona Cardinals. Andre Johnson did not make David Carr look great in any way. The 49er's traded for Steve Young after Montana had a back injury in 86. When he was out Rice did not make Jeff Kemp look great. The Cowboys had Irvin and Noveck the year before they drafted Aikman, how did those QB's do?
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:28 am to
quote:

genro


touche, now can you explain the Arizona Cardinals for me? They have Larry Fitzgerald, one of the best WR's in the league, their QB's are garbage.

QB is a much more important position.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30100 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:29 am to
great QB's make average/underrated WR's look good.
Brees --> his receiving corp
Brady --> his receiving corp
Manning (now) --> his receiving corp

great receivers make average QB's look better
anquan boldin/torrey smith --> joe flacco

shitty qb's making great receivers look horrible
any arizona QB --> fitz
Posted by Jumbeauxlaya
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
18083 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:30 am to
quote:

quote:
Receiver make the QB


Source: Atlanta


With Atlanta's receiving core I could name 10 QB's who would break every record around.
This post was edited on 3/13/13 at 10:31 am
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101348 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:33 am to
quote:

With Atlanta's receiving core I could name 10 QB's who would break every record around.


Posted by wild877
Member since Jul 2010
390 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Chicken and egg argument.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:35 am to
quote:

They have Larry Fitzgerald, one of the best WR's in the league, their QB's are garbage.
And yet Larry still puts up great numbers. I think you're proving my point, not yours.

The truth is a great WR can make a QB. A great QB can make a WR. Sometimes both. Sometimes neither. There's no simple black and white answer here.

And we've seen several examples of both occurrences. I don't know why some people (not talking to you in particular) seem to think it's hardline one way or the other.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:38 am to
The Falcons comments are just people bashing Matt Ryan because they don't like him. He is a very good QB and it's not just because he has great WR's. What did Roddy White do before Ryan? He had one good season in 2007 and his number's got better once they drafted Ryan.
Posted by Jumbeauxlaya
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
18083 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:42 am to
quote:

What did Roddy White do before Ryan? He had one good season in 2007 and his number's got better once they drafted Ryan.

Wait wait wait, the only way a receiver gets better over time is if his QB gets better?

He can't practice, try harder, learn more or get in better shape?
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101348 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:43 am to
quote:

They have Larry Fitzgerald, one of the best WR's in the league, their QB's are garbage.
And yet Larry still puts up great numbers. I think you're proving my point, not yours.


Is the point that a single WR putting up "great numbers" with a mediocre QB is somehow "making a QB"?
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36449 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:51 am to
literal summary of this thread: well QBs usually make receivers but not matt ryan.

jesus christ yall are just sad. clearly it isnt a mutually beneficial relationship between good players. no. not at all.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 3/13/13 at 10:54 am to
quote:

And yet Larry still puts up great numbers. I think you're proving my point, not yours


quite the contray. Despite the fact he puts up numbers, their QB's are garbage. If a great WR can make a WR, why doesn't Fitz?

quote:

And we've seen several examples of both occurrences


Most of the examples are of QB's that are not elite. Stafford and Ryan are good QB's but not elite and are unfairly bashed. IMO they are not made by their WR's.

quote:

I don't know why some people (not talking to you in particular) seem to think it's hardline one way or the other.


QB is the more important position, I don't think that is arguable. Both positions can put up good numbers even with lesser players at the other position, but it is more likely for a QB.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram