Started By
Message

re: AL CY Young and MVP - Can Detroit finish 1/2 in both?

Posted on 8/25/13 at 4:28 pm to
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34639 posts
Posted on 8/25/13 at 4:28 pm to
Somewhat true. anyone batting in RBI situations is bound to get RBIs. BA/RISP reveals a lot too. That tells whether you're making the most of your RBI opportunities.
Posted by The Seaward
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2006
11346 posts
Posted on 8/25/13 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

BA/RISP reveals a lot too


I think that is pretty much luck. And over a large enough time, it will regress to around that player's normal BA.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34639 posts
Posted on 8/25/13 at 4:48 pm to
What about AB per RBI?
Posted by The Seaward
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2006
11346 posts
Posted on 8/25/13 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

What about AB per RBI?


wouldn't pay any mind to it. depends way too much on the quality of your teammates and your spot in the lineup.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34639 posts
Posted on 8/25/13 at 4:56 pm to
So we're kind of going in a circle here?
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 8/25/13 at 5:31 pm to
This is all a waste of time - even the people against Scherzer know he is going to win the Cy Young, barring a complete collapse. If you ignore record, he at least is on par with the others; he leads the league in WHIP and Strike outs and is close to the top on ERA (his teammate having the best ERA). As established in this thread, the advanced metrics are split with Scherzer owning at least his share. W/L may be not mean much, but he his in position to have the best record in the history of MLB - that makes the Cy Young a lock (barring a collapse).

I have never thought W/L was as important as other metrics for obvious reasons. But in every other sport (including baseball) we give credit to the player that has "it". Point guards and quarterbacks are praised or criticized for their ability to be clutch. We report batting average with RISP as if it is statistically different than batting average and criticize AROD in MVP seasons for choking in the playoffs. Then we want to 100% ignore a pitchers ability to pull out close wins? It probably isn't completely meaningless
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34639 posts
Posted on 8/25/13 at 5:50 pm to
That's what I've been saying.
Posted by The White Lobster
Member since Jul 2009
16764 posts
Posted on 8/25/13 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

We report batting average with RISP as if it is statistically different than batting average and criticize AROD in MVP seasons for choking in the playoffs.

I don't do any of this.

Scherzer has always been an example of a great SABR pitcher. This year is no exception, regardless of his win/loss record
Posted by bddwolfpack
NYC
Member since Sep 2010
9407 posts
Posted on 8/26/13 at 9:58 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/16/13 at 11:32 pm
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71371 posts
Posted on 8/26/13 at 10:14 pm to
You can sell me on quality starts, but wins/losses is dumb for a pitcher.
Posted by Sevendust912
Member since Jun 2013
11366 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 2:09 am to
Honest question, why do these baseball guys insist on giving these awards to players on shitty teams. Seriously, Trout? The Angels are 15 games under 15. They suck with Trout and they would suck without him. Ditto for Felix and the Mariners.

MLB is the only league where this happens. CFB doesn't give the Heisman to someone on New Mexico. When was the last time someone on the Jaguars won MVP?
Posted by pkloa
Member since Jan 2011
2264 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 2:30 am to
Baseball writers always try to be the smartest in the room. This is why Mike Trout was in such contention last year. In their defense, they seem to research extensively.

In the NBA, popularity overrides a lot.
In the NFL, a punter could make the opponent start every drive within their own 5, but they aren't even considered football players.
And in CFB, the Heisman award is selected by previous recipients. Not necessarily the best informed or brightest.
Posted by Sevendust912
Member since Jun 2013
11366 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 2:41 am to
I just don't understand why these baseball guys have to make everything so complicated. I watch the games and can see the Cabrera is probably the best hitter of this generation. He is leading his team to the division title and putting up unprecedented numbers. Detroit's lineup would be in a world of hurt without him.

The Tigers have won 16 more games than they have lost with Scherzer starting. That has to count for something. Take that away, and they aren't even making a wild card.

Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 3:24 am to
Detroit has a solid line up regardless of Miggy. He is a great player but Detroit isn't a team that would magically turn into the Astros without him.
Trout is having a great season offensively and is deserving,however, I think Miggy should/will win it again. Trout being on a bad team should have no bearing on his chances for an individual award because it doesn't take away from the season he had. He can't control what the other 8 hitters in line up does or what his pitchers give up.
Posted by Ford Frenzy
337 posts
Member since Aug 2010
6876 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 5:32 am to
So is the clutch factor completely being thrown out? You know the ability to get a guy out with RISP and you're team up 1...

Or just the opposite for the poster saying BA/RISP is just luck
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71371 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 6:50 am to
quote:

So is the clutch factor completely being thrown out? You know the ability to get a guy out with RISP and you're team up 1...


Over time, there is no such thing as "Clutch".

Posted by Sevendust912
Member since Jun 2013
11366 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:10 am to
quote:

Over time, there is no such thing as "Clutch".


Can you elaborate on that?
Posted by Ford Frenzy
337 posts
Member since Aug 2010
6876 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Over time, there is no such thing as "Clutch".
I swear Robert Horry never made a meaningless open 3
Posted by F machine
Member since Jun 2009
11886 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:48 am to
quote:

hen we want to 100% ignore a pitchers ability to pull out close wins? It probably isn't completely meaningless


You can't penalize a pitcher if his offense sucks. That's something he literally has no control over. If he pitches 9 innings and gives up 1 run and still loses, I'd still say he did a damn good job. It's kinda like penalizing a qb who has a terrible defense. He might throw for 5 touchdowns and no int's, but his defense gave up 50 points. Not really his fault.
Posted by Ford Frenzy
337 posts
Member since Aug 2010
6876 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:16 am to
quote:

You can't penalize a pitcher if his offense sucks. That's something he literally has no control over. If he pitches 9 innings and gives up 1 run and still loses, I'd still say he did a damn good job
sounds like his counterpart should win the Cy Young
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram