- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/3/13 at 3:31 pm to LSU316
quote:
So she signed up for STD when she went back to work in anticipation of child #2 at some point in the distant future.
Yeah but you cannot be pregnant when you sign up for STD. I think you have to have had it for at least a year before it will cover pregnancy. Better check with her employer's STD provider to make sure.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 4:11 pm to Zach
Short term disability
Posted on 4/3/13 at 5:24 pm to trident
quote:
baby got to eat
GFY with a hot iron
Posted on 4/3/13 at 5:57 pm to trident
Sure, join in with the leeches. You will find a justification if you try hard enough.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 10:07 pm to Tigris
Do the right thing..this is a slippery slope and one that will affect your kids one day.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 6:19 am to Projectpat
quote:
baby got to eat
GFY with a hot iron
that was a joke douche
Posted on 4/4/13 at 9:56 am to lsunurse
quote:
Yeah but you cannot be pregnant when you sign up for STD. I think you have to have had it for at least a year before it will cover pregnancy. Better check with her employer's STD provider to make sure.
This is correct, Aflac recently denied my wife her STD benefits because she delivered less than a year after she signed up. Missed it by 6 days.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 2:59 pm to trident
AFLAC has some policies that will pay short-term disability for maternity leave, provided that you've held the policy for a certain period of time prior to filing a claim.
As for the unemployment insurance, that seems like an abuse of the system. It's there for people who get laid off through no fault of their own, not for people who decided to have a kid.
As for the unemployment insurance, that seems like an abuse of the system. It's there for people who get laid off through no fault of their own, not for people who decided to have a kid.
Posted on 4/5/13 at 7:29 am to trident
You probably should have thought about this before having your baby. No, it is not right in my opinion to do this. Do it on your own and don't take any "hand me outs". Sorry if I sound rude but I just do not think it's the correct thing to do.
Posted on 4/5/13 at 8:49 am to Herb484
quote:
You probably should have thought about this before having your baby. No, it is not right in my opinion to do this. Do it on your own and don't take any "hand me outs". Sorry if I sound rude but I just do not think it's the correct thing to do.
While I agree with you if you are talking about unemployment or LTD, but as far as short term, if it is a covered benefit they would be stupid to not take it, they paid for it either directly or as a benefit and should use it accordingly
Posted on 4/5/13 at 9:56 am to trident
quote:
Is this an acceptable practice to put my wife on unemployment once she has the baby?
No.
Posted on 4/6/13 at 6:08 am to trident
quote:people are wrong. You don't get unemployment if you quit or are fired. You get unemployment if you are laid off.
people have been telling me that my wife would qualify since she has to quit her job before the baby is born
I'm sure she could go to a quack shrink & get disability, but come on.
Posted on 4/6/13 at 7:29 am to Tigah in the ATL
quote:
Tigah in the ATL
quote:
people are wrong. You don't get unemployment if you quit or are fired. You get unemployment if you are laid off.
Absolutely incorrect.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News