Started By
Message

re: Helping my dad decide between lump sum or annuity

Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:42 pm to
Posted by player711
Member since Jun 2006
285 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:42 pm to
Cash out and buy 1 or 2 rentals with enough case to take the hit in taxes...
--does he need it immediately with income.
There are ways with little risk outside of Wall Street to grow it 10-15% per year and then receive income after that...
Posted by player711
Member since Jun 2006
285 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:43 pm to
Do not pay the house off. Look up lost opportunity costs and you understand why.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50342 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

Cash out and buy 1 or 2 rentals with enough case to take the hit in taxes...
--does he need it immediately with income.
There are ways with little risk outside of Wall Street to grow it 10-15% per year and then receive income after that...


This is a terrible idea.

You are talking about a man on the verge or retiring with NO savings and you want him to take on the liability of 1 or 2 rentals? Assuming he even had the credit to do that, it would be far too risky. He's a few months of no tenant away from going into debt.
Posted by schwartzy
New Orleans
Member since May 2014
9031 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:44 am to
My grandfather got the lump sum and lost it all (a lot to to stocks turning for worse). I would do the annuity so you don't potentially lose everything
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
19820 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 2:42 am to
Tough to really say. Need a lot more info to make a accurate opinion
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15802 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 7:01 am to
He does not sound like an experienced investor. This is not meant to be disrespectful.

If he is able to work until 65, then taking the monthly payment then may be his best option.
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10262 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 7:53 am to
quote:

60. $587/month or $105,000 lump sum
65. $839/month or $119,000 lump sum


I'll just point out the obvious. Don't wait until 65 and then take the lump sum. $14,000 is a horrible return over 5 years. Under 3%, so basically he gets nothing for waiting 5 years. He could do much better by taking the lump sum at 60 and investing or just wait until 65 and take the annuity.
Posted by TigerMan79
Lake Charles
Member since Jul 2014
808 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 8:31 am to
TigerDeBaiter I think you hit the nail on the head. Even a safe municipal bond would get $14,000 over 5 years. This obviously isn't money that he should be taking risk with. What low risk options are out there that have ROI +3%?


Just to recap and clarify: (some are asking for more info)

current age 59. Good health. Will work several more years. $100,000/year income

60. $587/month or $105,000 lump sum
65. $839/month or $119,000 lump sum

Owes $110,000 on $170,000 home (value might be higher)

Has emergency fund but no other savings or retirement account

Does have land inherited. He says $20,000 value. Looking into selling.

Just bought new truck. No clue on amount owed.

That's everything
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11281 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 8:45 am to
No savings with a 100k income? I'd highly encourage him to not put it somewhere he can get his hands on it -- but that's a tough talk to have without seeming disrespectful
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20443 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 9:01 am to
There's no easy way to say it, but your dad is never retiring unless he takes some drastic steps. The annuity isn't worth worrying about unless he takes drastic life changes.

With the annuity and social security he has maybe a $25,000/ year income. He can't afford a truck payment and house payment on that.

With that income he could retire in his late 60s if he wants but it's going to take a life changes.

He clearly lives beyond his means and likely has a ton of toys and hobbies he can't afford.
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 9:02 am
Posted by 1609tiger
Member since Feb 2011
3229 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 9:24 am to
There is no right or wrong answer. It depends on how long he lives and what the lump sum amount would earn over the years. I always look at the monthly projected retirement income. if SS and other project income is enough then I would recommend the lump sum. If the monthly budget is tight then I would lean to the annuitized income.
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11281 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

There is no right or wrong answer


To this question yes, but the bigger issue really seems to be "does dad want to retire or does dad want to spend the money"

It's his life to lead but it seems like dads a spender and at this point that's the wrong choice to make. He's got to slow his roll it seems like given his salary and lack of savings. At 30 and a lower salary I have more equity in the house, emergency fund, and fully finding retirement. That's the much more relevant financial discussion before deciding what to do with this particular asset.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram