Started By
Message

re: 7/9 World Indices: Pacific markets continuing their trend..appears to be worse

Posted on 7/8/15 at 1:14 pm to
Posted by vuvuzela
Oregon
Member since Jun 2010
14663 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

China Bans Stock Sales by Major Shareholders for 6 Months



Wow.....
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
18883 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 1:38 pm to
Are Nikkei futures really down over 5 percent???

This post was edited on 7/8/15 at 1:40 pm
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 1:42 pm to
Nikkei fell thru a head/shoulder pattern earlier

spx is sitting right on the edge of one - potential 75 pt drop which would hit my target of 1975'ish area

will have to see if it plays out

transports getting hammered
This post was edited on 7/8/15 at 1:50 pm
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
18883 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 1:50 pm to
What time frame are you looking for regarding charts and levels of resistance?
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 1:54 pm to
right now, i'm looking at whether spx 2040 holds

time frame i'm interested in is 6 months

not sure about resistance levels 2080, 2100 seem reasonable (spx)
This post was edited on 7/8/15 at 1:59 pm
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
18883 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 8:03 pm to
Nikkei is down 3% AGAIN.

Why? Are they connected to the Chinese economy by default?

Australia is also down again.
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Nikkei is down 3% AGAIN.

Why? Are they connected to the Chinese economy by default?


Not sure. I don't follow Asia too much.

Still think we get spx 2096 - 2100 before a big move down. Dow Jones Transports looking bad.

spx technical breakdown
This post was edited on 7/8/15 at 8:51 pm
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

Why? Are they connected to the Chinese economy by default?
You're kidding right?
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
18883 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 10:16 pm to
I'm not kidding. I'm not well versed in the global economy, however I'm a world geography teacher and I think I recall the two being close in proximity.
Posted by LSUneaux
NOLA
Member since Mar 2014
4486 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 10:26 pm to
Shanghai is up 1%.
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80761 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 10:27 pm to
US markets up ~0.50%

Was hoping for the slide to continue
Posted by beebefootballfan
Member since Mar 2011
19008 posts
Posted on 7/8/15 at 11:59 pm to
quote:

Shanghai-based money manager Alexandre Werno is having to grudgingly accept one of the downsides to running a fund management business on the mainland: stumping up his own cash to help rescue the stock market.

The executive vice general manager of Fortune SG FMC, a joint venture between Baosteel Group and French bank Societe Generale, he and other senior managers had to each invest 500,000 yuan (HK$625,000) into their company funds as part of Beijing's strategy to arrest the steepest fall in equity prices in more than two decades.

"There was an internal debate but as we are in China, we had no choice," Werno said.

That money came on top of the 40 million yuan of Fortune SG capital Werno's company pledged to split between two of its blue chip tracker exchange-traded funds. As part of a recent measure designed by regulators to restore investor confidence, fund houses like Werno's committed to buying index trackers last weekend. Neither Werno nor his firm is supposed to sell these holdings for at least a year.

The only solace Werno takes from the exercise is "strong signals" from regulators that the government will keep the Shanghai Composite index above 3,500 points, only slightly below the level Werno bought in at.

Trying to call the bottom right now is like catching a falling meat cleaver. The country's two main indices tracking Shanghai- and Shenzhen-listed stocks crashed through their 50-day moving average levels late last month and kept on falling. They are now just 4 per cent above the 200-day moving average, seen as a key support level around which traders cut losses and sell.

The 14-day relative strength index, a measurement of a market's strength or weakness, has been flashing oversold for more than a week with little impact.

"I would say we go back to when all the lunacy started in mid 2014, to 2,300. Another 30 or 40 per cent from here," said Michael Every, Rabobank head of financial markets.

"We undo everything that has been done since then as that was all completely artificial."

In particular, the market's margin trading level - stocks bought with borrowed money - estimated at 6 trillion yuan by Bank of America Merrill Lynch, has become a death spiral. The more prices go down, the more pressure on traders to sell or cough up more cash to maintain their positions.

Citibank analysts believe a quarter of margin positions have been closed while analysts at BAML expect the main Shanghai index would need to drop to around 2,500 points before large-scale margin calls are triggered.

Werno said it was already happening as directors of listed companies borrowed heavily against their own stocks to fund mortgages and other investments and now face calls as loan collateral values plummeted.

"[Investors] have never seen this, including back in 2008. Currently there is no liquidity as we have 50 per cent of stocks in China suspended. Everybody wants to sell. Definitely we're worried," said Werno.

The government now needed to go big, said Tim Condon, chief economist at ING. His solution: A 4 trillion yuan package. "Assuming informal margin debt is equal to formal debt, backstopping outstanding margin debt, [it] would be big enough to halt the panic selling," Condon said.


LINK
Posted by LSU0358
Member since Jan 2005
7916 posts
Posted on 7/9/15 at 6:04 am to
Just saw golfers post...emini sept contract. In at 2074. Out at 2050. Looks like i was a day too early this morning. Might try again at end of day if everything holds up.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80095 posts
Posted on 7/9/15 at 6:26 am to
quote:

Was hoping for the slide to continue


Me too...

Oh well, threw a good bit in yesterday. Getting a small, quick pop off of that.

I'll just continue to dollar cost average
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10229 posts
Posted on 7/9/15 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Just saw golfers post...emini sept contract. In at 2074. Out at 2050. Looks like i was a day too early this morning. Might try again at end of day if everything holds up.


Sorry.

For this reason I generally don't play the contracts unless they are far out. Always based on what I think are fundamentals. It's very difficult to go to to 2017 and even 2018 without paying too much. I did on uranium though after it crashed.

I will buy options of the contracts however. Every once in a while I'll sell an option. Not often in this market though. I like to limit losses without giving away my position and getting stopped out An option on a contract guarantee this unless I'm selling them.
This post was edited on 7/9/15 at 7:49 am
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
18883 posts
Posted on 7/9/15 at 8:38 am to
quote:


Was hoping for the slide to continue



I'm pissed off on an irrational level when all 389 stocks on my watch list are green.
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10229 posts
Posted on 7/9/15 at 8:47 am to
Beautiful. Short VIX. There are few opportunities such as the last couple of days. Not 100% guaranteed or predictable, but awfully close. Portfolio insured with VIX calls = extra cash, future's took a spike and I went short VIX puts = even more extra cash.

I suspect after my insurance premium I'm down in the aggregate with respect to insurance versus insurance payout, but a minor blip on the radar screen.

Picked up physical siver yesterday and still paid only $1 over spot. Went long, long metals two days ago for well below implied and intrinsic values.

I furthered my position in ERN.

I have one naked put position that will cost me, but it hasn't yet.

All in all an example of uncertainty and fear which caused further market inefficiencies. Not that the market hasn't already sustained a long period of being inefficient in my estimation, but that debate is for another day and largely subjective.

I saw opportunity. I was accurate insofar as the short term trades I made. Time will tell if I was accurate with respect to longer positions entered in to.

Bring on the world wide recession. Laffy. The one thing I agree with Dave Ramsey about is that I refuse to participate or engage national media fueled economic situations.




This post was edited on 7/9/15 at 8:49 am
Posted by LSU0358
Member since Jan 2005
7916 posts
Posted on 7/9/15 at 10:21 am to
That's the way it goes in futures trading.

I still don't have quite enough money to buy and hold futures contracts. On a long term position I prefer to give 5% of market/stock value swing room when establishing a position. At current SPX value that's over 100 pts or $5K for an e-mini. As I don't want to risk more than 3 to 4% of my account on an initial position. That means more than ~170K is needed for that type of trade. I'm more than halfway there...but still some work to do.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram