- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wings penalty was a bummer
Posted on 10/8/11 at 7:52 pm to LSUtigersarefun
Posted on 10/8/11 at 7:52 pm to LSUtigersarefun
quote:
Because every other penalty gives the team being penalized an advantage the skewed the play!
an offensive lineman taking a cheap shot or something 30 yards away from the ball carrier doesnt give an advantage, but it would negate the TD
1
Posted on 10/8/11 at 7:52 pm to 1bigcat
My thought after seeing the penalty and watching the replay is that the refs were preparing us for the arse-rapng we're going to get from them the first weekend in November. Go ahead and say BOHICA.
Posted on 10/8/11 at 7:54 pm to LSUtigersarefun
They want to call that taunting, fine. But the rule change is completely illogical. Something that has no effect on the outcome of the play, that involves no contact, nulls what happened on the field. It should be on the kickoff like before.
This post was edited on 10/8/11 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 10/8/11 at 7:55 pm to DBG
quote:
an offensive lineman taking a cheap shot or something 30 yards away from the ball carrier doesnt give an advantage, but it would negate the TD
But it could impact the play no matter how unlikely it would be.
Posted on 10/8/11 at 7:55 pm to LSUtigersarefun
quote:
How did Wing saying come at me mate give an unfair advantage to LSU?
It doesn't, but it is being unsportsmanlike.
If this happened to Florida's punter people would be wanting his head for being disrespectful to LSU players.
Posted on 10/8/11 at 7:57 pm to 1bigcat
Mark May just said it was a BS call and they need to change the rule. It's taking the fun out of the game. Players need to be able to enjoy the game.
And I was paraphrasing, of course
And I was paraphrasing, of course
Posted on 10/8/11 at 7:58 pm to LSUtigersarefun
it wouldnt impact the play
what about a WR not being on the line and a TD gets called back due to illegal formation? does the WR being 3 inches closer to the line really affect the play?
what about a WR not being on the line and a TD gets called back due to illegal formation? does the WR being 3 inches closer to the line really affect the play?
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:00 pm to 1bigcat
I don't like the call. A rule is a rule. However, that was a horse collar tackle on Ware, I don't give a rip what Danielson said, that Spenser was turning helping the cause. The gayturd was reaching for the collar before Spencer attempted to spin. Then the gayturd gives the sign of cut throat after the play. There was no call on either. That is SEC officials at their best. The hat said it was a good call. You can bet that Dooley and Will would never admit that.
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:01 pm to DBG
Yes, it could, my point is that their is no possible way that taunting can affect the penalized team in a positive manor, unlike any other rule in the rulebook.
Eta: that isnt a dead ball foul.
Eta: that isnt a dead ball foul.
This post was edited on 10/8/11 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:01 pm to PillageUrVillage
quote:
Players need to be able to enjoy the game.
You can enjoy the game by celebrating with your teammates, not be taunting the opposition.
If this were the other way and the Florida punter did it and it wasn't called everyone on here would be throwing a fit.
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:01 pm to LSUtigersarefun
quote:
Yes, it could
no
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:02 pm to 1bigcat
I don't like the call. A rule is a rule. However, that was a horse collar tackle on Ware, I don't give a rip what Danielson said, that Spenser was turning helping the cause. The gayturd was reaching for the collar before Spencer attempted to spin. Then the gayturd gives the sign of cut throat after the play. There was no call on either. That is SEC officials at their best. The hat said it was a good call. You can bet that Dooley and Will would never admit that.
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:03 pm to DBG
Anybody else just tho kit is hilarious that our PUNTER gets called for taunting? The PUNTER!!
Next thing you know a trombone player will kick a football player's arse!
Oh, wait......
Next thing you know a trombone player will kick a football player's arse!
Oh, wait......
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:04 pm to DBG
quote:
it wouldnt impact the play what about a WR not being on the line and a TD gets called back due to illegal formation? does the WR being 3 inches closer to the line really affect the play?
Bubble screen and the defender gets blocked because of the extra space he creates, or the cornerback has to adjust to the possibility of that play being called.
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:04 pm to TiketheMiger
quote:
If this were the other way and the Florida punter did it and it wasn't called everyone on here would be throwing a fit.
Do you really think that? You can't possibly.
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:04 pm to Tigerloo
.........think it is hilarious..........
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:05 pm to TiketheMiger
quote:
Definition of Flagrant: Conspicuously or obviously offensive.
If it was flagrant or egregious...you would have seen it when it happened.
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:06 pm to LSUtigersarefun
no man, no
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:07 pm to LSUPHILLY72
Get some class. Whoop their arse quietly and go on to the next game. Bush league move in my opinion.
Posted on 10/8/11 at 8:07 pm to Tigerloo
quote:
Next thing you know a trombone player will kick a football player's arse!
Thought it was a Tuba...
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News