- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why doesn't the SEC get rid of Vandy and Mizzou?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:13 pm
Partly prompted by the fact that we never get to play either of these patsies. But more important, neither program has the means to field SEC-caliber football teams on a consistent basis. Vandy is Vandy - admission requirements too high, and Missouri doesn't have the recruiting base to compete. You have to admit that game last week was a joke.
Like it or not, replacing them with FSU and Clemson would add much needed quality to the SEC East. Anybody agree?
Like it or not, replacing them with FSU and Clemson would add much needed quality to the SEC East. Anybody agree?
34
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:14 pm to TNTigerman
Mizzou wins the East like every year
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:14 pm to TNTigerman
Did Mizzou just win the east two years in a row?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:14 pm to TNTigerman
What makes you think FSU and Clemson would want to join the SEC?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:15 pm to TNTigerman
Mizzou and A&M don't belong here. I was never okay with it. It's downright stupid as hell that Austin and College Station are 80 miles away and they don't play anymore.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:15 pm to TNTigerman
quote:
Missouri doesn't have the recruiting base to compete
Team that just won its division the past two years...
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:15 pm to TNTigerman
quote:
Mizzou
As in the Mizzou that has won the East last 2 years?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:16 pm to TNTigerman
More important question...
how is missouri in the "East" ?
how is missouri in the "East" ?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:19 pm to TNTigerman
Do you know that Mizzou has won the SEC east twice in their first 3 years in the conference.
As far as Vandy, you know that football isn't the only sport that the SEC compete's in? Vandy is pretty good at Baseball and Basketball.
As far as Vandy, you know that football isn't the only sport that the SEC compete's in? Vandy is pretty good at Baseball and Basketball.
This post was edited on 10/27/15 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:20 pm to Mike Honcho
The SEC loves Vandy. They are one of the charter members with high academic standards which brings up the average GPA and graduation rate. Also, they have a good basketball team and a great baseball team.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:20 pm to Ducyborg
quote:
Did Mizzou just win the east two years in a row?
Sure, by default. What do you think their record would have been those two years if they were in the SEC West (which, geographically, they should be) and played a Western division team's schedule?
That's what I thought you'd say.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:22 pm to musick
quote:
how is missouri in the "East" ?
Because auburn is in the "west"
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:24 pm to TNTigerman
quote:Can't
Why doesn't the SEC get rid of Vandy?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:24 pm to TNTigerman
quote:
What do you think their record would have been those two years if they were in the SEC West (which, geographically, they should be) and played a Western division team's schedule?
The same could be said about Kentucky or until recently Tennessee. SEC West is still the tightest collection of talent in any division in the country.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:27 pm to TNTigerman
quote:
Sure, by default.
Which still means they were better than 6 other SEC school in their division that you are not arguing should be kicked out of the conference. Mizzou is historically an okay football team and they have an all time winning percentage against half of the conference. You can't make an argument based on performance alone that they don't belong in the conference. Maybe culturally they are a poor fit but they are just fine in terms of performance for a conference that keeps around Vandy, South Carolina and the Mississippi schools.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:28 pm to TNTigerman
Wave a wand commish.
stupid thread + those schools contribute in basketball dumbass
stupid thread + those schools contribute in basketball dumbass
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:31 pm to TNTigerman
Everyone agrees... Except Missouri, Vandy, Fla State and Clemson...
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:31 pm to TNTigerman
Florida State or Clemson would be awesome for SEC East! I also think University of Texas would be great addition to the SEC West! Mizzou has won the East 2 years running. I'm not going to bash them now. They get a mulligan in 2015 - much like Auburn.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:32 pm to TNTigerman
quote:
Vandy
Played for the last two national championships in baseball.
quote:
Mizzou
Made it to Atlanta in 2013 and 2014
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:35 pm to TNTigerman
If you haven't noticed, Vandy has one of the best defenses in the SEC & nation this year. They are legit & almost knocked off Ole Miss because of that defense. Offensively though they are very much challenged there.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News