- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: what is the solution to schedule inequity? (serious question)
Posted on 5/2/14 at 4:44 pm to TigerBait1127
Posted on 5/2/14 at 4:44 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
Auburn and Alabama would have to be in the same division.
That could be arranged. Auburn and 'Bama to the East, Mizzou and Kentucky or Vandy to the West.
quote:
I want to play Bama every year.
Yeah. And Bama wants to play Tennessee every year. That's the root of the problem. You can't have it both ways--keep the rivalries you like, and have competitive fairness.
1
Posted on 5/2/14 at 6:30 pm to nycajun
So the east consists of Bama, auburn, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, and Vandy while the West has LSU, A&M, ole Miss, msu, Kentucky and Missouri, and Arkansas
Balanced league
Sure you can, let them schedule as OOC and only count division games towards SEC standings. If it is that important to them, let them make it work
Balanced league
quote:
You can't have it both ways--keep the rivalries you like, and have competitive fairness.
Sure you can, let them schedule as OOC and only count division games towards SEC standings. If it is that important to them, let them make it work
This post was edited on 5/2/14 at 6:33 pm
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News