- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Today's Scrimmage stats and more
Posted on 8/19/17 at 2:50 pm to BayouCowboy
Posted on 8/19/17 at 2:50 pm to BayouCowboy
I have no doubt the front seven is talented but O is clearly concerned with pass protection. He specifically singled it out.
10 sacks is absurd no matter what the front seven looks like.
10 sacks is absurd no matter what the front seven looks like.
5
Posted on 8/19/17 at 2:52 pm to rmnldr
ArandaEffect or the more logical explanation of the line just not being that good at pass protection right now. I'll put my money on the latter.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 2:52 pm to skullhawk
quote:
10 sacks is absurd no matter what the front seven looks like.
I don't think he specified if it was for just the 1v1 or whatever. It could be a combination from both teams.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 2:53 pm to skullhawk
quote:
10 sacks is absurd no matter what the front seven looks like.
Probably need to keep in mind that Etling and Brennan aren't live, so take that stat with a grain of salt.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 2:53 pm to Brazos
I'll reserve judgement until the season plays out.
Really concerned with pass protection. If it's not good it's going to be hell, for anyone we have at QB.
Really concerned with pass protection. If it's not good it's going to be hell, for anyone we have at QB.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 2:56 pm to BayouCowboy
We need to go after Texas A@m offensive line coach. Great recruiter and always seems to have All-american left tackles year after year.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 2:56 pm to Tigerbait357
I'll reserve judgement until later also but this is obviously a problem. I heard about pass pro being bad last night on sports talk on wwl.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 2:57 pm to skullhawk
quote:
O said there might have been 10 sacks today. Pass pro sounds like a shite show.
Or the DL is outstanding? You're playing yourselves. If one side does "well" the other side played "poorly". I don't get worked up over scrimmage stats. LSU's OL probably isn't going to play many better DL's than the one on their own team.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 2:58 pm to Brazos
quote:
. I heard about pass pro being bad last night on sports talk on wwl.
But how would they even know???
Posted on 8/19/17 at 3:00 pm to nicksaur3
Any word on how Jacoby Stephend played?
Posted on 8/19/17 at 3:02 pm to Alt26
quote:Dude 10 sacks is an outof this world number
Or the DL is outstanding? You're playing yourselves. If one side does "well" the other side played "poorly". I don't get worked up over scrimmage stats. LSU's OL probably isn't going to play many better DL's than the one on their own team.
if that's true our o line was shitasticPosted on 8/19/17 at 3:07 pm to lsupride87
quote:
our o line was shitastic
Calm down bro, they're not tackling the quarterbacks, so it's much easier to get "sacks". Also, as someone else pointed out, we have no context about whether all 10 were for the first team defense or if it was 10 total, for both teams.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 3:14 pm to whitefoot
Brennan threw a TD to J. Jefferson.
Jacoby showed good hands. WR's as a whole inconsistent.
Jacoby showed good hands. WR's as a whole inconsistent.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 3:15 pm to nicksaur3
Regardless of who was quarterbacking, the fact that we threw 44 passes versus 50 runs is a Good sign for the offense.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 3:15 pm to whitefoot
quote:I am perfectly calm. Just pointing out if there would have been 10 legit sacks, that speaks far more about our o line than our d
Calm down bro, they're not tackling the quarterbacks, so it's much easier to get "sacks". Also, as someone else pointed out, we have no context about whether all 10 were for the first team defense or if it was 10 total, for both teams.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 3:15 pm to skullhawk
quote:
I have no doubt the front seven is talented but O is clearly concerned with pass protection. He specifically singled it out.
10 sacks is absurd no matter what the front seven looks like.
Unless I heard wrong, Pretty sure he clarified that most of the sacks were given up by second team O line.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 3:15 pm to nicksaur3
quote:
O will soon name a QB starter, Lowell and Brennan will both play some this year
This is pretty discouraging. I wish for just one year we could know for sure that this guy is our guy. From beginning to end of the season. Mettenberger 2013 is the only QB I can even remotely remember in the last 10 years where that was the case
Posted on 8/19/17 at 3:16 pm to Rebel
1 catch for Stevens
Posted on 8/19/17 at 3:18 pm to nicksaur3
I was present the RB's were by far the most impressive position group. DE clearly the starter MB clearly #2.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 3:18 pm to lsupride87
Sacks were called for pretty much "one hand touch anywhere".
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News