Started By
Message

re: The PF penalty on the "fair catch".

Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
72526 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:31 pm to
my seat was almost directly in line with the first down marker

he did not get the first down
Posted by J Lo
Member since Jan 2012
31 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:31 pm to
he was waving at LM (whose head was in the sky)
and refs took it as fair catch...."fair to say" Lessy in the sky with diamonds......
Posted by LSUPHILLY72
Member since Aug 2010
5358 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

obviously signaled his intention by extending one hand only clearly above his head and waving that hand from side to side of his body more than once.


Clearly not a valid fair catch signal.
Posted by Broketec
Dumpster Fire
Member since Sep 2006
1226 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:32 pm to
It wasn't a fair catch.

From the 2011 rule book -

quote:

ARTICLE 1. a. A fair catch of a scrimmage kick is a catch beyond the neutral
zone by a Team B player who has made a valid signal during a scrimmage kick
that is untouched beyond the neutral zone.

Valid Signal
ARTICLE 2. A valid signal is a signal given by a player of Team B who has
obviously signaled his intention by extending one hand only clearly above




He did not raise his hand above his head.

*Derp* Someone's PDF loaded faster than mine did
This post was edited on 1/11/12 at 1:33 pm
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57495 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

The bad call was the spot on the fake field goal. No way he got that.


His butt hit the ground a good yard from the first down marker.
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:35 pm to
Dude was spinning records not calling for a fair catch.. What was up with the announcers not saying anything about it either?? Thats an easy screw up to see.
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:40 pm to
They screwed that fair catch call up as I suspected...I can't believe there are people on here defending that was a fair catch.

The announcers snowed everyone over by saying, "we called some guy (expert), and he said that was a valid fair catch." :coughbullshit:
This post was edited on 1/11/12 at 1:41 pm
Posted by taf
Kansas City, KS
Member since Dec 2003
751 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

"we called some guy (expert), and he said that was a valid fair catch."


ha

Yep. It was a bad call. I was a little mad when it happened, but so much else was going wrong, it was hard to get too worked up.

And the announcers were awful. I just think they didn't know the rule and were trying to quickly move on before the audience realized that.
Posted by cajuncdm
Acadiana
Member since Aug 2007
1088 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:48 pm to
FWIW...

Wife and I are in stands with binoculars (VERY HIGH), and she happens to be watching head official when game goes to TV break right after PF for the fair catch play. She says, "You aren't gonna believe this. The line judge just walked over to head official with the white hat and told him that that was a really bad call, man. Head official says 'what do you want me to do about it, it's done.'

I WAS surprised by that exchange.
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

FWIW...

Wife and I are in stands with binoculars (VERY HIGH), and she happens to be watching head official when game goes to TV break right after PF for the fair catch play. She says, "You aren't gonna believe this. The line judge just walked over to head official with the white hat and told him that that was a really bad call, man. Head official says 'what do you want me to do about it, it's done.'

I WAS surprised by that exchange.


Holy Crap!....but it was an awful call.
Posted by duboisd
Palestine, Texas
Member since Jan 2006
2504 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

The bad call was the spot on the fake field goal. No way he got that.


I was shocked that more wasn't said about that. He was about a half-yard short of where they spotted them.
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

I was shocked that more wasn't said about that. He was about a half-yard short of where they spotted them.



The spot was very generous to the gumps but they got their FG block on that series anyway....

The fair catch call was more clearly a bad call than the fake FG spot and probably had a bigger effect on the the game.
Posted by duboisd
Palestine, Texas
Member since Jan 2006
2504 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:59 pm to
Regardless of how much we didn't like the call, it was the right one. You wouldn't use it as an example of how to signal for a fair catch, it was valid. If he would've returned it for a TD we would be screaming that he signaled fair catch.
Posted by Nissanmaxima
Member since Feb 2006
14928 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 2:00 pm to
Was watching the game with a high school ref and he said that you clearly have to wave your hand ABOVE your head for a fair catch. The spot on the fake field goal was very generous. With all of that being said, none of that made a difference in this game.
Posted by TigerDon
Member since Nov 2011
47 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

cajuncdm
The PF penalty on the "fair catch".
FWIW...

Wife and I are in stands with binoculars (VERY HIGH), and she happens to be watching head official when game goes to TV break right after PF for the fair catch play. She says, "You aren't gonna believe this. The line judge just walked over to head official with the white hat and told him that that was a really bad call, man. Head official says 'what do you want me to do about it, it's done.'

I WAS surprised by that exchange.


So your wife can read lips from the upper deck?
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Regardless of how much we didn't like the call, it was the right one.


What made it the right call?! According to the rules that was clearly a bad call.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57495 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

And the announcers were awful.


I bet the floor under Musberger was sticky by the time the game ended.
Posted by BillF
Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2006
5100 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

They screwed that fair catch call up as I suspected...I can't believe there are people on here defending that was a fair catch.


It's because most people have seen such bad calls in college football games that they accept the lame explanations without actually knowing the game and the rules. I remember having a discussion with an Auburn fan the year the pass interference call against Auburn was waved off. He was so sure it was an uncatchable ball.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57495 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

He was so sure it was an uncatchable ball.


Most balls are when somebody's climbing on your back.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram