Started By
Message

re: The Experts Are Wrong About Players Generating Revenue

Posted on 6/21/11 at 12:13 pm to
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20443 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

So please, work on you reading comprehension skills before you start slinging the mud.

You've got to be kidding me. So far you have littered this thread with horrible analogies, incoherent dribble for logic, and have been called out by myself and 2 or 3 other posters.

(But you got a chance to drop in the fact that you played college and professional ball)*high five
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9044 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Try being a full time student and working part time to make ends meet. And then once I graduated, had $40,000.00 of debt from student loans since part time job wasn't enough to pay rent, bills, books, food, and anything else.

So when I graduated, I was faced with a $300.00 monthly payment at the very minimum to cover interest alone.

That's because I didn't get a college apartment paid for, I didn't get my books paid for, I didn't get a personal tutor, and I didn't get a meal plan. All the things an athelte is given. I would have given my left nut to get those things and not have $40,000 of debt after graduating.

And to boot, I'm not making millions to play a sport right now either.

So forgive me if I fail to be sympathetic b/c an athlete has to go to class, workout and practice, and deal with being on national tv every weekend in the fall. And then have cart blanche/celebrity status at any restaurant in town, and once they gradaute - make ten times a year what I make.

ETA: And let's not forget that these athletes are playing because, big money shot here, they want to play. Nobody is holding a gun to their head.


My (nearly) exact same situation and exact same thoughts. I'm sorry, but I have zero sympathy for collegiate athletes who get that full-ride. When I was at UGA, I knew several players and I know exactly what they got and how, and I will tell you that I would have no hesitation whatsoever trading my situation with theirs. Yeah they work and practice long hours (part of the year) while also having the same responsibilities as other students (with some nice advantages, such as exclusive study facilities and free tutoring).

I think what so many people forget and what I think is indicative or a much larger unfortunate mindset is that these guys are playing big-time college football. I mean, shite, call me naive but if I got to play football for LSU of UGA on scholarship, I would be constantly reminded of how lucky I am.

In other words, it is sad that while some people would say to themselves "I get to play a sport I love on national television. How awesome is that?"

Other people are saying "I have to endure the pressure of being on national television. I'm being exploited."
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

, you are kidding yourself. For me, its the uniform, not the player inside the uniform. College players come and go, but the purple and gold is the constant attraction.


what also remains constant is the level of player. Why do you think big DI schools like LSU, Texas and Penn State draw so well, get on TV and generate millions, while 1AA and D III do not?
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43299 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 12:34 pm to
I don't think that players should be paid extra. A free ride through school is TONS of money as it is. There aren't many athletic departments that make enough money to give extra back to the school like LSU does. I'd like to keep it that way.
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20443 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

A free ride through school is TONS of money as it is.

The problem is that a lot of people don't believe this, and mainly out of sheer ignorance.
Posted by LSU82BILL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2006
10319 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

You've got to be kidding me. So far you have littered this thread with horrible analogies, incoherent dribble for logic, and have been called out by myself and 2 or 3 other posters.


LOL. Because you are too fricking stupid to understand a correlation between 2 examples, does not make it a horrible analogy.....but feel free to point quote whatever you are saying is "incoherent"....right after you point out where I "equate" Asian factory workers and college athletes.....although I'm sure ALOT of thinga are incoherent to you. By the way genius, I think the word you are looking for is DRIVEL.
This post was edited on 6/21/11 at 12:50 pm
Posted by TigerEd
Luling
Member since Dec 2004
218 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 12:53 pm to
quote:
__________________________________________________
what also remains constant is the level of player. Why do you think big DI schools like LSU, Texas and Penn State draw so well, get on TV and generate millions, while 1AA and D III do not?

__________________________________________________

Because over the past 100 years the schools built up something called "The gameday traditions that turned into mega-cultural events." That is where the fan following is. As said earlier, if the same players played on semi-pro teams, they would have no TV and no fan support. It is the fact that they play for LSU, Texas, Penn State etc. that people watch.
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20443 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

By the way genius, I think the word you are looking for is DRIVEL

My mistake.

quote:

Because you are too fricking stupid

This is like a morbidly obese person calling a chubby person a lard arse.
Posted by peopleschamp
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
6576 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 1:02 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/10/11 at 4:37 pm
Posted by TigerEd
Luling
Member since Dec 2004
218 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 1:13 pm to
quote:
__________________________________________________
I am against paying players, but you're argument makes no sense to me. To say players don't generate money for the univeristies is dumb. Take away all the players and you have no teams. How can you say players don't at least contribute money to the programs? A game can't be played with no players. Try watching a game with no players on the field.

__________________________________________________

That sounds like something my sister in law would say.
Posted by LSU82BILL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2006
10319 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

This is like a morbidly obese person calling a chubby person a lard arse.


.....says the guy who uses the word "dribble" for "drivel". Glad to see that you can laugh at your admission that you are only moderately stupid.
Posted by zack7552
Lawton, OK
Member since Jul 2008
3823 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

Atheletes spend more time practicing for their sports than normal students do working part time jobs.


Honestly, I think that this is one of the best arguments.

We expect so much out of the student-athletes forgetting that they are students first. We expect them to practice in spring, learn the playbooks, and be faster, better, and stronger. That takes a buttload of time. These guys are committed to football...and we (fans and coaches) expect them to be. I think that a stipend for living/recreation is reasonable considering all the time they put into this extracurricular activity.
Posted by GoldRing
Warner Robins, GA.
Member since May 2011
855 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 2:13 pm to
Fans inherit a responsibility too, famous Quotes by Vince Lombardi:

"The achievements of an organization are the results of the combined effort of each individual.”
“People who work together will win, whether it be against complex football defenses, or the problems of modern society.”
“Individual commitment to a group effort – that is what makes a team work, a company work, a society work, a civilization work.”

Your LSU College football program Has grown into a very large and expensive football extravaganza. This country's Major TV networks are deeply invested into college football, just look around you, LSU Tiger Stadium, etc.

Winning is why LSU football program is successful, not the color. The Quote by Vince Lombardi is very true. You invest in men, not things. You should better understand your own value to your LSU football program. Hand & Glove, you can not have one with out the other.

We are all in the same boat.
Posted by LSU82BILL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2006
10319 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

We expect so much out of the student-athletes forgetting that they are students first. We expect them to practice in spring, learn the playbooks, and be faster, better, and stronger. That takes a buttload of time. These guys are committed to football...and we (fans and coaches) expect them to be. I think that a stipend for living/recreation is reasonable considering all the time they put into this extracurricular activity.


Almost all athletes forfeit a good amount of free time like Holidays and breaks that other students don't. All football players have to report fall camp several weeks before the start of the semester, many don't get to home for Thanksgiving, and many miss alot of the Christmas break preparing for bowl games. Baseball players have to be back early in January and don't get a Spring Break. Most athletes at LSU are also very active in the community in activities like Habitat for Humanity, visiting sick kids in the hospital and tutoring. I don't think a stipend is going to revolutionize amateur athletics. And for all the guys that think a scholarship is worth TONS of money....what about athletes who put in the same time and effort and get no athletic grant in aid money?
Posted by bulletprooftiger
Member since Aug 2006
2038 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 5:12 pm to
The football players at LSU and similar programs cannot be compared to the typical students at those schools. They are elite. They are called to the highest level of their future profession.

Elite law, medical, business, and engineering students can all receive substantial income from their prospective professions before they are professionals. This is true regardless of whether they generate revenue for their schools.

Why should these elite, pre-professional football players, who generate money for their schools*, be denied the same privilege?

*Don't kid yourself. Even if you support LSU more than a particular player, you invested a lot less in the program during the Hallman and Dinardo errors [intentional] than you have since Saban turned the program around by bringing in elite talent.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

The problem is that a lot of people don't believe this, and mainly out of sheer ignorance.


your statement is also one of sheer ignorance. A college education has value, but its not "TONS of money. Stop by Louie's and see if you can give some of your education in exchange for hash browns

The schools should not pay the players as someone else said, most are losing money anyway. however, we could allow the players to earn money thru endorsements, let agents or alum pay them etc. If it was above ground, it could be monitored and better controled if that's an issue.
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16170 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

As said earlier, if the same players played on semi-pro teams, they would have no TV and no fan support. It is the fact that they play for LSU, Texas, Penn State etc. that people watch.


You seem to hark on this point as it is your main defense. Nobody is denying that if you put those players on a semi pro team they would get no support. But to say better players do not generate more money is extremely naive. Yes, big time programs have die hard fans that will fork up the money to watch any team that is fielded, but there is a LARGE portion of every school's fanbase that will only pay attention if the team is successful.

You have a point, but your reasoning is flawed. There are so many other factors to take into account.
Posted by tgerb8
Huntsvegas
Member since Aug 2007
5983 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

if the same players played on semi-pro teams, they would have no TV and no fan support. It is the fact that they play for LSU, Texas, Penn State etc. that people watch


Or is it that LSU, Texas, etc. ARE semi pro and have just found a loophole?

College football revenue posted 2.2 billion last year.. putting it fourth in the country, right behind the NBA in terms of worth.
LSU had a total attendance of around 647k in 7 home games which beats out 7 NBA teams (at 41 home games)
The bcs championship game had a tv rating of 18.2.
New Orleans vs. New England on Monday night Football got 14.4
If you don't think it's already Semi-Pro (if not pro)you are kidding yourself..
I don't care either way.. but if we're going to call it "amateur" then it shouldn't be a multi billion dollar industry.. the tickets should be free.. the games shouldn't be on tv.. and obviously the BCS doesn't exist..
If we're going to call it what it is.. then the players should get compensation just like any other league.
Posted by tiger in the gump
Member since Jan 2005
775 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

what do you think would happen if the following occured? Take all the players from LSU and Florida (or any major teams) Put them in semi-pro league uniforms with La. Steam vs Fla. Sun playing


Over a period of time, you don't think this will gain momentum? Do you think Pro players also shouldn't get paid? Bc even if you chANGE half teh saints, fans will show up anyways
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
53417 posts
Posted on 6/21/11 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

The idea that players should get more money and benefits because "they" generate revenue is asinine.


A free education at a university >>>>>>>> a couple grand made from jersey sales

Not saying they don't deserve it, but they shouldn't be punished for a measly 2-5k
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram