Started By
Message

re: Should LSU have scored a TD instead of taking a knee

Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:42 am to
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:42 am to
At the 1 yd line? It's different. In the eyes of the players and coaches. I promise you.

So is a baseball game when you're up by 10.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84062 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:45 am to
quote:

So are you going to ignore that the polls actually had the eventual NC left out of the playoff hunt?

LINK



AP was one off, and who's to say Baylor doesn't win like tOSU did?

But you weren't making the argument that they may have had one team just out. You were making the argument that they could be way off. Don't try to change it now because the facts don't fit your argument.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84062 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:46 am to
quote:

At the 1 yd line? It's different. In the eyes of the players and coaches. I promise you.



Not when the game is literally over when you take that knee.

quote:

So is a baseball game when you're up by 10.


That argument holds no water, as I've already addressed.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:47 am to
If Les had run up the score and people were on here bitch ing about it you'd be defending Les. Stop pretending youre anything more the a Les Miles defender to the end. Les could go 0-12 and there is a group of you that would want to give him a raise.
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:48 am to
Didn't Miles try not to score versus Ole Miss for like 3 straight drives a few years ago?

LINK

I seem to recall Zach getting in the doghouse for making a good run.

Ask any Ole Miss fan what was more insulting. Trying to score or sitting on the ball purposely not trying barely into the 4th qtr.
This post was edited on 10/5/15 at 10:50 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84062 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:48 am to
Nice impossible to prove argument you've made there.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Based on your opinion only.



Your position however is based upon concrete undisputed fact?
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:51 am to
My position is based on we don't fricking know. So why leave any doubt.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84062 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:52 am to
quote:

My position is based on we don't fricking know. So why leave any doubt.


This game's result didn't leave doubt one way or the other. That score would make no difference. You are arguing to argue.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Have a downvote.

Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:54 am to
You're just writing it off because it doesn't support your opinion. It holds water because the situations are almost exactly the same.

End of the game totally in hand, if a runner is a 3rd and ball gets caught at the fence, he jogs in. If a football team is at the one, they run a play. That doesn't mean a team steals and bunts just like a football team isn't passing at midfield and running anything other than off tackle plays.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84062 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:55 am to
quote:

You're just writing it off because it doesn't support your opinion.


No, I'm writing it off because in baseball the other team still has an opportunity to win. That is not the case with less than a minute up 3 tds.

quote:

. It holds water because the situations are almost exactly the same.


Except they aren't.
Posted by LeonPhelps
Member since May 2008
8185 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:57 am to
And if a defender had gotten hurt on the extra drive EMU got because we scored with time on the clock? That is the #1 reason you run out the clock when you can. If we score to pad stats or "reward a running back", then we leave time on the clock for EMU to try and get a garbage TD. Injuries can and do happen during those types of drives. It is not smart football at all.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61758 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 11:00 am to
quote:

And if a defender had gotten hurt on the extra drive EMU got because we scored with time on the clock? That is the #1 reason you run out the clock when you can. If we score to pad stats or "reward a running back", then we leave time on the clock for EMU to try and get a garbage TD. Injuries can and do happen during those types of drives. It is not smart football at all.


Not a single starter should have been in the game there. But here's a little known secret to some of you, the backups want to play in the games and they want to succeed as well.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 11:02 am to
Up 10 or 20, yes the game is over in baseball. We're not talking about t ball or JV teams. That's the only basis for your argument. And it's weak as shite.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78917 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Yes. Always score when running at the end of a blow out.


Baylor does it.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84062 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 11:02 am to
quote:

But here's a little known secret to some of you, the backups want to play in the games and they want to succeed as well.


And here's a secret for you. Taking a knee is the right call in that situation 100% of the time. Only a Miles bashing moron would complain about this.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84062 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Up 10 or 20, yes the game is over in baseball. We're not talking about t ball or JV teams. That's the only basis for your argument. And it's weak as shite.


quote:

More recently and less controversially, the Braves came back from seven runs down on May 10, 1994, to force extra innings and then they beat the Phillies in 15; six years later the Brewers overcame a ninth-inning deficit of seven runs to extend the game and beat the Astros in 10 innings. In all, home fans have cheered on seven ninth-inning comebacks from seven runs down since 1957, according to baseball scribe John Walsh, who dug through Retrosheet files.


It's not the same. Shut up already.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 11:07 am to
Do you have literacy issues? 7 is not 10 or 20.
Posted by KC Tiger
Member since Sep 2006
4617 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 11:07 am to
quote:

You're just writing it off because it doesn't support your opinion. It holds water because the situations are almost exactly the same.


Your baseball analogy is, at best, flawed. You either don't understand what what Lnchbox is saying or you are pretending you don't understand.

You do agree in your baseball scenario the other team would still have a chance to bat and thereby score enough runs to win the game...correct?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram