Started By
Message

Should Etling be the starter next year?

Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:43 pm
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94555 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:43 pm
Odds are, a new offense is going to be implemented. Everybody has to learn a new playbook. Frankly, with all the experience were losing (Fournette, Dural, Dupre?, Pocic, White, Beckwith, Duke, D Thomas) I'd almost rather see one of the younger QBs get the nod in 2017. Rather than have Etling learning a new system and then start an inexperienced QB in 2018.
Posted by MasterofTigerBait
Member since May 2009
7592 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:44 pm to
We shall wait for Lord Kiffin to decide
Posted by Malaysian Tiger
Manila
Member since May 2008
4732 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:44 pm to
The kid passes for over 300 yards, 54 points, 622 Total Offense! The kid is getting better and better!
This post was edited on 11/26/16 at 9:49 pm
Posted by stickly
Asheville, NC
Member since Nov 2012
2338 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:45 pm to
Guy just threw for 300 plus. Damn son. Let the guy lay.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39498 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:46 pm to
He has grown so much, I'd say yes. You can run spread without a dt quarterback. I think what we will see next year is more akin to bama pre hurts, or an ole miss type spread.
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
23327 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:46 pm to
It really depends on what flavor of spread we are talking about. He is probably the most accurate passer out of the current QBs and those incoming. If we aren't going rely a ton on QB run in year one, then he might be ok. If it is a power spread, he may not be a good fit. Etling has ok speed, but he doesn't have the build to withstand that kind of punishment in the SEC.

I have a feeling we will see multiple QBs next year by design. With none completely fitting the bill, and 2 good ones being very young (but not Jalen Hurts, either), then I bet we have packages for a couple of guys.
This post was edited on 11/26/16 at 9:55 pm
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19812 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:46 pm to
Yes. He just put on one of the best passing performances in recent LSU memory.
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94555 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

You the Coach?


I was on Alleva's short list. Didn't have a damn binder though.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19812 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

I was on Alleva's short list. Didn't have a damn binder though.


I left mine in the car!
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

I'd almost rather see one of the younger QBs get the nod in 2017.


Because experience is over rated?
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94555 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

best passing performances



quote:

in recent LSU memory.


That's not saying a whole lot. We get a 300 yard Passer once every 14 games or so.
Posted by FLBooGoTigs1
Nocatee, FL.
Member since Jan 2008
54576 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:50 pm to
Lord Brennan may have a say so if he gets early enrollment
Posted by SmokedBacon
Member since Sep 2016
6 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:52 pm to
He absolutely should, for 2 reasons.

First, he has managed the game well and is clearly improving as the year goes on.

Second, the worst thing you could do is put someone in too early and have him get destroyed due to being started too early. I will use Jarrett Lee as an example. Kid had potential but was started too early due to discipline issues with others. Lee could have been great but was started too soon.

Let the new guys learn and come in during blowouts of lesser teams.
Posted by easy money
Member since Feb 2005
14420 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:53 pm to
We may only lose Pocic, Boutte, Fournette, and Dural on offense. Dural has been almost useless since the emergence of Chark. Dupre has not really performed at a level that's going to get him big bucks, but he could show out at a combine. If we get an OC that can make him more of a factor, he will stay.

Considering the qb is on that side of the ball, I think you roll with Etling unless there is clearly a better option. He realistically should have won every game except for the Bama game. I am not opposed to whatever ideas a new OC has, but I don't see any glaring issues with the way Etling has operated.
Posted by navy
Parts Unknown, LA
Member since Sep 2010
29049 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:54 pm to
Surely we can find some kid that was 2nd string at Mamou ... we need a QB that sounds like us and stuff ... someone who really loves LSU.
Posted by la_birdman
Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31014 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:55 pm to
He's got my vote.
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94555 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:56 pm to
Danny certainly has a leg up, given his experience. And I guess if he looks the best man for the job, it's his. But a Lindsey Scott will be a RSFR. If he and Etling are neck and neck, do you go with experience or the man with several more years to play.
Posted by Tigertown in ATL
Georgia foothills
Member since Sep 2009
29206 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:56 pm to
I don't know the answer but think we definitely should decide this tonight.
Posted by SmokedBacon
Member since Sep 2016
6 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Surely we can find some kid that was 2nd string at Mamou ... we need a QB that sounds like us and stuff ... someone who really loves LSU.



LOL, though I think this board is giving CEO too much crappie, this is funny stuff!
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84124 posts
Posted on 11/26/16 at 9:58 pm to
Yes. /thread
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram