Started By
Message

re: Saban comments about rematch talk with ESPN reporter

Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:49 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260008 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

All we have is their resume.


All we know from their resume is OSU lost to a pretty crappy team.

quote:

And osu is better.


Very few people will agree with you, which is why Bama is ranked second.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53769 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:51 pm to
Champions don't lose their final game

Period!

It's a must win game
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9126 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:58 pm to
Saban's hypocrisy regarding this issue has been well documented and discussed at length, plus some... I was really pissed about every aspect of the whole thing when it went down, but now.... it is what is.... bring em on! I fully expect this time the Tigers will leave no doubt!!
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260008 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:01 pm to
quote:



I hope you are 100% correct, I was only saying if we lost that AP would still make us #1, I'm not sure of that.



I don't think it matters since there are LSU fans who think OSU is better than Bama, and if Bama wins will be considered better than LSU.

What happens to these fans when LSU wins? Do they not accept this illegitimate NC against Bama? Is it still invalid since lSU didn't play OSU?
This post was edited on 12/19/11 at 7:08 pm
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37247 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

In the future, I think the #2 ranking (after week 9) should be left void..until all teams have finished the season..

that would help fend off the ESPN pump machine that swong a lot of voters 2.5 weeks before the fiasco


I think they should get rid of preseason rankings. There's really no justification putting team A @ 1 and putting team B @ 2. It makes the rankings biased. One team can get into big bowl games with a couple of losses simply because they started off ranked very high but only dropped so much. A team with two losses that started the season as #10 can't whereas a team that started off the season as #1 can.
Posted by maturetiger
Member since Apr 2008
117 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:08 pm to
You've got nerve name calling............You lost the most critical game on your schedule AT HOME. OK ST's numbers are better than yours. You sit @ home and watch the SEC Champ game. Can't even win your division. Even with a victory in the BCS Champ game, you only have 12 wins. LSU CURRENTLY has 13 wins. So, Yes, YOU don't deserve it.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46625 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:10 pm to
Uh no almost everyone agrees that osu
resume was better just that Bama passed the eye test better.
Posted by DP40
Swamps and creeks
Member since Nov 2008
9907 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Quote in a recent interview with ESPN reporter

“not to call you guys out, but you sort of started all this talk about a match”


No big deal. It's true.

quote:

He immediately follows this comment with the following:

“I was watching Kentucky and UNC play basketball, and it was a 1 point game, both teams looked like they could probably play for a national Championship,…I bet no one would think it’s a big deal if these 2 teams play again in the Final game”


Uh!!!!!!!!!!!! Nick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.... they have a process after the regular season…for that to happen.. It’s called march madness beginning with Conference tournaments

Alabama was eating popcorn, that was your freaking process of getting in this game..


Actually, you are wrong. The "process" for Bama was winning the rest of their games and letting the BCS process play out.

It worked. Like it has for other one/two-loss teams needing help/luck to get in. '07 ought to be a huge reminder for you.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46625 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:13 pm to
Stop using 07 as a comparison to this year. 07 LSU won the conference title. Bama didn't even win their division
Posted by DP40
Swamps and creeks
Member since Nov 2008
9907 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:18 pm to
Nope. I will use it just fine, thank you.

'07 two loss team needed help AND needed to win their last game to get in. Just cold hard facts.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56205 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

“I was watching Kentucky and UNC play basketball, and it was a 1 point game, both teams looked like they could probably play for a national Championship,…I bet no one would think it’s a big deal if these 2 teams play again in the Final game”


I agree with this 100 percent, and this is why this system works. It gets rid of all the shite in between.

quote:

and Nick’s response today is more like “we’re Alabama, we should be in the MNC game!”..’What’s the big deal?”



Actually, it was nothing like that. But whoever. They are a top 2 team. The BCS is designed to have 1 play 2. It worked to perfection.
Posted by Klingler7
Houston
Member since Nov 2009
11965 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:20 pm to
Son...You and your fellow Alabama fans are a bunch of cheating motherfrickers. It is a shame to think that you feel entitled to anything. If your life revolves around sucking Paul Bryant and Nick Saban's dick, you my friend, are in a sad state of psychological delusion.

Posted by twh318
Member since Dec 2011
493 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

bama1959


Question.....after LSU beats Bama's arse, will you continue to come here and post ignorant shite? Most likely not.
Posted by hawkway
Member since Oct 2008
571 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:29 pm to
Could they at least let him sit in a smaller chair so he looks taller?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260008 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

Uh no almost everyone agrees that osu
resume was better

\
Not really. You said they were better than Bama.


quote:

just that Bama passed the eye test better.



Bama is better.

When LSU beats Bama, is he title illegitimate? Will you bitch because OSU didn't get to play?

Posted by tubucoco
las vegas, nevada
Member since Oct 2007
32994 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:30 pm to
A plus 1 system is being called out more and more, they will eventually have to do something. OSU even though they lost in overtime to Iowa St. had a wonderful season and deserves a shot at the NC, also. The BCS is flawed and they know it. Having the Top 4 square off and the winners advance to the championship is the only way, they wouldn't be anymore debates at the end of the season, and then probably not, people always have something to bitch about.
Posted by MoreOrLes
Member since Nov 2008
19472 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:35 pm to
Apex,
There are many more LSU fans that agree with you than don't.

Rogers been saying the BCS worked but there is more evidence to the contrary and as he pointed out earlier today....If you disagree with his point of view you are either miserable or have an inferiority complex.
Sounds like a gumps retort.
What has happened has happened for money by ESPN with Bama as the beneficiary. the BCS can and was manipulated and will continue to be that way until we as fans demand a playoff system.

Bottom line the rematch is pointless. LSU wins they beat a team they already beat. Bama wins they would be 1-1 vs. LSU. The BCS champ would have less wins than LSU and would not be there conference champs.
It's amazing how ESPN got so many to concentrate on what is a "better loss". while ignoring # of quality wins.
This post was edited on 12/19/11 at 7:38 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260008 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

they wouldn't be anymore debates at the end of the season, and then probably not, people always have something to bitch about.


People would still bitch if this situation was a result of a plus one.
Posted by umpa23
baton
Member since Mar 2008
200 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:37 pm to
The earlier notion that-- because the NCG is suppose to match up #1 and#2 and alabama and lsu are 1 and 2, the teams are both equally deserving... is prb the most absurd thing i have read on here in a while(which is a heavy statement)

Lsu is a unanimous #1. alabama is a somewhat controversial #2. how are they equally deserving..?
No one in america questions LSu being #1 let alone deserving a "shot" at the title.
At the very least for the sake of integrity, admit you are lucky to get a shot at LSU again and hope to make the most of it.
Miles had the respect to say what he said after the game and vote bama #2. the least you can do is give credit where credit is due. LSU is the only team in america that "deserves" to be in the game without question. Thus the MOST(more) deserving team.

If you really think otherwise please expound...
This post was edited on 12/19/11 at 7:42 pm
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56205 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

Bottom line the rematch is pointless


Except for the ol pesky national championship.

quote:

will continue to be that way until we as fans demand a playoff system.
quote:

would have less wins than LSU and would not be there conference champs.


So to make your playoff, you have to be a conference champion. So, the MAC champ is more qualified than the SEC third place team, right.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram