re: Recruiting aside, How do you rate the Pear's understanding of the game of basketball? 1-10

quote:

---

Recruiting aside, How do you rate the Pear's understanding of the game of basketball? 1-10

---

Higher than your IQ

quote:

---

People saying anything less than 6 are retards but then again this is the rant

---

I didn't even arrive at this post before reading streetbawl and "his success depended on talent" posts.


I'm addicted to this terrible forum

Errybody’s coaching depends on talent You really think Pat Riley and Phil Jackson are the best b-ball coaches of all time. Wade isn’t the best Coach either but he is and has done without a doubt a better job than McBland and the future doesn’t look promising. Recruiting is 70% of college sports and WW was in the 90 percentile & MM is in the 10 percentile. He’s got exactly 12-20 months to right the ship.

6, but most of the board all of the sudden thinks it’s 10.

40% of this thread claim he’s dog shite so I dunno how “the board thinks he’s a 10” when not one person has said that is true.

This is how you know the current coach is dog shite. You are starting threads on the previous coach in March.

What’s wrong you can’t count?

I'll go with a 7. His offense was consistently good. Plent of players developed and made tangible improvements while he was here. His defenses were inconsistent from year to year but he did show he could produce a borderline elite defense in his last year. His team played hard for him.

For the people asserting he was less than a 5...just how talented did you think his teams were? You're acting like we had multiple lottery picks and underachieved by losing in the 1st or 2nd round.

quote:

---

Douche couldn’t draw up an inbounds play for shite

---

I liked Wade as what he was a clone of Dale Brown. But I will be fair here, been watching LSU basketball since the Dale days and LSU has never been able to inbound the ball regularly against pressure.