Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

O being coordinator dependent may not be a bad thing.

Posted on 11/29/16 at 1:29 am
Posted by LSUTil_iDie
Lawrenceville, GA
Member since Jan 2012
5511 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 1:29 am
Hear me out.

Yes, we went cheap with O, BUT...this means that we can get the best coordinators because we have that extra money to spend, assuming Alleva opens up the checkbook. We can offer that much more to the coaches and O's pitch to them is easy - I can get the players you need and I won't meddle. And there's always going to be established coordinators and good coordinators looking to move up. LSU is a coaching hotspot just because of the type players that grow in our backyard and our brand so we should never have a problem pulling top notch coaches to work with O.
Posted by Javzz
Member since Jan 2006
1588 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 1:32 am to
If O actually is successful do you think he'll continue to accept a lower salary? We'll also have to depend a guy who has no past history of successful coordinator and coaching hires
Posted by apfour21
New Orleans, LA
Member since Nov 2012
3143 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 1:37 am to
There's a thread on first page about this. I commented in there why I don't agree. LINK

quote:

assuming Alleva opens up the checkbook
I'll believe it when I see it.
Posted by LSUTil_iDie
Lawrenceville, GA
Member since Jan 2012
5511 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 1:39 am to
quote:

coaching hires


Well he brought Hugh Freeze and Frank Wilson up from the high school ranks sooo....
Posted by emanresu
Member since Dec 2009
9355 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 2:04 am to
It also means O has a built-in excuse for staying after a bad season. He's just going to say "we're going to go out and get the best [offensive or defensive] coordinator and fix this problem." And everyone will be so pumped like kids at Christmas dreaming of who the new coordinator might be.

But it's never going to be his job being talked about since he's hands off and the program is coordinator dependent.

It's a built-in ploy to keep your job after bad seasons.
This post was edited on 11/29/16 at 2:06 am
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44541 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 2:24 am to
quote:

quote:

assuming Alleva opens up the checkbook

I'll believe it when I see it.


well, Alleva has actually paid assistants pretty well. we had the highest paid staff, and guys like Cam, Chavis, and Aranda were among the highest paid coordinators in CFB.
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22495 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 5:01 am to
Two things:
1. I haven't spent time looking, but have seen many references to the low salary $$$ CEO is being paid now. Has this been made public? And if so, where? I'm curious, is all.

2. For all the moaning about CEO being dependent on assistants, what has happened to change ranters from all the moaning because CLM would not let his assistants do their jobs coaching, without meddling and mucking things up? It seems like strong coordinators and assistants would make for a better coached team.
Posted by UncleRuckus
Member since Feb 2013
7632 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 5:39 am to
"Coordinator dependent" really means shitty HC
Posted by BallChamp00
Member since May 2015
6355 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 7:39 am to
I'd love to know what coordinator dependent means tbh. Which successful head coach has shitty coordinators?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66344 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 7:48 am to
Have you ever noticed that Saban's defense doesn't really ever drop off. Regardless of who his DC is?

Or Meyer's offense.

Good or bad, they basically are teaching their DCs their systems.
Posted by nola000
Lacombe, LA
Member since Dec 2014
13139 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 8:02 am to
Ive posted this in several other threads before CEO was hired but basically the problem with a HC hire like CEO is that they dont lock-down one side of the ball like was mentioned in the above post about Saban and Meyer.

Most HCs are running either their offensive or defensive systems at their respective schools depending on which side of the ball they came up coaching on. This means they only have to consistently make a good hire on one side of the ball. In Orgerons case he has to consistently make good hires on BOTH sides of the ball. This can lead to wildly inconsistent teams year-to-year.

Good coordinators dont stick around for long. They prove themselves as coordinators and then get their own HC jobs. When you have, say a Dave Aranda as HC, at least you never have to worry about the defensive side of the ball.

Im not saying CEO cant have success Ive just been arguing that its a really big gamble and not a smart approach to building a consistent winner.
This post was edited on 11/29/16 at 8:04 am
Posted by BallChamp00
Member since May 2015
6355 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 9:24 am to
So Dan Mullen to Addazio.
Then Herman to Beck.

Yea they are garbage OC's.

3 are head coaches and 1 will be.
Posted by BallChamp00
Member since May 2015
6355 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 9:25 am to
Seems like Meyer surrounds himself with great coordinators. Is he coordinator dependent?
Posted by DontCare
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2012
2516 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 9:48 am to
I've been making the following point for the past two weeks:

We have had an offensive-minded HC for what, 12 years?

Wasn't the biggest criticism of Miles that the offense was stagnant and predictable because he wouldn't allow his OC out from under his thumb?

Now, over the course of the coaching search, do we really want the same situation, even if Jimbo and Herman are considered top offensive minds at present?

I, for one, actually want a CEO/principal style HC. Offenses and defenses change over time. What's effective today won't always be as effective. Take the option, for instance—it was unstoppable when it first came on the scene, but it's mostly been figured out. Likewise, the read option has been many teams' kryptonite, but defenses have evolved to compensate and mitigate its effectiveness.

With a CEO, the offenses and defenses can change with trends. If a style no longer works, then the coordinator who's married to it either has to keep up with the times by changing or the team will move on.

This is why I am happy about O, but I would have preferred a CEO type of coach over a play-caller if we had that option with any other prospective coach.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66344 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 9:50 am to
The problem is successful Coordinators are just as likely to take a HC job somewhere as an upward Coordinator job.

We aren't just competitive with other P5 school for Coordinators we are competitive with non-P5 school who are offering HC jobs
Posted by DontCare
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2012
2516 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 9:56 am to
quote:

SammyTiger

Aranda.

Checkmate.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66344 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 10:34 am to
That's not a checkmate. That's 1 win. If O is going to have long term success here he is going to have to Keep winning these battles. Go look at the top offenses. A lot of theme aren't a young smart OC. They are a young smart HC who used to be an OC.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram