Started By
Message

re: Note to Out of State Alums

Posted on 8/26/10 at 8:13 pm to
Posted by LSUMafia
Member since May 2005
9862 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 8:13 pm to
I still do not understand any justification for those out of staters bitching about this. You have absolutely no leg to stand on and the fact this program existed is utter stupidity.

Legacy things are stupid. Plain and simple. If you want to get in state tuition at LSU live in Louisiana and pay your taxes. If you chose to leave the state to make more money or get away from the corruption, thus bringing almost NOTHING back to the state outside of you going around acting like a cheerleader, why should the State do anything for you?

Again, you left the state for greener pastures, and shouldn't be given handouts/benefits because of it. This is a brilliant move by Martin.

Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
24258 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 8:25 pm to
Looks like my money and my kids are going to the University of Texas.

Hook'em Horns
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

Looks like my money and my kids are going to the University of Texas.



That's probably a great decision. These budget cuts are going to cripple LSU for years.
Posted by AFTiger
DC
Member since Feb 2007
448 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

Looks like my money and my kids are going to the University of Texas.

Hook'em Horns


Likewise, though that was going to happen anyway...but to the poster who thinks the Legacy cuts are a great idea, ponder this--it's not just about providing a monetary benefit to alumni (though that's certainly an effect); a university becomes immeasurably stronger by attracting talented students and professors from around the world. This program was one way to allow outstanding students whose parents moved away to attend LSU rather than taking their talents elsewhere. LSU has incredible potential to make a run at Top 50 status as an academic and research institution; while I understand why the Chancellor made the decision here, I believe it may have some seriously detrimental long-term effects down the line. I hope I am wrong.
Posted by geraldthemouse
Pearland, TX
Member since Mar 2009
482 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 8:50 pm to
My son is now SOL.
Posted by geraldthemouse
Pearland, TX
Member since Mar 2009
482 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 8:52 pm to
My guess is you live in Louisiana. You should offer to pay out of state fees also.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

I still do not understand any justification for those out of staters bitching about this. You have absolutely no leg to stand on and the fact this program existed is utter stupidity.


The program existed to attract kids that might otherwise not attend LSU. If the school is at capacity, great, otherwise this is a net loss.
Posted by The Yetty
Member since Feb 2005
12542 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:09 pm to
Well, this sucks. I had that scholarship. I guess I'll be shelling out some cash for my kids to attend LSU.
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

Legacy things are stupid. Plain and simple

I wouldn't call it stupid. But one thing that always struck me was that if a state school gave special treatment to people because they are say, a minority, it tends to be found unconsitutionall and people complain that it should be based strictly on merit. (not taking a position on that either way - that's more poli board material). But wouldn't this be subject to the same principal. I understand the difference constitutionally because its not a "suspect category" but wouldn't it be another instance of special treatment for something other than merit?
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:18 pm to
Considering the large alumni base out of state (larger than most other state schools), this may piss some people off. Pisses me off.
Posted by Geauxtiga
No man's land
Member since Jan 2008
34377 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

IMO this is a very bad thing

Not me. Why give money to out-of-Staters for them to leave Louisiana after they graduate?
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

Not me. Why give money to out-of-Staters for them to leave Louisiana after they graduate?


But do you really think this is an incentive to stay? It's not. What college graduate is thinking about paying for his kids college?
Posted by Geauxtiga
No man's land
Member since Jan 2008
34377 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

But do you really think this is an incentive to stay? It's not.
Yeah, thought about that after I sent it off. Not much in Louisiana to stay for.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9191 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:25 pm to

LSU is shooting themselves in the foot on this deal.

I understand the need to use this scholarship money to be apportioned on a merit basis and bring in higher qualified applicants, rather than on a legacy basis.

But it will lower overall enrollment and also may affect some donations from out of state alumni moving forward.
Posted by Deathvalley71
Dallas
Member since Oct 2004
811 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:26 pm to
__________________________
Looks like my money and my kids are going to the University of Texas.

Hook'em Horns

___________________________

Same here, there goes the legacy, I'm not paying out of state for my kid to go to LSU, I love LSU, but the school just isn't good enough to justify that cost. There are alot of LSU alumni in Texas, alot of Season Ticket holders, alot of people who donate to the school, this is going to piss them off.
Posted by LSUMafia
Member since May 2005
9862 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

But one thing that always struck me was that if a state school gave special treatment to people because they are say, a minority, it tends to be found unconsitutionall and people complain that it should be based strictly on merit. (not taking a position on that either way - that's more poli board material). But wouldn't this be subject to the same principal.


This is a large part of my point.

To the guy asking if I am in Louisiana? I am not. I am developing my career elsewhere. I made that choice, and while I hope to potentially move back, until then, I should be paying out of state tuition for my kids. That was a choice I made.

As for it bringing "outstanding kids" to LSU. Believe that your kids are "outstanding". If they were, I am sorry but despite my love for LSU, you should be sending your "outstanding" kids to programs that fit their needs and skills. As long as LSU continues to allow its student body to grow so large, it will not improve. Period.

If your kid is so "outstanding" they should be getting full scholarships OR some type of merit scholarship that didn't have something to do with Mommy or Daddy going to LSU.

Fact is if LSU wants to move into the top 50, they need to shrink their undergrad enrollment and more than double their graduate student enrollment. That is how you increase in these "rankings". PERIOD. No school with 4,000 grad students in a student body of 36,000 (less than ~12% of the entire student body) being graduate students is going to be in the top 50.

Posted by Lou the Jew from LSU
Member since Oct 2006
4694 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:27 pm to
How short sighted LSUMafia. I had one in LSU, using the legacy, but she left for UNO because the budget cuts had been so drastic. I have another in LSU Grad school, that will leave the state in a year because of no other options. I love LA, but with no opportunities I had to leave 20 yrs ago. I still go back for games and family, but it ain't the same.
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

Yeah, thought about that after I sent it off. Not much in Louisiana to stay for.


It's not really that, it's the fact that most starting job offers will take kids almost anywhere. Most of the time, that's not LA.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9191 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:30 pm to

quote:

As for it bringing "outstanding kids" to LSU


If the kids are "outstanding" then they should qualify for merit based scholarships and this point is moot.

Who it effects are kids who do not have high enough GPA and SAT to receive merit based scholarships and have to pay their own way.
Posted by Lou the Jew from LSU
Member since Oct 2006
4694 posts
Posted on 8/26/10 at 9:32 pm to
I guess they will no longer solicit or accept donations and contributions from out of state also. What say you?
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram