Started By
Message

re: New Look Helmets

Posted on 4/5/14 at 4:37 pm to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66491 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 4:37 pm to
MY opinion would be not to change it, but i really love the new logo. It is exactly the logo they should have rolled out in 2003 instead of toonces

I think i don't like the change just because i don't like change, but you know in my opinion it is like the saints logo change. same effect a little more compact.

Also the tiger on the logo has only been there for like what 30 years? it wasn't there since 1860 or anything.
Posted by Slippy
Across the rivah
Member since Aug 2005
6580 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 4:46 pm to
The new design is symmetrical and much easier to translate with an embroidery machine. Cheaper to put on shirts.

It's all about the Hamiltons, baby.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

The new one is much better. Much cleaner.


Posted by Coater
Madison, MS
Member since Jun 2005
33060 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 4:58 pm to
Posted by AndrewD
Member since Oct 2013
709 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 6:51 pm to
It doesnt look good. Nothing about the LSU uniform matches but that what makes it LSU. the purples dont match, the golds dont match. Subtle irregularity is part of the LSU brand. It's a french aesthetic that would take a long time to explain. The tiger eye is not a stencil, its slightly different every game. It's not some jackass out there with a ruler trying to get it to look perfect. Of course Nike can always sell new crap so they are going to keep screwing up the uniform as much as they can every year. And the AD doesn't care, he's not an LSU guy.

And they didn't "clean it up". It's just a poorly vectorized version - terrible technique. They put in bigger, softer, rounder curves and removed every sharp line. What else has bigger softer and rounder curves? Women, toys and fat people. Not a good look for a helmet logo.
This post was edited on 4/6/14 at 6:12 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84856 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 6:54 pm to
i'm fine with this very minor update but they need to be very careful about changes to the helmet
Posted by AndrewD
Member since Oct 2013
709 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 6:58 pm to
When Bertman was AD, he had unveiled the "new" helmets at a press conference. They were exactly like the old helmets. That's the way it should be.
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
19688 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

MrLegit


You should change your username to MrsNotLegit b/c you're just bitching to hear yourself bitch.
Posted by burbank
Member since Oct 2010
596 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:08 pm to
I'm STILL trying to. See any diff.
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4776 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

Y'all sound like a bunch of hormonal women bitching about what color this what font that


There's always some "look how tough I am" frickstick that has to make this comment in a thread like this.
Posted by extremetigerfanatic
Denham Springs
Member since Oct 2003
5364 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:33 pm to
Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the original tiger head on the helmet from a picture that someone took from the original Mike the Tiger Mascot, or something like that. They riled him up and snapped a shot and used that photo to make the helmet? I always thought that was a cool bit of history surrounding the helmet.

But I am not upset at the update. Looks nice.
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38231 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:37 pm to
Yeah a guy went into/up to Mike's cage and drew him up close and personal for the logo.
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
18072 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

I just wish they could get the purple on the helmet to match the purple on the unis.



It reads as black on TV. You can barely tell it's purple even when you see the stripes/letters up close and in person.
Posted by AndrewD
Member since Oct 2013
709 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:48 pm to
Not sure if that's true but it's a good story. A logo that looks like a real tiger is better than a logo that looks like a toy. Maybe it's an unpopular sentiment but anybody who reads this rant can name 10 great football programs that never change their helmet logo. Winning teams don't have to do that and they shouldn't. I could live with the wrong looking shoulder stripes and stretched numbers last year, but this seems like its going to continue to happen every year. We should focus on winning games first instead of selling merchandise.
This post was edited on 4/5/14 at 9:03 pm
Posted by F16HT1N6 T163R5
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
339 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:52 pm to
I hope the Geaux font is eventually going on the helmets.

Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
65944 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:53 pm to
They both look good
Posted by plance
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2007
1593 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:55 pm to
Love the new logo. For most people outside LA, they'll think it's the old one.
When I was in Chattanooga (pre-LSU) I thought the old logo looked like a chrysanthemum.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67079 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:57 pm to
I prefer the old helmet tiger, but that's still a great logo and I would not appose to sporting it on any of my clothes.
Posted by PatMac1
San Antonio
Member since Nov 2009
109 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:58 pm to
Too symmetrical. Looks like the circus.
Posted by ByteMe
Member since Sep 2003
22348 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

I'm STILL trying to. See any diff.


Yeah, they look Identical.

quote:


first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram