Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

LSU would have lost that game last year

Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:45 am
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61888 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:45 am
TCU stacked 8/9 guys in the box against our two back sets. We could not run consistently against that. Last year, we would have just rammed our heads right into it. This year we actually passed on early downs and let the passing game take advantage of what the defense was giving up. I was at the game, way up top, and could watch the defensive alignments. The first deep ball we completed, TCU literally had all 11 defenders within 7 yards of the line of scrimmage.

Last night definitely showed a shift in offensive philosophy. I expect us to be a run first team, but teams will not be allowed to ignore the passing game like they have in the past.
Posted by GeauxPack81
Member since Dec 2009
10482 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:49 am to
quote:

LSU would have lost that game last year
agreed
Posted by TthomasJR
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2006
17277 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:50 am to
Yup. Would have been the UF game
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20446 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:50 am to
Agreed.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61888 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:53 am to
The SEC Rant has to hate it, The Decline is off!
Posted by Geaux Tahel
Member since Feb 2006
6632 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:56 am to
quote:

The SEC Rant has to hate it, The Decline is off!


Team anti-LSU has to regroup
Posted by tiger88
Member since Jan 2006
1041 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:56 am to
Agree. Despite some of the miscues, I haven't seen a much better LSU opener in many years. The biggest game changer is, yes, Mettenberger's development since last season and a different offensive philosophy, but the former allows the latter to be possible. New OC definitely helps, too.

The only thing that bothered me last night was that Mett threw the ball away a lot -- which yes, I'm glad he didn't throw any INTs -- but that is either a testament to TCU's defense or Mett not seeing those opportunities to connect as much as he should.

Obviously, the next few games will confirm just where he is...BUT

overall I liked what I saw for an opener.
This post was edited on 9/1/13 at 9:58 am
Posted by LSU Groupee
Member since Oct 2012
4026 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 9:57 am to
quote:

LSU would have lost that game last year


Yeah, we have lost so many season openers or OOC regular season games the past tens years.
Posted by tlsu15
Capital of Texas
Member since Aug 2011
10023 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Yeah, we have lost so many season openers or OOC regular season games the past tens years.



Dude, that game was very similar to the Clemson game at the end of last year. Only this year when LSU made mistakes to let TCU back into the game, they responded by staying calm and putting the team away for good. That's a tremendous improvement and a good sign of things to come this year!
Posted by Geaux Tahel
Member since Feb 2006
6632 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Yeah, we have lost so many season openers or OOC regular season games the past tens years.


I don't think the timing (opening game) or opponent (OOC) has anything to do with the point he made.
Posted by GarmischTiger
Humboldt County
Member since Mar 2007
6609 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Posted by LSU Groupee
You missed the shite out of the OP's point.
Posted by dat yat
Chef Pass
Member since Jun 2011
4317 posts
Posted on 9/1/13 at 10:17 am to
I agree that the offense is much improved. We can still run as always, but finally have a reliable passing attack. This team will be fun to watch.

But I still think we would have beat them last year in an ugly slugfest.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram