Started By
Message

re: Let's Laugh at Bleacher Report - September 9th Edition

Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:27 pm to
Posted by Tigerdev
Member since Feb 2013
12287 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:27 pm to
So basically they dont even watch our games and still comment on us.
Posted by RANDY44
Member since Aug 2005
9572 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Then USC is heralded as the Trojans of 2005 for beating #13 Stanford in very ugly fashion and they jump LSU.


And for those who did not watch it, Stanford BLEW that game big time.
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
72874 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

God the media is laughable


I would use that term very loosely with these lazy clowns. And USC looked like dogshit to me. We would straight up kick their arse.
Posted by DamnStrong1860
The Second City
Member since Oct 2012
3000 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

"LSU has no answer at WR"


I don't read Bleacher Report so I never quite understood the hate that it gets on the Rant until now.

How you gonna sell a team based on "No answers at Wide Receiver" and a shakey quarterback situation and at the same time show highlights of the QB's chuckin it all over the field and WR's making great catches. Wat?
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53769 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

And USC looked like dog shite to me. We would straight up kick their arse.


Stanford got inside the trojan 30 9 times in that game and only mustered 10 pts.

USC is very lucky to have won that game. Missed Kicks, turn overs, penalty (block) that took back a TD etc..

Love the UF highlight of "their offense beginning to click" with video clip of the running back running through a hole 12 yards wide and goes 70 untouched. LOL



Posted by theone
LSU
Member since Nov 2005
1809 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 2:57 pm to
wow. I would bet my house that USC doesn't make the championship game. Seriously.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

"LSU has no answer at WR"
As they are showing highlights of multiple receivers making great plays.
Posted by BayouBengal99
Crowley
Member since Oct 2007
9112 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:08 pm to
Wow just wow??? No clue these clowns have no clue!! Please SEC please have this same mindset when you come to play LSU!! Pretty please!! USC is a joke, ND?? even Stanford looked ugly but at least they drove the ball up and down the field. USC will lose at least 3 games. Ucla is another joke. We all know Oregon is a gimmick offense and when they face a team as fast and can punch em in the mouth they quit. LSU is obviously the biggest sleeper team in America. I can count about 7 or 8 guys that should of been 5 stars or were in last years class. LF, MD, BH, Trey Q, Trevonte V, Clifton G, Adams and Ed Paris. Also many 4 stars should of been 6.0, Darrel Williams is one and Sione T should of been higher. If we would of gotten Speedy, Gerold, the CB from Tx and the big tackle, man??? Our coaches did a tremendous job last year.
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11286 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:09 pm to
It's a outrage-fwd-click me article and it's working.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53769 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:11 pm to
Must have gotten their agenda cliff notes and went with it...

Just dumb to buy or sell much of anything this point of the year anyways

But Selling LSU after looking great start to finish really is hard to explain.

Dumb

Makes we want to start a fight with these guys
Posted by Sampson
Chicago
Member since Mar 2012
24561 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:20 pm to
I'm currently having a healthy discussion with Mr Felder on twitter. He just told me we are "one dimensional." I told him 489 passing yards with 460 rushing yards in the first 2 games isn't one dimensional.
Posted by harry coleman beast
Left Field
Member since Aug 2008
52210 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

I'm currently having a healthy discussion with Mr Felder on twitter. He just told me we are "one dimensional." I told him 489 passing yards with 460 rushing yards in the first 2 games isn't one dimensional.


Maybe he has inside info
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

LSUmakemewanna



OMG. I just finally read the tattoo in your sig image.

No regrets? None? Is he sure about that?....
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26620 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:24 pm to
I read Bleacher Report because I get a lot of talk about other teams from interns and reporters who specifically cover them. Also they get some nice gift and vid links from game day highlights. I like the recruiting coverage as well.

I have since hated every one of their paid staff writers for CFB though, because they are getting worse by the article/video.

These are the same morons who were licking UCLA's nuts with every other media retard. While I have USC as a darkhorse, they have done nothing to warrant the praise. ND played a terrible Michigan team at home and Rice, now people have them right outside of the playoff.

The media's knee-jerk reactions from one day to the next are like whiplash from an accident.
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 3:50 pm
Posted by Walt OReilly
Poplarville, MS
Member since Oct 2005
124299 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:27 pm to
That's embarrassing
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26620 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

I'll be honest, first, I didn't watch much of the game saturday night, so you all will likely come after me. Besides Dural, what other recievers have really done anything. I know Diarse did well in a couple targets against Wisconsin, but what have you guys seen at WR that gives you such hope against better secondary's.


3 of Diarse's 4 catches have been on third down. Every single one of his catches, he has bullied his way to a first down. Him and Quinn look great running routes. Quinn has incredible hands, goes over the middle, and has legit speed. Dupre came in a few times and score on a TD pass in full extension.

We are loaded at WR.
Posted by nycajun
Nothin' could be finer.....
Member since Dec 2004
18183 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

We are loaded at WR

And that's before you consider LF's ability as a downfield receiver out of the backfield.
Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10173 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:45 pm to
I believe this will be the best GROUP of wide recievers ever to play at LSU at one time.
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
18176 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 3:47 pm to
Who the frick are these clowns?
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
32851 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

So you're just not watching the games or what? Darrel Williams had more touches than LF.





He must be one of the bleacher report guys....the ones that talk about LSU without having watched their games.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram