- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I love Booger's philosophy but...
Posted on 12/2/23 at 8:58 pm
Posted on 12/2/23 at 8:58 pm
I don't think the committee believes it. He said the games played should matter more than the eye test. Point was UGA was favored today and Oregon was favored last night. It's the record that should matter not whether the roster is healthy for the next game.
27
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:00 pm to Teufelhunden
That’s 100% what it should be. He said it perfectly.
What’s the point of playing the games? If you want the most talented teams then may as well just put down Georgia, Bama, Ohio State and Michigan every year.
What’s the point of playing the games? If you want the most talented teams then may as well just put down Georgia, Bama, Ohio State and Michigan every year.
This post was edited on 12/2/23 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:00 pm to Teufelhunden
quote:The problem is the committee is explicitly told to adjust for injuries
I don't think the committee believes it
Booger’s opinion is cool and all but that’s just like his opinion, man
This post was edited on 12/2/23 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:00 pm to Teufelhunden
Booger watches college football throughout the year and is well-qualified to opine on the matter.
The same can not be said for the committee
The same can not be said for the committee
This post was edited on 12/2/23 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:00 pm to Teufelhunden
He’s right, but he is also against a playoff expansion so he’s just bullshitting
This post was edited on 12/2/23 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:01 pm to Teufelhunden
FSU wins this game and they’re in. The second string will be back for the playoffs. He went into a tough environment in Gainesville and pulled out the W.
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:01 pm to Teufelhunden
Booger is spot on. This isn't a beauty pagent. You can't make an argument that the "4 best teams should be in", because then it becomes a subjective, opinionated "eye test".
It has to be based on facts: Resume. Wins. Losses. Head to head match ups.
It has to be based on facts: Resume. Wins. Losses. Head to head match ups.
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:02 pm to Teufelhunden
His theory is garbage. FSU is not a Top 4 team, but don't worry we'll give them a shot and get boat raced by UW so no one feels bad.
Records matter but when you lose your #1 QB and your 2nd and 3rd QB are terrible, that should mean something.
Records matter but when you lose your #1 QB and your 2nd and 3rd QB are terrible, that should mean something.
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:04 pm to Teufelhunden
Power-rankings is a horrible method for filling a bracket.
Booger is right.
Booger is right.
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:04 pm to Teufelhunden
quote:
I don't think the committee believes it
They put an undefeated Notre Dame in multiple times, Cincinnati in, TCU in, etc knowing good and well those teams would get thrashed in the playoffs.
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:05 pm to MadtownTiger
quote:
Records matter but when you lose your #1 QB and your 2nd and 3rd QB are terrible, that should mean something.
If we were undefeated and Daniels went down, there is a 0% chance you’d be saying we should be left out
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:06 pm to lsufball19
TCU is a prime example of why “the most deserving” team should not be in over a team with a great resume in a better conference
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:07 pm to Teufelhunden
He’s wrong unless you got an agenda for not playing one of the better teams right now than FSU. To put FSU in would be a huge financial loss
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:07 pm to lsufball19
Welll that’s because Nuss wouldn’t piss down his leg for 3 points against a mediocre Louisville team that lost to Kentucky.
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:07 pm to Teufelhunden
FSU would be the obvious first team eliminated…
CFB fans deserve a better 4 team playoff.
CFB fans deserve a better 4 team playoff.
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:08 pm to lsutiger2011
TCU upset Michigan in the first round. Stupid take
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:08 pm to lsutiger2011
quote:
TCU is a prime example of why “the most deserving” team should not be in over a team with a great resume in a better conference
a team that won a playoff game is your example of who should NOT get in?
really.
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:08 pm to lsutiger2011
quote:
TCU is a prime example of why “the most deserving” team should not be in over a team with a great resume in a better conference
They’re a prime example of how the committee has actually voted
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:09 pm to LSURep864
It wouldn’t be Nuss. It would be Ricky Collins with Nuss coming back for the playoffs.
You don’t even know what’s going on
You don’t even know what’s going on
Posted on 12/2/23 at 9:09 pm to LSURep864
quote:
Welll that’s because Nuss wouldn’t piss down his leg for 3 points against a mediocre Louisville team that lost to Kentucky.
The guy starting tonight wouldn’t be starting in the CFP either. And you need to view this from the point of Collins, our 3rd string, starting, not Nuss if you want to talk about what’s going on tonight. We’d struggle to score too with Collins playing
This post was edited on 12/2/23 at 9:11 pm
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News