Started By
Message

I just want to confirm the story of why LSU did not pull the trigger last year.

Posted on 9/27/16 at 8:58 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118853 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 8:58 am
Summer through the fall of 2015: F. King Alexander is in a tough LSU funding fight with the state who is having its own fiscal issues.

Les Miles gets on the coaching hot seat after the 3 loss debacles to Alabama, Arkansas and Ole Miss.

Joe Alleva and TAF boosters make a push to fire miles. The most substantial rumor is that Jimbo was ready to make the move from FSU to LSU after the 2015 season.

Les Miles gets an emotional response from the team and fans at the aTm game that many thought would be Les's last game.

Given the fact that F. King and Bobby Jindal were under a lot of pressure through the year due to budget constraints Jindal stepped into the coaching situation and put pressure on F. King to nix the deal. The assumption is that F. King and Jindal were worried about the perception of spending money to buy out Les and hire a new coach while the university is struggling with budget issues. Even though the funds for education come from a totally different bucket than the athletic department, Jindal and F. King were still worried about the negative perception of their fiduciary responsibilities.

So they nixed the deal.

I'm just trying to understand the timeline and facts. Does that about sum it up? Please correct any information I have wrong or include any info I omitted.
This post was edited on 9/27/16 at 9:00 am
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120321 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 8:59 am to
Allegedly pretty much true
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 8:59 am to
Pretty much.

If everyone cant have nice things no one can have nice things.

More government please
This post was edited on 9/27/16 at 9:01 am
Posted by gumbeaux
Member since Jun 2004
4467 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:04 am to
I just don't understand the negative perception of the buyout. Why can't LSU come out with a statement that any buyout comes from private funds and does not impact the budget?

Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11166 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:04 am to
What these dumbasses fail to realize is that putting a good football product on the field is one of the best things for university and the state.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118853 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Allegedly pretty much true


Yeah, because I was listening to Mike and Mike and Ryan Clark this morning and they were being critical of the LSU Admin for not firing Les last year. They totally omitted the fiscal pressures surrounding the university last year. If the state were not under such fiscal pressure (due to low oil prices, thus lower tax revenues) Les's would have easily been fired last year.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66948 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:07 am to
That's what was reported in the advocate. It was stupid then and it looks just as dumb now. Thanks Jindal
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118853 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:09 am to
quote:

I just don't understand the negative perception of the buyout. Why can't LSU come out with a statement that any buyout comes from private funds and does not impact the budget?



That makes total sense however Jindal and F. King apparently thought they did not have the political capital to fight that battle when Jindal and the state legislature was making budget cuts all over the state.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118853 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:10 am to
quote:

What these dumbasses fail to realize is that putting a good football product on the field is one of the best things for university and the state.


I agree.
Posted by TLit
Orange, TX
Member since Sep 2016
50 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:12 am to
There's also a rumor some people reached out to Jimbo last year and he said no. Making the decision to bring back Miles easier on the administrations part.

Regardless, it should have been done last year, but the power-to-be were spineless, at best.

If you have enough cause to fire a coach 4 games into the year, you had enough cause last year. Not a good look and not good for the kids.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84995 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:13 am to
You know who could answer this question? Alleva.

I guess we can ask him when he decides to address it.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118853 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:14 am to
quote:

There's also a rumor some people reached out to Jimbo last year and he said no.


Good point. I do remember this too.
Posted by 13
Member since Apr 2006
1387 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:15 am to
I'm not sure it was Jindal, he wouldn't be the governor that would have to ask for the funding.... but I'm not certain it was t him.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84995 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:16 am to
quote:

That makes total sense however Jindal and F. King apparently thought they did not have the political capital to fight that battle when Jindal and the state legislature was making budget cuts all over the state.


Lay out the timing of the payments and the source of the funds. The truth is easily defended.
Posted by emanresu
Member since Dec 2009
9372 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:17 am to
Alleva and King were on board with the firing. Word got back to Jindal, who threatened King with reducing LSUs budget, so King told Alleva to hold off.
This post was edited on 9/27/16 at 11:19 am
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:19 am to
I think honor code chimed in too
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
31084 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Allegedly pretty much true


and

quote:

What these dumbasses fail to realize is that putting a good football product on the field is one of the best things for university and the state.
Posted by 756
Member since Sep 2004
14874 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:20 am to

OP---some of the truth but not all the truth. Aleva had leeway to hire Jimbo- he fumbled the ball and mishandled the negotiations creating a total PR nightmare for LSU- At halftime a meeting was held with board members and the decision was made to keep Les

There are other details- but the bottom line is if Aleva was out of his skill set in trying to negotiate with the best agent in football.

He does not need to be alone in the room negotiating.
This post was edited on 9/27/16 at 9:21 am
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
39147 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:20 am to
quote:

I'm just trying to understand the timeline and facts. Does that about sum it up? Please correct any information I have wrong or include any info I omitted.


While I do not know it to be true, there was another rumor I believed. There was rumor that Jimbo's agent, Slimy McCashgouger, came back the day before the aTm game and demanded another million per year.

This was the tipping point on abandoning ship from a situation that had already become such an abortion.

While it was rumor, I believe it.
Posted by Hoovertigah
Fayetteville
Member since Sep 2013
3046 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:22 am to
Squeaky wheel or something...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram