- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Game was not lost because of the int...
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:36 pm
In my personal opinion, the game was not lost because of the no int call. I think people need to get over this. It is part of the game. If the refs didn't see it our way, then they didnt. To me, what cost us the game was two things: the fact that we didnt continue to put pressure on McElroy with blitzes and the fact that we had so many unneccessay penalties. Again, this is just my opinion. Agree, disagree?
27
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:37 pm to PistolFan
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:37 pm to PistolFan
the only way for people to get over things is for it to stop being fricking posted every 5 minutes.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:38 pm to PistolFan
injuries + all the non penalty calls and bs ball spots this would of been a different game
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:39 pm to BigErn
quote:
the only way for people to get over things is for it to stop being fricking posted every 5 minutes
True.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:39 pm to PistolFan
The entire point of the debate is that the game should have been decided by the players, not the officiating. It's as simple as that. 
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:39 pm to PistolFan
Didn't help either.
We did not lose the game because we could not pressure Mc. We lost because of momentum swings, personnel inconsistencies and __________??
We did not lose the game because we could not pressure Mc. We lost because of momentum swings, personnel inconsistencies and __________??
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:41 pm to PistolFan
I'll bite, it wasn't necessarily lost because of the call, but we were deprived of a chance to win because of it.
Who would have thought with 8 minutes left at Georgia that we would put together over an 80yd drive for the go-ahead score?
I think what people are more aggravated about is the number of crucial plays that we were screwed on. Their go-ahead score was an obvious block in the back......take those 7pts back and the ballgame may be different.
Who would have thought with 8 minutes left at Georgia that we would put together over an 80yd drive for the go-ahead score?
I think what people are more aggravated about is the number of crucial plays that we were screwed on. Their go-ahead score was an obvious block in the back......take those 7pts back and the ballgame may be different.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:42 pm to PistolFan
quote:
In my personal opinion, the game was not lost because of the no int call.
Agree
quote:
I think people need to get over this. It is part of the game.
On the field yes but this is what instant replay was supposed to fix. If replay is not going to solve the on field errors by officials, do away with it and stop delaying the game.
quote:
we had so many unneccessay penalties
Part of what has everyone concerned.
This post was edited on 11/11/09 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:43 pm to GiantNibblets
You are correct. Not having your starting QB, tailback, TE. and cornerback at crucial times. plus other injuries.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:43 pm to PistolFan
quote:
Game was not lost because of the int...
But Alabama managed to seal the victory because of it. The injuries to Scott and Peterson had more to do with the loss than anything Alabama did. Jones never makes that play with Peterson on him, the uncalled block in the back notwithstanding. Give 'Bama credit for feeding JJ the ball when they realized Peterson and Eugene were both nursing injuries on the sideline.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:45 pm to PistolFan
I agree that you're an attention whore for creating a thread to voice an opinion that has already been mentioned ten billion times in the last few days.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:46 pm to Doc Fenton
He reeled you in....
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:46 pm to PistolFan
quote:xiv alter
PistolFan
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:48 pm to PistolFan
Correct, the INT didn't cost us the game by itself.
But the call was missed.
/thread
But the call was missed.
/thread
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:48 pm to RANDY44
quote:
Alabama managed to seal the victory
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:50 pm to PistolFan
The refs did NOT see the play at all...so their first instinct is to keep Bama undefeated for Florida
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:52 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
I agree that you're an attention whore for creating a thread to voice an opinion that has already been mentioned ten billion times in the last few days.
No dude, I was sitting here thinking "I wonder what Pistolfan thinks about all this?"
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:55 pm to USMCTiger03
didn't lose the game for lsu. just robbed them of the chance to win it
Posted on 11/11/09 at 12:57 pm to PistolFan
quote:
In my personal opinion, the game was not lost because of the no int call. I think people need to get over this. It is part of the game. If the refs didn't see it our way, then they didnt. To me, what cost us the game was two things: the fact that we didnt continue to put pressure on McElroy with blitzes and the fact that we had so many unneccessay penalties. Again, this is just my opinion. Agree, disagree?
I guess you aren't a big believer that giving Bama a second chance on a clear turnover, giving them the opportunity to make it a 2-score game and being robbed of the opportunity of swinging the momentum back in our favor had much of an effect on the outcome? Like it or not, the outcome of MANY games in many sports in the course of history hinge on one single play.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News