- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PS4 vs Xbox One & Curren Gen vs Next Gen, Graphics Comparison (BF4)
Posted on 11/2/13 at 6:46 pm to Jakeyura
Posted on 11/2/13 at 6:46 pm to Jakeyura
They have a sharpening filter, so it even "looks better" than the PC version, too.
But, oversharpening can really highlight aliasing issues:
Also, PS4 seems more blurry because of the supposed method of anti-aliasing they're using.
But, oversharpening can really highlight aliasing issues:
Also, PS4 seems more blurry because of the supposed method of anti-aliasing they're using.
4
Posted on 11/2/13 at 6:55 pm to Bunta
ohhh ok, makes sense. And I wasn't trying to troll or anything it was a serious question.
I think lew thought I was trolling.
I think lew thought I was trolling.
Posted on 11/2/13 at 6:57 pm to Jakeyura
I was wondering how it was going to take to get here. There was a lot of fudge going on in these comparisons (because assumptions were made when they rendered the images as they don't actually have the console versions to play).
Posted on 11/2/13 at 6:59 pm to Bunta
quote:
Bunta
DF caught a lot of crap for this comparison. I really don't care I don't intend on buying any of FPS, but as you posted, there was definitely some non-X1 footage used as X1 footage.
Posted on 11/2/13 at 7:04 pm to Bunta
Holy aliasing, batman
Posted on 11/2/13 at 7:05 pm to Bunta
Eurogamer's Summary
They make it sound like the PS4 version is noticeably better, but I still don't see a difference between the two when they are running in motion. There some very, very minor differences in still photos, but when everything's moving at ~60fps, will anyone notice?
They make it sound like the PS4 version is noticeably better, but I still don't see a difference between the two when they are running in motion. There some very, very minor differences in still photos, but when everything's moving at ~60fps, will anyone notice?
This post was edited on 11/2/13 at 7:07 pm
Posted on 11/2/13 at 7:15 pm to TheBuescherMan
quote:
They make it sound like the PS4 version is noticeably better
Idk about noticeably, but it will be better, that's already been established. Just how much is unclear...
Posted on 11/2/13 at 7:22 pm to TheBuescherMan
quote:
There some very, very minor differences in still photos, but when everything's moving at ~60fps, will anyone notice?
Very few will notice. It'll be tough to know unless you're just looking at comparison screenshots.
Posted on 11/2/13 at 7:24 pm to QuackerBacker
Having read the summary and watched the comparisons the difference is marginal at best. PS4 has undisputed power advantage but it doesn't translate very well (yet). Where I'd look for the big differences is first party games because there won't be much to see with these multiplatform games.
Posted on 11/2/13 at 7:31 pm to sbr2
Right, that and the BF4 devs just didn't have enough time to get it perfect for next gen but didn't want to delay it like the other games and that is actually a good decision IMO been too many delays already
Posted on 11/2/13 at 7:39 pm to ILikeLSUToo
quote:
Holy aliasing, batman
They don't know what that is.
Posted on 11/2/13 at 8:05 pm to brucevilanch
peasants
Posted on 11/2/13 at 8:59 pm to Jakeyura
The Xbox One looks like it has some deeper black levels or something.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 6:42 am to The Sad Banana
XBONE 
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:39 am to Jakeyura
XB1 has terrible dark textures contrasts, at least for BF4.
Other than that, they both look the same.
Other than that, they both look the same.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:49 am to Jakeyura
I wouldn't put much stock in those videos. Youtube is a terrible host for high quality videos with their compression issues.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:13 am to Mr Gardoki
I'm a bit late to the current gen party.
The vids surprised me - is it consensus that this is the smallest cross-gen graphical upgrade ever? In the big picture(compared to something like SNES->PSX or PSX->PS2), I can barely tell the difference.
To clarify, I remember to this day how Mario 64 and Soul Calibur on Dreamcast floored me when I first saw them. Nothing I'm seeing on either new system comes even close.
The vids surprised me - is it consensus that this is the smallest cross-gen graphical upgrade ever? In the big picture(compared to something like SNES->PSX or PSX->PS2), I can barely tell the difference.
To clarify, I remember to this day how Mario 64 and Soul Calibur on Dreamcast floored me when I first saw them. Nothing I'm seeing on either new system comes even close.
This post was edited on 11/3/13 at 9:16 am
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:22 am to Broseph Barksdale
I actually kind of agree. The graphics aren't that much better than the last gen, IMHO. But, this is also the very early stages of development for games on the new consoles which haven't fully taken advantage of their hardware.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:38 am to Broseph Barksdale
360 from Xbox floored me the first time I saw a TW golf comparison.
Basically 360 is XB1 with slightly blurred graphics.
Basically 360 is XB1 with slightly blurred graphics.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:53 am to Roaad
quote:
Basically 360 is XB1 with slightly blurred graphics.
I agree with this. To me, it looks more like the difference between the N64 and PSX (sharper textures) than PSX and PS2.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News