- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 10:32 pm to LSU Coyote
Posted on 10/17/13 at 10:32 pm to LSU Coyote
Physx bro...
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:13 pm to LSU Coyote
The only important consideration is price/performance. It doesn't matter if AMD doesn't have a single GPU solution that performs as well as NVidia's fastest single GPU. It also doesn't matter how old or new they are either, to a reasonable extent. It's simply a matter of determining your budget, knowing the performance you want, and choosing the best value in that range. If, after the fricking cards actually start shipping and we start seeing real performance tests across multiple review sites in numerous games at numerous resolutions with a multitude of overclock tests, it's determined that a $700 GPU on the market outperforms a $1,000 GPU that's also currently on the market, the $700 card clearly demonstrates the better value. It doesn't matter why the $1000 GPU is $1000. If you need more performance than the $700 card offers, you will need to spend more money, regardless of brand.
But, having said that, if the 290x is only a little faster than the 780, and the starting price for a reference model is really going to be $729, then that's a terrible value based on what else is available. The 780 isn't exactly a good value either. I have no loyalty to either brand. In fact, AMD pulls the same sort of gimmicky bullshite as NVidia. AMD just isn't as successful at it. It just happened that, for the past 9 years, every time I was in the market for a GPU upgrade, AMD always offered a better value for the performance I wanted at the time.
Clearly, it's going to be a while before there is anything out there to tempt me to upgrade. As it stands, the market value of my cards, if sold new, is $600. There is no other GPU solution even close to that price range that offers any significant advantage.
But, having said that, if the 290x is only a little faster than the 780, and the starting price for a reference model is really going to be $729, then that's a terrible value based on what else is available. The 780 isn't exactly a good value either. I have no loyalty to either brand. In fact, AMD pulls the same sort of gimmicky bullshite as NVidia. AMD just isn't as successful at it. It just happened that, for the past 9 years, every time I was in the market for a GPU upgrade, AMD always offered a better value for the performance I wanted at the time.
Clearly, it's going to be a while before there is anything out there to tempt me to upgrade. As it stands, the market value of my cards, if sold new, is $600. There is no other GPU solution even close to that price range that offers any significant advantage.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:25 pm to LSU Coyote
You should just give me your 7950...
Posted on 10/18/13 at 1:20 am to bluebarracuda
After about 40 hours I beat gta, I can be a pc gamer again
Posted on 10/18/13 at 8:49 am to Mr Gardoki
Why are dead pixels such a hot issue with 1440p monitors? Is it just because there are more pixels so the odds are up?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 9:59 am to Mr Gardoki
quote:
Why are dead pixels such a hot issue with 1440p monitors? Is it just because there are more pixels so the odds are up?
The reason being is because non warranty or guarantee is involved. You are buying from an unknown Korean source and return cost are the same as investment cost. That on top of the market exists from a rejected batch of LG IPS panels.
I have 4 1440 monitors in 3 different "brands" from 2 different supplies off eBay. The pixel perfect was not purchased and I DO NOT HAVE A SINGLE DEAD PIXEL. I have had more dead pixels on non-Korean 1080 models than those rejected 1440 panels.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:22 am to LSU Coyote
My monitor, mobo from coyote and case should all be in today
Now I'm just waiting on my h320 to ship out
Now I'm just waiting on my h320 to ship out
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:43 am to bluebarracuda
I am about to have some WC gear for sale once I finish the sysprep cycle on the parts.
240mm XSPC slim rad
240mm XSPC thick rad
(using my phone so I need to look up exact model names later)
120mm swiftech mcr-qp
Xspc razor 7970 block
Xspc rasa CPU block
D5 vario pump with xspc dual bay res top
Sunbeam Rheosmart PWM fan controller
240mm XSPC slim rad
240mm XSPC thick rad
(using my phone so I need to look up exact model names later)
120mm swiftech mcr-qp
Xspc razor 7970 block
Xspc rasa CPU block
D5 vario pump with xspc dual bay res top
Sunbeam Rheosmart PWM fan controller
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:41 am to ILikeLSUToo
You're killing me man
With this h320, I Can probably easily expand it to the video card with no need for extras. I'd still probably grab a 120mm so I can have a rad between the CPU and gpu
With this h320, I Can probably easily expand it to the video card with no need for extras. I'd still probably grab a 120mm so I can have a rad between the CPU and gpu
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:47 am to ILikeLSUToo
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:52 am to HobbsTheTiger
That's absolutely stupid cheap. If I had that same card I would buy it instantly to xfire
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:53 am to HobbsTheTiger
7970 is dead next week but you can crossfire it with the r9 280x unless AMD starts being a dick about it. That's a really good price and that card is still fast as hell. frick a 770.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 12:32 pm to HobbsTheTiger
quote:
What do you all think about the 7970 at this price point ($229). I'd like to purchase a single card now, and in a few years consider dual cards. I assume this will be around for a few years?
Definitely the lowest price I've seen for a 7970 that isn't a stripped down cheapo non-reference version that hits 90C while gaming.
But as Bruce said, these cards won't around much longer. They'll be discontinued at the end of the month, and buying them used will quickly become the only way to get one (not that used is a bad thing, though). The R9-280x is essentially a reflashed, overclocked 7970, perhaps on a souped-up PCB for more power draw, max stability at the higher clocks.
You can get a 280x and crossfire it with a 7970 later, but no guarantees how the different bioses with interact. Crossfire is not a set-it-and-forget-it configuration, even though it's getting closer to being that way.
When I'm in the market for a new card, I always buy current gen, but that 7970 price is very tempting. If you're gaming at 1080p, I still might suggest the 280x simply because it will last you long enough that you may even consider selling it for a new single-GPU solution sometime down the road, rather than crossfire. And the 280x might be easier to sell than the 7970, which is already close to 2 years old.
But I dunno. Maybe buy a used 7970 on ebay if you can get one even cheaper than that XFX. By the time you're ready to upgrade, you can either get another dirt cheap 7970 used, or sell your 7970 for dirt cheap and go with something else, like another flagship card that has had some time to be on the market and go down from its initial "OMG-it's-new-gotta-have-it" premium price.
It is baffling that the 290X might actually cost over $700, when spending ~$600-$640 on two 280x's would significantly outperform it, as well as the Titan and 780.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 12:59 pm to ILikeLSUToo
229 for a 7970.. wow. lol
WOW!
EDIT:
Start building your HTPCs with this thing... very tempting.
WOW!
EDIT:
Start building your HTPCs with this thing... very tempting.
This post was edited on 10/18/13 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 10/18/13 at 1:21 pm to LSU Coyote
Nvidia announces 780ti
Nvidia also announces new Gsync in monitors.
The article on Gsync fell in love with the demo they saw and used the phrase game changer. It's a very interesting concept.
Nvidia also announces new Gsync in monitors.
The article on Gsync fell in love with the demo they saw and used the phrase game changer. It's a very interesting concept.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 1:36 pm to Mr Gardoki
quote:
Nvidia announces 780ti
That is just dumb..
If it is a GK110-325 and between a GK110-300 and 400.. how stupid, the 290X will still out perform it. Unless it is for the 290?
WHAT I DO HOPE IT IS.. A TITAN's GK110-400 with JUST 3GB of memory instead of 6GB! Bringing the price to around $750!.
I would sell my 2 Titans and buy 3 780Ti if it is a GK110-400 3GB card for $750
EDT:
quote:
This new GeForce card will arrive mid-November. Reviewers will get their samples today so we should learn a lot more in few next hours.
According to TechPowerUP, GTX 780 Ti should replace the GTX 780 at the current pricepoint, meaning GTX 780 should get cheaper now.
Okay.. So $649!!!!!!!!!
Excited to see what chip this thing has inside.
This post was edited on 10/18/13 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 10/18/13 at 1:38 pm to LSU Coyote
I'm not so interested in the 780ti since it is way out of my price range but that gsync is going to be interesting to watch.
eta: also along the lines of batman. Steam has them all 75% off this weekend plus GFWL has been removed from all of them. There is a way on their forums to transfer save games but I'm not really attached to mine.
eta: also along the lines of batman. Steam has them all 75% off this weekend plus GFWL has been removed from all of them. There is a way on their forums to transfer save games but I'm not really attached to mine.
This post was edited on 10/18/13 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 10/18/13 at 1:50 pm to Mr Gardoki
What is really disgusting are 2 things.
1) nVidia holding back technology because no competition
2) nVidia setting extreme price points because no competion
3) AMD being on consoles and having most developers code directly for their 2nd Tier GCN chips
4) Even with consoles on x86 based systems we still wont have the full potential of the BEST cards because developers are going to code for GCN /OpenCL to shine over CUDA
Yes I love the competition and we need it. We need both nVidia and AMD to fight it out every release. The thing I am getting at is AMD makes the 2nd Tier hardware compared to Intel and nVidia. The problem is now we get AMD's 2nd tier hardware performing along the same lines as Intel/nVidia just because games will be coded directly for GCN.
Guess we will need to wait another 4-5yrs to see the all developers code for directly for the best hardware.
Again call me fan boy #1 but just step back and think about it.
nVidia had the GK110 2yrs ago, ready for launch... 2 fckking yrs ago. The "Titan" core was suppose to launch against the Tahiti chip. Instead the US Government purchased like 80,000 GK110-400 chips for their supercomputer in Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This then forced nVidia to send out a CUT DOWN Kepler chip in the form of GK104-400-A2 which is the 680.
So you guys see my point?
CPUs = INTEL >>> AMD
GPUs = nVIdia >>> AMD
AMD has a terrible business model and will always be the 2nd tier company.. that is WHERE they want to be.
Repeating myself again... just frustrating we can't have the best code for the best hardware.
1) nVidia holding back technology because no competition
2) nVidia setting extreme price points because no competion
3) AMD being on consoles and having most developers code directly for their 2nd Tier GCN chips
4) Even with consoles on x86 based systems we still wont have the full potential of the BEST cards because developers are going to code for GCN /OpenCL to shine over CUDA
Yes I love the competition and we need it. We need both nVidia and AMD to fight it out every release. The thing I am getting at is AMD makes the 2nd Tier hardware compared to Intel and nVidia. The problem is now we get AMD's 2nd tier hardware performing along the same lines as Intel/nVidia just because games will be coded directly for GCN.
Guess we will need to wait another 4-5yrs to see the all developers code for directly for the best hardware.
Again call me fan boy #1 but just step back and think about it.
nVidia had the GK110 2yrs ago, ready for launch... 2 fckking yrs ago. The "Titan" core was suppose to launch against the Tahiti chip. Instead the US Government purchased like 80,000 GK110-400 chips for their supercomputer in Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This then forced nVidia to send out a CUT DOWN Kepler chip in the form of GK104-400-A2 which is the 680.
So you guys see my point?
CPUs = INTEL >>> AMD
GPUs = nVIdia >>> AMD
AMD has a terrible business model and will always be the 2nd tier company.. that is WHERE they want to be.
Repeating myself again... just frustrating we can't have the best code for the best hardware.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:03 pm to LSU Coyote
Don't hold back. Tell us how you really feel!
This post was edited on 10/18/13 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:03 pm to LSU Coyote
If not raw, observable performance, what, in your opinion, defines "best" hardware?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News