Started By
Message

re: Worst Quarterback to Win a Super Bowl?

Posted on 1/28/13 at 2:31 pm to
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33704 posts
Posted on 1/28/13 at 2:31 pm to
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141660 posts
Posted on 1/28/13 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

None of that makes him more than an above average QB. His 1966-68 seasons were great, but everything else hovered around average.


That's the whole point

Namath was great for a few seasons -- all I've ever said

Is the psychopathic hatred for Namath on here b/c he went to Alabama?

Or jelly b/c he got so much pussy?
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66890 posts
Posted on 1/28/13 at 8:31 pm to
:inb4aikman
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 1/28/13 at 10:00 pm to
Using stats to compare QBs across eras is horrible.

Something like 14 of the top 20 QB ratings are from QBs who played after 1992.

But Namath doesn't really have great stats for his own era. Even his SB III MVP - completed 17 of 28 passes for 206 yards - seem pretty pedestrian.

Regardless, the people who saw him play say he was great before he became hobbled. Al Davis said when he threw the ball, it was like he was playing downhill.
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 1/28/13 at 10:31 pm to
Dilfer
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64954 posts
Posted on 1/28/13 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

Regardless, the people who saw him play say he was great before he became hobbled. Al Davis said when he threw the ball, it was like he was playing downhill.


And I'll take their word for it. Hell…even after he became hobbled the guy could still throw the ball. In '72 he and Johnny Unitas got into a passing duel when the Jets traveled to play the Colts. They both combined for nearly 900 passing yards with Namath throwing for 496 and 6 touchdowns.
Posted by RedMustang
Member since Oct 2011
6851 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 12:21 am to
Doug Williams, Mark Rypien?
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33922 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 12:32 am to
Namath might be overrated but he's not anywhere near the worst QB to win a Super Bowl. Dilfer has got to be at the bottom of the list. Brad Johnson, Jeff Hostetler, Doug Williams, and Mark Rypien all had very solid performances in the Super Bowl. Dilfer was 12-25 for 153 yards against the Giants in Super Bowl 35. He was mediocre in the Super Bowl, playoffs and regular season and he did nothing of note after winning the Super Bowl even though he was only 28 years old and in the prime of his career when he won it. Dilfer is easily the worst starting QB to win a Super Bowl.
This post was edited on 1/29/13 at 12:34 am
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11906 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 4:57 am to
If it was worst performance, Rapelisburger would have to be high on that list.

If it's just about the actual position, I think it would have to be douche Dilfer.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram