- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I am a right-wing guy and I am on board with a gun ban
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:37 pm to asurob1
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:37 pm to asurob1
quote:
I wonder what it's like to sit around and be so paranoid.
coming from the guy who keeps saying, "Bury the dead and move on is the motto of the USA."
pot, meet kettle
1
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:37 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
You do not want to go down this road
Too late.
I did...and I await your further insults.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:37 pm to asurob1
I have a feeling if these poliboard warriors were in the crowd last night they would be thinking about things differently.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:38 pm to AUstar
So you're emotional and reactionary.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
and what about the press and new tech there?
Just because you don't understand how to get your message out to the masses doesn't mean you can't learn how.
Hell all you have to do is look at some of the instagram queens...
Seems like you're not trying very hard.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:38 pm to asurob1
You are worse than BamaSJW. At least he still fights for his liberal beliefs. Step up, man.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:38 pm to asurob1
quote:
The intent of the constitution was written back when guns could only fire one round ball at a time and it took a good light infantry man 30 seconds to reload.
No. The intent of the constitution (specifically the 2nd amendment) was to keep a check on a tyrannical government.
And before so say something stupid like "civilians could never defeat the military" I'll go ahead and say bullshite. 150,000,000 civilians own 350,000,000 firearms in America. If it came down to a fight the military would not have an easy row to hoe. Consider how bogged down they have been in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:39 pm to Rakim
quote:
I have a feeling if these poliboard warriors were in the crowd last night they would be thinking about things differently.
you should never justify policy, especially increasing government, based on emotional thinking
bad "logic" there
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:39 pm to AUstar
quote:
I am fine with handguns and people carrying handguns.
For every murder committed with a rifle, dozens (if not hundreds) are committed with a pistol.
Your thread is bad and you should be ashamed.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
coming from the guy who keeps saying, "Bury the dead and move on is the motto of the USA."
Where's the paranoia in that statement.
It's reality.
It's exactly what we will be doing for the next week or so.
And then the story will fade into the background while we argue about walls and tax cuts.
At least until the next one...which will happen.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:40 pm to Rakim
quote:
I have a feeling if these poliboard warriors were in the crowd last night they would be thinking about things differently.
Doubt it. I'm already firmly against "gun-free zones."
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
also, just as a reminder, we have banned assault rifles adn the AWB didn't do shite
I mentioned that in my OP. The Clinton ban had no teeth because it was mostly about cosmetics and "pats on the back" for the Democrats. They didn't go far enough, quite frankly.
The Clinton ban said that a gun is an assault rifle if it had the following features:
1) A flash suppressor
2) A magazine of more than 10 rounds
3) A bayonet lug
4) Pistol grips
The ban made it illegal to manufacture (new) rifles with all of these features. However, you could have 2 of the 4 features. So what happened? Colt and Armalite and others simply sold their guns without a bayonet lug and a flash suppressor. This meant you still had pistol grips and a 30 round mag, if you wanted. And the ban said nothing about guns manufactured prior to (1994 I think it was). You could still buy those with no issue, even though the price did jump on them.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:41 pm to Rakim
quote:
I have a feeling if these poliboard warriors were in the crowd last night they would be thinking about things differently.
I believe most of them would have been doing exactly as Dan BLizeran did...it's always easier to be the toughest cat in the room until someone starts spraying the room with rounds.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:41 pm to Rakim
quote:
Dumb
I'm not in favor of confiscating weapons. Stop the lying.
Oh, that's right. You're just in favor of moving forward - whatever the frick that means.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:41 pm to roadGator
quote:
You are worse than BamaSJW. At least he still fights for his liberal beliefs. Step up, man.
Gun control is not one of my beliefs.
I recognize that will never happen in my lifetime.
But I guarantee we will have more mass shootings in my lifetime.
Many more.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:42 pm to Rakim
quote:
sale of military style weapons
Why are you worried about military style weapons when there are hundreds and thousands of needless deaths due to race/drag/performance style vehicles?
No one needs a car that can exceed 25 mph. No one needs a dodge viper. Or Ford mustangs. Or any of them. They are useless metal death traps and you can get from point a to point b in a plethora of other, more safe and environmentally friendly ways.
Just think of all the lives you will save. All the children who will live a long and happy life.
If you aren't for common sense vehicle control then you are a monster and hate children.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:42 pm to AUstar
Take a hike fella
We are protected by the Second Amendment
We are protected by the Second Amendment
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:42 pm to asurob1
quote:
Again...the intent of the amendment was from back when we shot round balls that almost never hit the target ;-).
So this is the only protected free speech then?
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:43 pm to AUstar
America needs some sort of gun control. The founding fathers didn't intend for civilians to have automatic/semi auto weapons. Seriously in what world do we need weapons like these? If your only answer is that they're fun to shoot, then you should feel really bad. It may not be the perfect fix, but it will be a step in the right direction. These weapons should be for war only, it's really pretty simple. We have at least got to try, I mean it's just insane to sit here and do nothing.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News