Started By
Message

re: Blue chip ratio

Posted on 8/22/17 at 7:49 pm to
Posted by slayerxing
Gainesville
Member since Feb 2010
11045 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 7:49 pm to
It's a much more balanced roster with better skill players no doubt.
Posted by gatordmb89
Member since Dec 2009
30461 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:26 pm to
I'm a bit worried at the lack of star power on the defense, but I'll give it this class at least.
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
22953 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 10:31 pm to
This has been my big sticking point on Mac. I think he develops players well. He spots diamonds in the rough. However; you win with blue chips. That is just a fact. Every national title winner since as far back as 24/7 goes, has won with a high blue chip number. It's just what it is. End of the day. The more blue chips, the more talented. Ratings are based on their athletic ability more than anything. Five stars are generally freaks of nature players. Must haves. Sure, some will fail with poor attitude or coaching. But Spikes, Harvin, Tebow, Hargreaves, Bullard, Harvey, etc...our list of incredible five stars should convince everyone these are a must on a great team.

We can develop lesser talent to an extent. We need more blue chips. Being under 40 percent is the worst Florida has been since Spurrier started bringing in his classes. That is an issue. A major one. Luckily, he is doing very well this class. We need a few stud defenders though.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter