Started By
Message

re: President Trump on wind-generated electricity

Posted on 6/23/17 at 7:38 am to
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18076 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 7:38 am to
He is right about the birds. He is also right about the volatility of wind power. Iowa's grid is in constant flux due to wind not being consistent.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67506 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 7:41 am to
quote:

wind-generated electricity by GeorgeWest

shite the Dems alone create enough fricking wind to power the western hemisphere
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 7:45 am to
quote:

the environmentalists never talk about that."

That's because many aren't true environmentalist. They're communist who altered their moniker in the 70's to push their agenda via a cause (clean environment) they knew no one could openly oppose.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 7:45 am to
quote:

as if the trumps actually give a shite about animals



How are those pics indicative of whether the Trump's care about animals or not?
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18076 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 7:45 am to
quote:

The OP is misrepresenting what Trump said. He said it in the context of wanting to diversify America's energy, including wind.

But he doesn't want to rely on any one sector of energy too much.


Correct. Trump even went on to say wind is a good choice in the right situation.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18076 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 7:47 am to
quote:

fully implemented alternative energy source that has already demonstrated that it can satisfy the full energy demands of large communities in a cost effective manner?


As an engineer in the renewable industry (utility level), that is completely false.
Posted by BuckeyesAndBulldogs
Athens, Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
3235 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Melt a little harder. Wind turbines kill birds


It's not that I don't believe the birds are dying, I just don't believe humans have much effect on it. Birds have been dying for as long as they've existed.
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24922 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 8:17 am to
Solar farms kill birds, butterflies, etc. Thought dims loved the planet?

LINK

A new report by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service finds that solar facilities in California are acting like “mega traps” that kill and injure birds. As a result, “entire food chains” are being disrupted.

USFWS’s National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory studied three solar farms in Southern California: Desert Sunlight, Genesis Solar and Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS). Two-hundred and thirty-three different birds from 71 species were found over the course of a two-year study.

The three main causes of death were:

1. Solar flux: Exposure to temperatures over 800 degrees F.

2. Impact (or blunt force) trauma: The birds’ wings are rendered inoperable while flying, causing them to crash into the ground. Birds that do not die are often injured badly enough to make them vulnerable to predators.

3. Predators: When a bird’s wings are singed and it can not fly, it loses its primary means of defense against animals like foxes and coyotes.

Hummingbirds, swifts, swallows, doves, hawks, finches, warblers and owls were just some dead birds found at the solar facilities’ “equal opportunity” mortality hazards.
In one instance, lab staff observed a “falcon-type bird with a plume of smoke arising from the tail as it passed through [a] flux field.”

The study found that besides the intense heat, birds may be mistaking large solar panels for bodies of water. The injured birds then attract insects and other predators to the area. They, too, are then vulnerable to injury or death.

In one instance, researchers found “hundreds upon hundreds” of butterfly carcasses (including Monarchs). The insects were attracted to the light from the solar farms, which in turn attracted birds and perpetuated a cycle of death and injury.

One of the recommendations of the study, which stated that the number of deaths was likely underrepresented, was to retrofit solar panels to discourage birds and insects from congregating in the area.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Birds have been dying for as long as they've existed


Just like the climate has been changing for as long as it's existed.
Posted by BuckeyesAndBulldogs
Athens, Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
3235 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Just like the climate has been changing for as long as it's existed


Glad you've been able to pick up on sarcasm. Congrats champ.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26666 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:10 am to
I thought you guys liked hyperbole. You sure ate it up when Jug Ears was in the White House.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43394 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:30 am to
quote:

So, conservatives are for a fully developed and fully implemented alternative energy source that has already demonstrated that it can satisfy the full energy demands of large communities in a cost effective manner?


I'm assuming you mean nuclear here. Because surely you wouldn't be so stupid as to claim solar or wind falls under this....

Right?
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
59086 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Because surely you wouldn't be so stupid as to claim solar or wind falls under this....

Right?



I'd be careful with casting aspersions of stupidity if I were you. The intent of my statement obviously flew over your head.
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23651 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:35 am to
quote:

They're a fricking eyesore, I know that much.


Have a client looking for some land on the island of Hawaii. I'm amazed at how many beautiful places have an ugly arse wind turbine on them.

Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43394 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:39 am to
quote:

The intent of my statement obviously flew over your head.


Nah. Your intent is just stupid. The transition to electrical lighting didn't require massive tax subsidies and forced government regulation.

The point YOU seemed to miss was that the transition to renewables should only happen when it's economically viable to do so. Wind will never be economically viable on a large scale, and I have serious doubts solar ever will.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
59086 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:46 am to
quote:

The transition to electrical lighting didn't require massive tax subsidies and forced government regulation.



Yes, our tax code is certainly more intricate in the 21st century than in the 19th century. Any more brilliant observations, Einstein? No forced government regulation in the transition to electricity? The paucity of intelligent thought in that statement is laughable.


quote:

Wind will never be economically viable on a large scale, and I have serious doubts solar ever will.


Do you have the winning lottery numbers too?

It's amazing that there are a lot of intelligent people working in the alternative energy sector (I even work with some), but Centinel on Tigerdroppings already has all the answers.


Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 10:02 am to
He was more referencing the symbol of our Nation being killed off in large number by the wind turbines I believe. Aren't most of you lefty twinks all in your "feelings"? I expect better from you.

#eaglelivesmatter

quote:

Bald and golden eagles may be legally killed or injured in the thousands by high-speed turbines (reaching speeds up to 170 miles per hour), under new regulations released Wednesday by the Obama administration. The rules, which affect individual wind-energy companies that plan to operate the technology for up to 30 years, allows up to 4,200 of the birds to perish


LINK
Posted by Dirty Whistle
Member since Jul 2011
1159 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 10:55 am to



Save the birds?
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 12:45 am to
Fully agree with your point that conservatives should support the renewable energy industry, but it should be done without government subsidy for either industry. The global market for renewable energy will no doubt be larger than the coal industry in the years to come. American workers will be better off if we go ahead and develop that industry in the states instead of letting other countries take the lead.
Posted by Bullethead88
Half way between LSU and Tulane
Member since Dec 2009
4202 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:43 am to
quote:

And serial killers don't have a real impact on human populations..

You should probably send that one back through and see if a better analogy comes back.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram