Started By
Message

re: CITIZENS Had to THROW CHAIRS at Terrorists Because UNARMED POLICE RAN AWAY

Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:13 am to
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:13 am to
Are you going to delete/edit this completely bullshite OP?
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76709 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Are you going to delete/edit this completely bullshite OP?
what's bullshite about it?
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:22 am to
quote:

what's bullshite about it?


The unarmed police running away.
Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:27 am to
LOL MasterofTigerBait dr
Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:53 am to
As soon as you agree that your profile is BS and delete it
Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 11:54 am to
So the Guardian didn't interview the people that stated that and are now a part of the conservative movement in London?
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20525 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Reading is hard. Police shot the dudes within 8 minutes of receiving their first call.

You make that sound fine and simple, but there are a couple of points to consider.

First off, there ARE statements that unarmed "bobbies" were there, and ran away. We don't know if this occurred before, during, or after the "chair throwing", but the fact remains- if these officers had sidearms, the effective police intervention would have been faster than 8 minutes, and possibly saved some lives. I don't think anyone can dispute that.

Second point, and something EVERYONE should take a moment to consider: I just took a quick look at my iPod, and 8 minutes is approximately the amount of time it takes for 2 songs to play completely. So, go pop some headphones on, and mull that concept over, while you listen to some music....
there apparently were "police" on hand at the time this started, but due to outdated traditions, they were useless. so go ahead and play your 2 songs, and imagine that you have 3 people attacking a crowd (maybe YOU) with knives, that entire time, before more police actually armed and capable of dealing with the event show up.

For perspective, most action scenes in a movie don't last even the length of 1 song.

That is a LONG TIME to have to fend for yourself, when you consider if the original bobbies simply had a handgun, this could have been avoided.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141092 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:05 pm to
If this board sucks then maybe du is more your speed.
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

The police were running away, they were community police. They were normal officers, they were running away.


Why on God's earth would you have unarmed police in position to do something to stop this? Understand, it was a raised threat level country!

fricking dumb arse liberal thinking!
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

The British Police I know say you're wrong.


Ok.

Just relaying the info.

I got a hand full of friends that work for the police over there.

After the last attack we had this talk and they still preferred to be unarmed.

In their minds, being unarmed helps them be better accepted by the community they are policing. They think that is why police in America is so disrespected but they also agree that police in America has to be armed.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141092 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:20 pm to
Unarmed police should be armed with late 1970s steel baseball bats. Squash a few terrorist pumpkins in the street and see if it is worth it for these darlings of progressives.

This post was edited on 6/4/17 at 12:22 pm
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58981 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

The equivalent of mall security.

Reading is hard. Police shot the dudes within 8 minutes of receiving their first call.


Take your own advice! Can you not read? Here is the direct quote from the article!

The police were running away, they were community police. They were normal officers, they were running away.

Note: They were normal officers. If they were equivalent to mall security it is only because they were unarmed.

Am I misunderstanding something? By saying they were normal officers, aren't they saying they were regular police officers?

quote:

Police shot the dudes within 8 minutes of receiving their first call.

If the officers that were on hand were armed, I wonder how long it would have taken them to shoot the terrorists?
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

The unarmed police running away.



hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Guardian

left wing as shite

hahahahahahahahahahahaha

What the frick do you know about it anyway sitting on your arse wherever the Hell you are?

Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58981 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

They were dead in 8 mins



But... but... liberals are dumb!!!


But....but....but....how many died or were injured?

You are truly amazing.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

re you going to delete/edit this completely bullshite OP


Why would she delete the truth?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127054 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Reading is hard. Police shot the dudes within 8 minutes of receiving their first call.

When the difference between life and death is a matter of seconds, "within minutes" may as well be hours......
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

So the Guardian didn't interview the people that stated that and are now a part of the conservative movement in London?


Eyewitness reports immediately after an event are often wrong. And the last part is a LOL.

Many of the wounded are unarmed police officers who were wounded attempting to take down the attackers. The BTO and Met have already put out statements about this.

And what do you mean about my profile?

ETA:

I also love how you will post FAKE NEWS!!!! to anything that disagrees with you, but will take absolutely any line of a news story that fits your narrative as the inerrant word of God.
This post was edited on 6/4/17 at 1:22 pm
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Note: They were normal officers. If they were equivalent to mall security it is only because they were unarmed.


There is actually a difference between a PCSO (community police - basically, the people who would be out stopping drunks) and a normal officer. The statement isn't clear on what the person saw.
This post was edited on 6/4/17 at 1:08 pm
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63698 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 1:51 pm to
Gateway Pundit Is Laughable as a source for anything other than dark humor.
Posted by thingshavechanged
Member since May 2017
413 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 1:54 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram