- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I try to be party unbiased
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:15 pm to KaiserSoze99
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:15 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
It makes not goddamn motherfricking, cocksucking sense to take money from citizens of Texas, send it to washington d.c., only to have that same money return to Texas with conditions on it. I believe in the free market of State ideas and action.
Yeah well TX, Cali, NY could survive in a free market. Louisiana and most of the southeastern states couldn't. They are completely dependent on federal money.
2
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:15 pm to fareplay
quote:California?
AND GUESS WHICH STATE SPENDS THE MOST ON SOCIAL POLICIES
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:15 pm to fareplay
You don't have any reasoning
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:17 pm to fareplay
quote:
less funding causes lower quality of education.
We have a wealth of evidence that suggests minimal correlation between amount of spending and quality of education.
The most obvious factor is the type of students and the support they get from home. In poor areas, it is nearly nonexistent and even ridiculed as socially unacceptable. In richer areas, students and parents understand the importance of education and most have long-term goals.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:17 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
You don't have any reasoning
Has a shite ton of emotion in there though.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:18 pm to fareplay
quote:School vouchers help students from poor families to attend private schools that they would not be able to attend otherwise.
She will create a further gap of education between rich and the poor.
Your reasoning is flawed.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:18 pm to LSURussian
quote:
WHICH STATE SPENDS THE MOST ON SOCIAL POLICIES
That's state monies. Not federal.
Which states need the most federal subsidies?
LA and MS
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:19 pm to LSURussian
quote:
She will create a further gap of education between rich and the poor.
School vouchers help students from poor families to attend private schools that they would not be able to attend otherwise.
Your reasoning is flawed.
my guess is a teacher.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:19 pm to LSURussian
read the full post
Poor rural area students are those shafted the most.
Poor rural area students are those shafted the most.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:19 pm to CptBengal
I am not a teacher, I am actually an economist.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:19 pm to MSMHater
quote:
Opposition to most of the cabinet nominees has been out of spite and in the name of politics.
Can't really blame. The Dem base has been screaming for them to grow a backbone and become the party of "No" like they feel the Republicans were the past 8 years. Doing it for so many cabinet picks is certainly unprecedented, but I do think they had legitimate concerns on a few of them. DeVos, Pruitt, Mnuchin, and Sessions mainly. The rest just seemed like half-hearted opposition.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:19 pm to FanInLA
quote:
Yeah well TX, Cali, NY could survive in a free market. Louisiana and most of the southeastern states couldn't. They are completely dependent on federal money.
Well, then, they can't afford free education to everyone. It's unsustainable.
If they weren't sending so much money to D.C. maybe they could get their shite together. Or, let the free market ease some of the burden.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:20 pm to fareplay
quote:You suck at economics. You must work for a government agency.
I am actually an economist.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:21 pm to KaiserSoze99
What DC does is use logic to send money out to areas that need it the most. Property tax in CA shaft CA schools, which require funding. Other areas (For example, Port Lavaca Tx which is my home town) get shafted because 90% of the population make less than poverty so we need federal funding.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:23 pm to FanInLA
What exactly is bad about what Davos wants to do?
Allow school choice and return control and money to the local level?
Is there something else?
No matter the school, a child's success is primarily determined by having parents that give a shite. I know personal responsibility is a four letter word often for the left though. Wouldn't school choice help the poor parents who actually care help them get to a better school?
Allow school choice and return control and money to the local level?
Is there something else?
No matter the school, a child's success is primarily determined by having parents that give a shite. I know personal responsibility is a four letter word often for the left though. Wouldn't school choice help the poor parents who actually care help them get to a better school?
This post was edited on 2/7/17 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:25 pm to fareplay
So you are arguing for the status quo, while pointing out vast areas of the country that are failing under the status quo?
Makes sense.
Makes sense.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:26 pm to nes2010
One topic is on the OT and other on a real board.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:27 pm to fareplay
quote:
Poor rural area students are those shafted the most.
They're not trying hard enough. That said..what comprizes this "shafting" you refer to?
Posted on 2/7/17 at 12:27 pm to nes2010
quote:
You are an economist and yet yesterday you started a thread asking if it's illegal to buy stolen rims and saying that buying stolen goods is a way to get ahead?
the ShariaBlue waffles posters arent even halfway intelligent.
The Progs..the party of stupidity.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News