Started By
Message

re: Wedding Planning - UPDATED

Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:34 pm to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84376 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

but it's not your job to document the party. We hired someone for that





This may be the most bridezilla sounding thing I've read in a wedding thread on TD.
Posted by bmela12
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
313 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Pictures of you and your date or some friends is fine but it's not your job to document the party. We hired someone for that


This!
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
26673 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:39 pm to


This is the kind of shite that can easily be avoided if you just ask people to not take photos during the ceremony.

Again, 15 minute ceremony. After that, take photos until you're out of memory for all I care.
Posted by bmela12
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
313 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:40 pm to
This has been a very interesting rabbit hole we've gone down. Started as caterers, venues, and wedding booze...touched on feelings, cell phones, and kids.

What shall we talk about next? Religion? Politics?

Seriously though, all good stuff and will help me and what seems like a few others figure out this wedding stuff. I've been involved in so many, I got cocky and thought I could figure this out. All good stuff I'm getting here today.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84376 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:40 pm to
That's a shitty photographer. Don't hire one of those.
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
26673 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:41 pm to
Thank you for completely ignoring the point.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84376 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:43 pm to
No flash should be more powerful than the one the photographer is using. There are way too many things wrong with that pic for any legit photographer to put their name on.

That looks like it was taken by someone that bought a Nikon 3300 on black friday and decided they were a "photographer."
Posted by burgeman
Member since Jun 2008
10368 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

booze for ~$20 per person.


If you are in SE Louisiana you can get The Crescent Bar in Hammond to cater the booze. They charge by how much alcohol you consume, not by head. When we did it we invited 200-250 people to our wedding, the final bill from The Crescent was under $1k. The owner is very accommodating and willing to fill requests for whatever you want.

When we sat down to put a deposit down he went over everything and said expect to be around $5/head for well stuff, $7/head for the mid tier liquor/beer and around $9/head for "top shelf".
Posted by bmela12
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
313 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

If you are in SE Louisiana you can get The Crescent Bar in Hammond to cater the booze. They charge by how much alcohol you consume, not by head. When we did it we invited 200-250 people to our wedding, the final bill from The Crescent was under $1k. The owner is very accommodating and willing to fill requests for whatever you want.

When we sat down to put a deposit down he went over everything and said expect to be around $5/head for well stuff, $7/head for the mid tier liquor/beer and around $9/head for "top shelf"


This is great information! Did the ~$1k include a bartender(s) also?
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
26673 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:47 pm to
Ok, I'm really not arguing the quality of the photo. I agree with you that it's generally a bad picture. I just pulled a random one off google.

But let's say it was a perfectly fine photo, but for the two people who are clearly holding cell phones up right at the aisle.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36744 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:48 pm to
quote:



This may be the most bridezilla sounding thing I've read in a wedding thread on TD.


I think it's just a respect thing. We all seen that aunt that's in the way of the bar or dance floor

It's less a bridezilla and more a modern Seinfeld

no one is going actively police it but just get out of the women just snapping pics of every flower
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84376 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

But let's say it was a perfectly fine photo, but for the two people who are clearly holding cell phones up right at the aisle.




I wouldn't consider the picture ruined. Neither would my wife.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84376 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

We all seen that aunt that's in the way of the bar or dance floor


I haven't. You sound like a control freak honestly.
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
26673 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't consider the picture ruined. Neither would my wife.


There we go, at least we're arguing about the same thing now.

And if you and your wife don't mind, great. More power to you. Just like if y'all didn't mind having kids there. It's your wedding, it's your prerogative. I (and my fiance) just feel differently.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84376 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:57 pm to
I promise I'm not trying to change your mind. My SIL is getting married in May and is doing the no kids thing, even though it's all the same kids we had at ours.

Everyone can do things there way. Like you said, it's your party.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38982 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 2:59 pm to
I've looked at my wedding photos exactly zero times
we did do the no kids thing though
thinned the herd considerably and everyone had a great time
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36744 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

I haven't. You sound like a control freak honestly.


It's more that I just hate taking photos endlessly especially the first hour or so when it's a rush to the bar/food. Just be out of the way, people want to eat/drink not take a photo for your facebook. Once people are lubed up its and flowing it's not an issue because it thins out a bit. Go nuts at that point.

Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
26673 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 3:09 pm to


To the OP: also consider taking your wedding photos BEFORE the ceremony.

I know it ruins the whole "groom seeing the bride in the dress for the first time at the ceremony" thing, but you and the rest of the wedding party can go straight from the wedding to enjoying yourselves at the reception that you paid a fortune for.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84376 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

To the OP: also consider taking your wedding photos BEFORE the ceremony.

I know it ruins the whole "groom seeing the bride in the dress for the first time at the ceremony" thing, but you and the rest of the wedding party can go straight from the wedding to enjoying yourselves at the reception that you paid a fortune for.




Oh come on

Full disclosure, my reception venue didn't start the "timer" until we had arrived. But our after ceremony pics took like 10 minutes tops. This is partly where a good photographer earns their money IMO.
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
26673 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 3:17 pm to
Somehow I knew you'd have a bone to pick with that comment, LNCH, just like you tend to do with most things I post.

I'm just advocating to get the "business" portion of the evening done early so you can enjoy yourself. I know people who have done it and were glad they did, and people who didn't do it and wished they had. I also know people who didn't do it and didn't mind. Just food for thought for the OP.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram