Started By
Message

re: "Get out of my house with all that gay." man gets 40 years in prison

Posted on 8/25/16 at 9:52 am to
Posted by DawgGONIT
Member since May 2015
2961 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 9:52 am to
quote:

What do you propose that the lawyer should have done?
Probably whatever the lawyer did to get that white boy off easy for raping two girls when unconscious, not to mention he was underage and drunk.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76562 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:05 am to
quote:


The defense didn't call any witnesses and didn't present any evidence.


Well done!!!

What evidence and witnesses would you have presented?
Posted by BayouFann
CenLa
Member since Jun 2012
6870 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:10 am to
quote:

. A hate crime is just a crime to me.

I want to agree but there is zero defense for hate crimes cause they're mostly unsolicited or provoked. Just one race, gender or nationality hating another for no gains.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89621 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:16 am to
Hate crime legislation is stupid. It doesn't matter why he poured boiling water on them. The crime is the crime. Beyond mens rea we shouldn't inquire to the other recesses of thought, because we should have the right to entertain hateful thoughts.

Otherwise, we're not free at all.
Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:17 am to
quote:

there is zero defense for hate crimes cause they're mostly unsolicited or provoked


But where in any other case is a motive remotely considered part of the severity of the crime?

If I shoot you, I go to jail for murder. If I shot you because you slept with my wife, if I shot you because I didn't like the way you looked at me, or if I shot you for the 5 bucks in your pocket..... no difference. You can use the motive to convict, no argument there. I'm just stating that for some reason, there is an additional severity added to crimes because of why they were done in these very select cases. There should be a stigma against the person (this guy is obviously a whack job who hates gays and should be remembered as such). I just don't think that is any cause to create a separate offense specifically for the crime.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89621 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:18 am to
quote:

You can use the motive to convict, no argument there.


Right - if you can prove that I'm a hateful person towards certain groups and you want to pile that on as evidence I did it - I'm okay with that, with the caveat that I can present evidence that I hate lots of folks but don't do anything to them.

I'm talking for enhanced sentencing - hate crime legislation in that context seems woefully at odds with the First Amendment and natural rights.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
24995 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:24 am to
quote:

I don't know much about this story, so I'm picturing guys with burns covering their body. Not just a small splash or anything.


quote:

Tolbert must now wear compression garments 23 hours a day for the next two years, Gray wrote in an email to The Post, and is attending weekly counseling and physical therapy sessions to deal with his emotional and physical scars. It’s difficult for him to go outside because sunlight exacerbates the pain of his burns.

Gooden, who was burned even more severely, was in a medically induced coma for several weeks, Gray said. According to his GoFundMe page, more than 60 percent of his body was burned, and he had to undergo skin graft surgery to repair damage to his face, neck, back, arms, chest and head.


Quote from the convicted:

quote:

“They were stuck together like two hot dogs … so I poured a little hot water on them and helped them out,”


Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Hate crime legislation is stupid. It doesn't matter why he poured boiling water on them. The crime is the crime. Beyond mens rea we shouldn't inquire to the other recesses of thought, because we should have the right to entertain hateful thoughts.

Otherwise, we're not free at all.


Georgia doesn't have hate crime legislation.
Posted by BuckeyeFan87
Columbus
Member since Dec 2007
25240 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:26 am to
Sounds like a terrible person. I'm sure he's holding his bible tight, assuming he's in good with the lord though.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:28 am to
People use mens rea as an element in determining sentencing all the time. That is why you have degrees of murder. Even within one category, has no one ever seen or heard of someone getting a lighter sentence for stealing necessities rather than luxury goods?

I disagree with hate crime statutes exactly for the reason that existing punishment ranges already give a method to cover differences in mental states and intent in committing crime.
This post was edited on 8/25/16 at 10:29 am
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17537 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:28 am to
Germans
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
54014 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:47 am to
quote:

So people hate 99% of the population?


Not me. I hate 100%.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83953 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:51 am to
Sick frick.
Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

People use mens rea as an element in determining sentencing all the time. That is why you have degrees of murder. Even within one category, has no one ever seen or heard of someone getting a lighter sentence for stealing necessities rather than luxury goods?


It's one thing to determine the severity of the sentence (which is still borderline), it's another to define it as a different crime. A different crime that can have it's own separate minimum sentence if so chosen. To consider it a hate crime is completely different than just as a crime, then sentencing them differently because of the surrounding circumstance.

And degree of murder is not the same. That has nothing to do with the motive. It more has to do with the circumstances that lead to it. Me shooting you because we got into a random fight over a girl in the bar is a different degree of murder compared to me shooting you 2 days later because we got in a random fight over a girl in a bar. Same motive though.
Posted by RockAndRollDetective
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2014
4506 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 12:37 pm to
This guy at some point will hear the words "Get in my cell with all this gay!"
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11368 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 12:48 pm to
Wow.
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10573 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 2:54 pm to
quote:



I'm not sure that there was much of a defense that she could have mounted for a guy who took the time to boil water.



The guy wasn't going to escape conviction, obviously, but he could have framed a defense to lower the sentence. I probably would have started with his upbringing and moved from there.
This post was edited on 8/25/16 at 2:55 pm
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56470 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

You're forgetting there are two victims. 2 convictions of murder will not get you less than 40 years I believe.
It's also premeditated. He got a pot, filled it with water, brought it to a boil and poured it onto two people. He had plenty of time to think about what he was doing.

Still, he had no desire to kill them, so a better lawyer should have been able to get him less time. I'm glad this did not happen, though.
Posted by jacquespene8
Nashville, TN
Member since Sep 2007
4148 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 4:50 pm to
My first reaction is to think that 40 years is too much. But as I think more about it, 40 years sounds about right. You just can't go around pouring boiling water on people. Everybody knows the agony that boiling water can cause, both immediately and for long periods thereafter. This guy is demented. And I come to this conclusion having never considered the nature of the victims' sexual orientation.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71429 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

If I shot you because you slept with my wife,


I think that's a mitigating circumstance in some states.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram