- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Spinoff - Which MLB teams actually need a new stadium?
Posted on 5/20/16 at 10:13 am
Posted on 5/20/16 at 10:13 am
Rangers thread got me thinking...
Tampa Bay
Oakland
Toronto?
Chicago White Sox?
Tampa Bay
Oakland
Toronto?
Chicago White Sox?
Posted on 5/20/16 at 10:14 am to RoscoeHarper
Tampa Oakland and Toronto are really the only three
I've been to US Cellular and I liked it
The Angels stadium is getting up there in years. I've never been so I have no idea how much it's been renovated, but I could see that as another
I've been to US Cellular and I liked it
The Angels stadium is getting up there in years. I've never been so I have no idea how much it's been renovated, but I could see that as another
This post was edited on 5/20/16 at 10:16 am
Posted on 5/20/16 at 10:17 am to RoscoeHarper
Considering Coors Field is now the 3rd oldest in the NL, very few. Tampa and Oakland seem to be the only two urgently needing a replacement. Toronto could use one but Rogers Centre seems functional at least.
Posted on 5/20/16 at 10:24 am to RoscoeHarper
Seems like the Angels would get one here soon. 3rd or 4th oldest stadium in the game. I know it was renovated, but that was almost 20 years ago
Posted on 5/20/16 at 10:24 am to RoscoeHarper
Just Tampa Bay and Oakland.
Posted on 5/20/16 at 10:35 am to RoscoeHarper
TB and Oakland are the only two that need a new place.
Posted on 5/20/16 at 10:42 am to RoscoeHarper
Just Tampa Bay, honestly.
I love watching games in stadiums that have very unique qualities, and the coliseum in Oakland isn't falling apart or anything.
But Tropicana is an absolute dump and an embarrassment to baseball. It looks like their carpet of a field has AIDS.
I love watching games in stadiums that have very unique qualities, and the coliseum in Oakland isn't falling apart or anything.
But Tropicana is an absolute dump and an embarrassment to baseball. It looks like their carpet of a field has AIDS.
Posted on 5/20/16 at 11:33 am to RoscoeHarper
Tampa and Oakland are the only ones that need a new stadium. There are some others that need a renovation, but not replacing.
Posted on 5/20/16 at 11:52 am to RoscoeHarper
TBH I think only Tampa and Oakland need new stadiums, excluding old stadiums with historical significance (Fenway, Wrigley, Dodger Stadium, etc.)Those places should just be renovated and improved, not replaced. As a baseball fan it was sad to see the house that Ruth built bulldozed for that shopping mall they have now
This post was edited on 5/20/16 at 11:56 am
Posted on 5/20/16 at 11:52 am to RoscoeHarper
quote:
Chicago White Sox?
This can't be serious.
Posted on 5/20/16 at 12:00 pm to RoscoeHarper
Rangers ballpark is actually kinda nice. Needs retractable roof in Dallas though.
Us cellular is relatively new
Us cellular is relatively new
Posted on 5/21/16 at 9:42 am to RoscoeHarper
I kind of like that Tampa's stadium is laughably bad.
Posted on 5/21/16 at 4:46 pm to RoscoeHarper
quote:
Toronto? Chicago White Sox?
Both these are safe.....
Posted on 5/21/16 at 4:48 pm to RoscoeHarper
I haven't been to angels stadium or whatever they call it in a few years but it's fine. It is similar to the stadium the Phillies play in
Posted on 5/22/16 at 4:48 pm to RoscoeHarper
The Cell is not interesting and it's upper deck is way too steep. But there's nothing wrong with it in the sense that it's substandard. The mistake was not building it downtown
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News