Started By
Message

re: Leonard Fournette IS what Cecil Collins COULD have been....

Posted on 9/20/15 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by HeauxBeaux
Member since Mar 2008
5538 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Leonard Fournette IS what Cecil Collins wish he COULD have been

Proofread and edited for accuracy
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112660 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Fournette is on a completely different level It's insulting to compare Collins to him


I agree. Cecil did not have the leg drive that Fournette has when contact occurs.
Posted by BasClas
Member since Feb 2007
7881 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

For those of you too young to have been there for Cecil Collins vs. Auburn, we felt the same about him afterwards that you feel for Fournette today. We were in awe. He had other world ability that was not measurable. LF is Cecil with good mental health. LF is truly amazing but to say Cecil wasn't is simply not true. Cecil just wasn't a good person, but he was a once in a few decades back like LF is



very well said, and accurate.

Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20502 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Anyway, no way Diesel was this good. No way.

LF7 makes it look effortless.
Spoken like a man who didn't see Collins play live.

Cecil the Diesel's legend is legit, and if anything, he had a more impressive beginning. You're not taking this into account: Fournette has a year under his belt, a season where he looked awesome at times, but also average at times too. Collins, on the other hand: he was coming to a team with Kevin Faulk, who was being compared already to Tony Dorsett (a Heisman Trophy winner and NFL HOF'er for the youngsters); and all Collins did was come in, produce 3 straight games similar to what Fournette did yesterday, get hurt, and then vanish into infamy

Fournette looks to be insanely good, but for those who weren't around for it: yes, Collins looked just as good. And the best point of reference was that he looked so much better, in ways, than Faulk, who was an All-American talent.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20502 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

Fournette is on a completely different level It's insulting to compare Collins to him


I agree. Cecil did not have the leg drive that Fournette has when contact occurs.
Are you ignorant, or just trolling? Collins absolutely ran with as much power. And he was doing it against much better Auburn linebackers (i.e. Takeo Spikes) than what the Barn fielded yesterday.
Posted by lindsfav
Member since Jan 2006
198 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:12 pm to
Agree that leg drive by Collins was unreal. Always going forward. I think in this assessment better than LF. Collins had an uncanny ability to create contact on purpose then seperate from the tackler and keep going. He used contact as a tool.
Posted by JYD
Pineville
Member since Oct 2003
7751 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:15 pm to
I was at the Auburn game in 97 and was at the game yesterday. I can't say which one is better because their running styles are totally different. CC probably had better moves and vision where LF just runs over people. Something I didnt see brought up was how Auburn's and State's 97 defenses Would compare to their 15 defenses. I would say both units were probably better in 97. That doesn't mean I think CC was better, but you can't discount what he did because he only played in 3 games.
This post was edited on 9/20/15 at 4:17 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112660 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

Agree that leg drive by Collins was unreal


Oh, it was real. That's why his leg broke.
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:19 pm to
Wrong. Collins never could have been Leonard.


Morons like you need to get something. Leonard is a once every 50 years type talent.
Posted by geauxjo
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2004
14785 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:20 pm to
quote:


For those of you too young to have been there for Cecil Collins vs. Auburn, we felt the same about him afterwards that you feel for Fournette today. We were in awe. He had other world ability that was not measurable. LF is Cecil with good mental health. LF is truly amazing but to say Cecil wasn't is simply not true. Cecil just wasn't a good person, but he was a once in a few decades back like LF is.


Thanks for bringing perspective. Man, either a bunch of kids in here or adults that don't understand how special of a back CC was. It's not tainting LF to compare him to Deisel as a back. Up until this season CC was the best back (though with a small sample) most had ever seen in p&g. That's changing quickly. And I'd add LFs sample is still small too. His freshman season wasn't better than all previous. It's also ironic that CC's stats were very similar and against the exact same teams.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11215 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:21 pm to
It really is a good comparison for those too young to remember the diesel. Now you see what all the fuss was about. Picture a guy coming in and doing what fournette has done this year and then never playing another down for the Tigers.
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38430 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:22 pm to
I agree and any talk to the contrary is plain idiotic.

Went to many many LSU games in the 90s. Cecil wasn't as good as Faulk. And I think LF7 breaks all of his records.

Maybe some in his sophomore season.
Posted by geauxjo
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2004
14785 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Cecil wasn't as good as Faulk.



Ok bro.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11215 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:27 pm to
Faulk is my favorite all time tiger for what he did for the program. But Cecil was better.
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38430 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:33 pm to
He wasn't. Not at LSU nor in the pros.

Surely, simple statistics can show you that.

And the fact that the guy is/was/will always be a criminal has to have some stake in this matter?

You can say all you want that he was talented and gifted more so than Faulk or LF7 all you want. The numbers don't lie; and I'll go to those first before I deem someone the GOAT.
Posted by ColdDuck
BR via da Parish
Member since Sep 2006
2775 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:34 pm to
I only own one jersey, and never wear it...but it says diesel on the back. He was a legend that vanished into infamy.
Posted by JYD
Pineville
Member since Oct 2003
7751 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Faulk is my favorite all time tiger for what he did for the program.

agree
quote:

But Cecil was better.
agree again
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46627 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

Collins GOAT


Holy shite. I've never seen a more hyped player off of 4 games. Yes I saw all 72 carries Collins had at lsu. Yes he had a great 4 game stretch against 3 scrubs and a 10-3 Auburn team. The guy had 3 tds for his career. Let it go. He had a good 4 game stretch but that's where it ends. He isn't even a top 20 Rb at lsu.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46627 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

The lack of respect for Collins is shocking


What's shocking is the GOAT status for a rb with 72 carries and 3 tds for his career. He ran well against 3 scrubs and Auburn. So what.
quote:

He was a great RB in the short time he played.

A lot of rbs could be great running behind that 1997 line. MCCLURE,FANECA,PERRY,JACKSON,
LANGLEY,with the one of the best fbs in lsu history TOMMY BANKS.
Posted by geauxjo
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2004
14785 posts
Posted on 9/20/15 at 4:52 pm to
quote:


You can say all you want that he was talented and gifted more so than Faulk or LF7 all you want. The numbers don't lie; and I'll go to those first before I deem someone the GO


The numbers in the games he played in sure don't lie. What you're saying is those were a fluke and he'd never have carried on with those type numbers. I say his talent was obvious and he surely would have. You're also alluding to the fact you think LF will continue to produce the type numbers he did in the last 2 games. He hasn't yet. You think he will. I do too but it's not at all a stretch to compare the 2 now and say for the few games CC played in he was mind-blowing.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram