Started By
Message

Ring Magazine ranking of best boxers since World War II

Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:28 am
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33967 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:28 am
quote:

The Ring decided to ask some of the most knowledgeable boxing historians and writers to give us their opinions in the form of a poll. Specifically, we asked 20 of them to rank their Top 20 modern fighters pound for pound. We used the International Boxing Hall of Fame’s criterion for “modern”: Last bout no earlier than 1943.

Of course, that eliminates a lot of great fighters who fought before 1943 but we felt that comparing fighters from the same or adjacent eras is difficult enough. To compare boxers who might’ve fought a century or more apart is fun but, we believed, less meaningful.

To be clear, we instructed each of the participants to at least consider active fighters or recently retired ones, as we wanted every boxer who has fought since World War II to be in the pool of candidates.

We awarded points based on the voting – 20 points for a first-place vote, 19 for a second-place vote and so on. 








1. Sugar Ray Robinson - 396 - (17)
2. Henry Armstrong - 339 - (1)
3. Muhammad Ali - 324 - (1)
4. Roberto Duran - 296
5. Joe Louis - 293
6. Ray Leonard - 258
7. Willie Pep - 246 - (1)
8. Archie Moore - 189
9. Julio Cesar Chavez - 171
10. Ezzard Charles - 164
11. Pernell Whitaker - 132
12. Floyd Mayweather Jr - 118
13. Marvin Hagler - 117
14. Carlos Monzon - 98
15. Eder Jofre - 86
16. Sandy Saddler - 82
17. Roy Jones Jr - 80
18. Rocky Marciano - 77
19. Bernard Hopkins - 66
20. Ike Williams - 55
21. Charley Burley - 54
22. Evander Holyfield - 42
23. George Foreman - 41
24. Billy Conn - 39
25t. Manny Pacquiao - 36
25t. Larry Holmes - 36
27. Kid Gavilian - 28
27. Salvador Sanchez - 28
29. Emile Griffith - 27
29. Jose Napoles - 27
29. Holman Williams - 27
32. Mike Tyson - 26
33. Joe Frazier - 22
34. Alexis Arguello - 20
34. Marcel Cerdan - 20
34. Carlos Ortiz - 20
37. Ricardo Lopez - 19
38. Jake Lamotta - 17
38. Ruben Olivares - 17
40. Pascual Perez - 12
41. Oscar De La Hoya - 9
41. Michael Spinks - 9
41. Marco Antonio Barrera - 9
44. Thomas Hearns - 7
45. Miguel Canto - 5
45. Bob Foster - 5
47. Jimmy Bivins - 4
47. Lennox Lewis - 4
49. Sammy Angott - 3

This post was edited on 4/25/15 at 7:41 am
Posted by TheOcean
#honeyfriedchicken
Member since Aug 2004
42553 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:29 am to
Floyd Mayweather...owned
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23136 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:32 am to
Wonder how this would change if he wastes Pac next weekend...and if it would change more if they have a rematch and he wins convincingly again

I'm not saying that happens, but how "set" is this list for some of these guys
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85138 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:34 am to
quote:

32. Mike Tyson - 26


This seems a little low considering he had one of the most dominating runs in boxing history.
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123717 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:39 am to
Mike Tyson at fricking 32? LOL
Posted by bubbz
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
22835 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:51 am to
I agree on Tyson being too low.

Also surprised not to see Lennox Lewis.
Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:52 am to
hearns? ...
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136852 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:57 am to
who did Tyson beat of note?

Nobody, that's who
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
83409 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 9:59 am to
No Felix Trinidad?
Posted by TheOcean
#honeyfriedchicken
Member since Aug 2004
42553 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Wonder how this would change if he wastes Pac next weekend.


If he beat Pac three years ago it probably would have bumped him up a few. Beating Pac now means very little IMO
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
83409 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:02 am to
quote:

40. Pascual Perez - 12









There is only one Pascual Perez in my book
Posted by Palo Gaucho
Benton
Member since Jul 2013
3337 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:05 am to
I'm surprised Frazier is ranked behind Holyfield, Foreman, and Holmes.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85138 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:07 am to
quote:

who did Tyson beat of note?

Nobody, that's who


Fair enough, but even if you criticize him for his competition, he disposed of them the way no boxer did before and no boxer will do again.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41244 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Mike Tyson at fricking 32? LOL


when Ring magazine did their 80 best boxers for the last 80 years, Tyson game in at #72
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Floyd Mayweather...owned


He's 12th. That's higher than I would expect most people to rank him, as most people can't separate his persona from what he's accomplished in his career.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85138 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Also surprised not to see Lennox Lewis.


Yeah no shite...
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125479 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:13 am to
quote:

If he beat Pac three years ago it probably would have bumped him up a few. Beating Pac now means very little IMO



meh he is still older than Pac
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41244 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:17 am to
quote:

I'm surprised Frazier is ranked behind Holyfield


Holyfield had over 15 fights against boxers who won the Heavyweight title, none of them knocked him out. (Not even counting the Russians)

Buster Douglas
Mike Tyson X2
Larry Holmes
Michael Moore X2
Hasim Rahman
George Forman
Riddick Bowe X3
John Ruiz X3
Lennox Lewis X2
Posted by Jamohn
Das Boot
Member since Mar 2009
13544 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:19 am to
I don't have too many problems with this list. Quick first glance I think Holmes and Foreman are both too low.

I think Tyson is appropriately ranked but that always rustles the jimmies of people who were mystified by his incredible highlight reels. Hell, I loved watching him fight too, but I think he's where he belongs on this list.

Ezzard Charles always seems to be a darling of the analysts and expert historians. I just don't regard him quite as highly as these lists tend to do.
Posted by SportsGuyNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2014
17175 posts
Posted on 4/24/15 at 10:27 am to
quote:

who did Tyson beat of note?

Nobody, that's who


BINGO!!!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram