Started By
Message
locked post

There is no freedom of religion unless there's freedom from it

Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:14 pm
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:14 pm
Want more evidence that Antonin Scalia is a dishonest cleric in Supreme Court justice garb?

Scalia attacks the separation of church and state

Scalia probably knows, as should any school kid, that language in the Bill of Rights which would have merely prevented the establishment of a state religion was VOTED DOWN in favor of a much broader prohibition: that Congress should make no law RESPECTING THE ESTABLISHMENT thereof. In other words, any law that would intentionally favor one religion or no religion is PROHIBITED.



Posted by House_of Cards
Pascagoula, MS
Member since Dec 2013
3927 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

any law that would intentionally favor one religion or no religion is PROHIBITED.


Is it even possible for everything to remain so completely neutral that no one gets pissed?
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71681 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:17 pm to
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40221 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:22 pm to
Didn't read, voted down dog boy
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:22 pm to
He didn't say there should be a state religion.

Answer the question he posed Rex.

quote:

“Our [the Supreme Court’s] latest take on the subject, which is quite different from previous takes, is that the state must be neutral, not only between religions, but between religion and nonreligion,” Scalia said on Wednesday, according to The Washington Times. “That’s just a lie. Where do you get the notion that this is all unconstitutional? You can only believe that if you believe in a morphing Constitution.”

If Americans want a more secular political system that guarantees those distinctions, they can “enact that by statute,” Scalia said, “but to say that’s what the Constitution requires is utterly absurd.”


He is exactly right. If we want a more secular political system we can pass an amendment. A logical thing to do and central to his premise the Constitution is not a living document and I am glad it is not.

What is wrong with his position in your opinion Rex?
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49124 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 5:57 pm to
Down vote off [on]
Posted by Reubaltaich
A nation under duress
Member since Jun 2006
4976 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 6:10 pm to
No one is forcing you to attend a church or even say a prayer.

But you might want to try it, it just may do you some good.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127061 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

There is no freedom of religion unless there's freedom from it
You left off "prohibiting the free exercise thereof" clause.

Why?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68625 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 6:51 pm to
If a religion includes a duty to prosteletize, then the only way to be free from it is to ban it.

These are incompatible.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124455 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

There is no freedom of religion unless there's freedom from it
No.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

That's it.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 7:26 pm to
Environmentalism is a form of religion IMO.

Does 'religion' have to involve a deity?
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46590 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 7:32 pm to
Freedom from religion implies you have the right to not ever have to encounter religion in your day to day life, which is neither realistic nor the intention of the first amendment.

Everyone has the freedom to not practice religion and be free from theocratic legislation, but you aren't guaranteed the right to never be exposed to it.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 7:49 pm to
The Constitution prohibits a state religion to protect the state and prohibits the state from persecuting the individual.

Individuals are being persecuted all over the place.
Posted by Paluka
One State Over
Member since Dec 2010
10763 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 7:52 pm to
His position is correct, Rex. If you didn't have such a doggy boner for Scalia you'd see his point.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 8:26 pm to
I'm with you on everything, except religion..

Thus, I must downvote.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71611 posts
Posted on 10/19/14 at 8:32 pm to
You really are a trash poster, and I'm not religious.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58281 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 6:20 am to
quote:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;



Selective reading much?
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76709 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 6:24 am to
Congress definitely has no issue making laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion.
Posted by UPT
NOLA
Member since May 2009
5517 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 7:29 am to
quote:

Antonin Scalia is a dishonest cleric


REX MUST DIE

Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35085 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 7:59 am to
Freedom? There is no freedom in Government unless there is freedom from it.

Should just leave Religion out of it, Rex. "Congress shall make NO LAW...". Progressive ideology manipulates Law to change Religion. Unintended consequences. Live and learn.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram