- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can someone remind me why we let Darren Sproles go?
Posted on 9/15/14 at 10:33 pm to saintsfan22
Posted on 9/15/14 at 10:33 pm to saintsfan22
Are you arguing just to argue?
1
Posted on 9/15/14 at 10:36 pm to Hoodoo Man
Oh no Patrick Robinson playing is 10 on 11 same as Porter would be. Except for when Robinson is committing penalties of course.
This post was edited on 9/15/14 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 9/15/14 at 10:41 pm to saintsfan22
I'm with the guy who said why couldn't we have Sproles and Cooks?
MIND BLOWN!
I would trade Ingram for sproles back any day!
MIND BLOWN!
I would trade Ingram for sproles back any day!
Posted on 9/15/14 at 10:48 pm to Tiger Nation 84
Aren't you the guy that would rather have Leonard Fournette instead of Ingram right now?
Posted on 9/15/14 at 10:48 pm to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
I would trade Ingram for sproles back any day
What in the mother-fricking frick....
Ingram has been outstanding thus far. Please, get the frick out of here, you idiot.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:00 pm to Crow Pie
I would love to have Sproles back. The Eagles were moving down the field at will just by throwing him screen passes. Why did we let him go? We thought age was catching up with him.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:01 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Thanks for adding nothing of value to this conversation at no time did I say cooks wasn't a good decision. I stated earlier in this thread Cooks has more upside. The fact is there are far more dynamic wide receivers than there are pass catching running backs and the saints are worse off by not having that offensive weapon
This post was edited on 9/15/14 at 11:04 pm
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:02 pm to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
I'm with the guy who said why couldn't we have Sproles and Cooks?
im with the guy who follows the team and realizes we were going to end up having to cut Sproles. he was going to become a cap casualty. getting a pick for him was a gift.
also, when was it decided that Cooks should be brought into this conversation. Sproles being traded had to due with contracts.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:05 pm to BlacknGold
quote:
also, when was it decided that Cooks should be brought into this conversation. Sproles being traded had to due with Brees's contract.
Fify
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:07 pm to Crow Pie
We chose PT over Sproles and it was the right call
We signed the top free agent available, so blaming Brees is retarded
We signed the top free agent available, so blaming Brees is retarded
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:08 pm to LSU5508
quote:
The fact is there are far more dynamic wide receivers than there are pass catching running backs and the saints are worse off by not having that offensive weapon
You realize PT had 77 receptions last year. He's a better runner and a better screen catcher
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:08 pm to Crow Pie
There threads are dumb. You can't keep everyone it's okay for a former Saints player to do well with another team. We have Cooks and I'm satisfied
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:09 pm to Crow Pie
so you "fixed" it by bringing up even more irrelevant things? 
you couldve done a better job at trolling by naming Graham.
you couldve done a better job at trolling by naming Graham.
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:13 pm to BlacknGold
he doesnt look over the hill to me. 
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:29 pm to TutHillTiger
Yet...
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:31 pm to TutHillTiger
True Championships are not decided in September. Sproles has never been on a Conference Championship NFL Team.
Mike Bell has a Super Bowl Ring...what does that tell you?
Saints made the right call. Ingram, Robinson, and Thomas are a great trio of backs. Colston, Graham, Cooks, and Stills are great receiving options. Our line is solid...so our future hinges on a top 5 D a year ago and a HOF QB...I like our chances over Foles and the Eagles
Mike Bell has a Super Bowl Ring...what does that tell you?
Saints made the right call. Ingram, Robinson, and Thomas are a great trio of backs. Colston, Graham, Cooks, and Stills are great receiving options. Our line is solid...so our future hinges on a top 5 D a year ago and a HOF QB...I like our chances over Foles and the Eagles
This post was edited on 9/15/14 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:37 pm to partywiththelombardi
+1
If we are 2-0 or even 1-1 75% of these trash arse threads would have never been started
If we are 2-0 or even 1-1 75% of these trash arse threads would have never been started
Posted on 9/15/14 at 11:52 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
You realize PT had 77 receptions last year. He's a better runner and a better screen catcher
And he's the most complete back of the 4 we had last year. He's the best pass protector of the 3 we have on the team right now. He's arguably the best 3rd down back as well. If Ingram goes down (which he has his WHOLE NFL career) for some time and you have Khiry and Sproles (but no PT), you have issues with pass protection.
Khiry isn't a great blocker, nor is Sproles.
PT was a safety net to Ingram's injury history and its still the right move as of right now. I bet this week he goes for something like 10 rushes 40-50 yards and 5 catches for 60 yards.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 5:50 am to Crow Pie
Oh look another idiot blaming the brees contract.
Where do you prople come from?
Any one who thinks sproles wouldve made a difference between 0-2/2-0 isnt worth discussong with.
Sproles wouldnt have helped the D against ATL or PRobs atrocius performance against cle.
Fricking idiots.
Where do you prople come from?
Any one who thinks sproles wouldve made a difference between 0-2/2-0 isnt worth discussong with.
Sproles wouldnt have helped the D against ATL or PRobs atrocius performance against cle.
Fricking idiots.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 6:52 am to LosLobos111
The thing a lot of you guys are not accounting for is the coaching & scheme to match your personnel......Execution hasn't been the greatest in our passing game, but it's been Payton who continues to pass at inopportune times....Sproles got the bulk of his yards on screen passes, yet our screen passes haven't done squat and the reason for that is not personnel, but again it's the timing of the plays being called....Sproles would not be making a difference on our screens so far this year when they are 2-3 defensive players on the runner in the back field
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News