Started By
Message

re: Kareem Abdul Jabbar weighs in on pay for college athletes

Posted on 7/26/14 at 8:19 am to
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 8:19 am to
And why is that a problem?
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Probably the fact that they are teenagers.

They are adults. They are allowed to start their own businesses. What is keeping them from doing so and capitalizing on their services?
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14654 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 8:51 am to
I don't get it. Aren't athletes technically getting "paid". They get free tuition, room and board, dining bucks that's roughly at least 30-40k a year they are getting "paid"
Posted by OutofTownAlumni
Member since Nov 2013
3036 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 9:14 am to
It's a problem because most agents are scum and they will promise too many things. Having kids leave school early and be out of their pro sport in 2 years.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 9:18 am to
I usually like Kareems comments, but I'm with rtr on this one.

I hate that inflammatory indentured servant bullshite language. One it is a not so subtle reference to blacks and slavery. Two it is fricking stupid. I paid and worked my way through 5 years of college with no support in or out of the classroom except myself. Busted arse to get a master's with honors, worked part time jobs almost the entire time to have enough money to survive and took out tens of thousands in loans that I had to pay back for years.

Athletes have all that taken care of. It's much more like they have a silver spoon in their mouth than an indentured servant in a sweat shop. Let them try it my way. Most would flunk out and quit immediately. And I could do it their way, no doubt about it. Would be fine switching places with one of them in a second.
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
61757 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 9:26 am to
quote:

but you could let players negotiate their own deals with Nike, Adidas, etc.


LOL You can't even possibly think this would work


Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
17185 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 9:27 am to
Stupidity.

Who is going to pay them anyway??

[link=(Just 23 of 228 athletics departments at NCAA Division I public schools generated enough money on their own to cover their expenses in 2012.)]Most NCAA Division I athletic departments take subsidies[/link]

quote:

Just 23 of 228 athletics departments at NCAA Division I public schools generated enough money on their own to cover their expenses in 2012.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20030 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 10:12 am to
I wonder if Kareem does anything to support actual sweat shop workers.

Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20829 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 10:23 am to
quote:

The people who treat the issue like this infuriate me. I'm completely fine with the idea that players should get paid, but when someone makes an extreme comparison like this I can't help but shake my head.

Posted by Dalosaqy
I can't quite re
Member since Dec 2007
12311 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 10:34 am to
quote:

One it is a not so subtle reference to blacks and slavery
True, but only because we are a racially sensitive culture in this regard. The term indentured servitude does not on its face carry any such meaning.
This post was edited on 7/26/14 at 10:35 am
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18986 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Maybe not, but you could let players negotiate their own deals with Nike, Adidas, etc. Let them have jobs like normal students. Let them actually cash in on their own name.


When they become professionals they can do all that + get a salary. It isn't the NCAA's problem that the pro leagues won't let them.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Maybe not, but you could let players negotiate their own deals with Nike, Adidas, etc. Let them have jobs like normal students. Let them actually cash in on their own name.


1. The vast majority of the schools these athletes play for are sponsored by 1 apparel provider. Why would anybody but nike sign a player from Lsu or Florida? And then along those same lines, all of the players from Lsu and Florida are already required to wear nike apparel. What incentive would nike have give extra money to a player at a school they are already paying to wear their things anyway?

2. A huge argument for the pay athletes side is that the athletes need to be subsidized because their schedules don't allow time for a job, "like normal students" as you put it. Nike and Adidas wouldn't be interested in signing the backup deep snapper, but his schedule precludes him from getting a job just as much as the starting qb. So exactly what problems have been solved here?
This post was edited on 7/26/14 at 10:55 am
Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
4420 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

It's a problem because most agents are scum and they will promise too many things. Having kids leave school early and be out of their pro sport in 2 years.



How is that different from most coaches?
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10462 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

2. A huge argument for the pay athletes side is that the athletes need to be subsidized because their schedules don't allow time for a job, "like normal students" as you put it. Nike and Adidas wouldn't be interested in signing the backup deep snapper, but his schedule precludes him from getting a job just as much as the starting qb. So exactly what problems have been solved here?


Student athletes get more monetary support than any other scholarship recipients at universities. They get plenty of freer stuff that other students do not. Just like academic scholarships, they are performance based. Don't perform academically while on scholarship, you lose it.

Also, indentured servants had no way out of their contracts. A college athlete can leave at any time without repercussion. They simply lose their scholarship. in the end the athlete whining is just pathetic.
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
54967 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 1:42 pm to
Muslim
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78034 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 2:15 pm to
College athletes get far more benefits than the typical scholarship student. They are compensated plenty. No one is forcing them to be athletes.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30125 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 2:40 pm to
I see them playing college ball/sports as an internship.

Some internships you don't get paid, but the company benefits off you by free labor. Internships are used for people to get a foot in the door (i.e. The draft for these students), right?

But these players in school, they get paid in different ways.

Food Stipends
Tutors
Scholarships to the school (I mean, lets be honest, half of these players at Ivy Leagues couldn't even get in)

Who's fault is it that they don't try hard to benefit from the academics of college, theirs.
This post was edited on 7/26/14 at 2:41 pm
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36130 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 2:59 pm to
the sweat shop analogy is terrible because of hyperbole. if he just made a fairness argument and stuck to that much he would have been on solid footing.

The "sweat shops" in which college athletes play today are among the nicest facilities in the world. Should the athletes get some of the money from television revenue etc? Perhaps so, but if you argue for this you also have to make a comprehensive argument for how this affects Title IX (an argument the courts will respect). Ideally you should also discuss how the monies distributed will or won't likely affect the different levels of students playing either other sports or at less profitable schools.
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

the sweat shop analogy is terrible because of hyperbole. if he just made a fairness argument and stuck to that much he would have been on solid footing.


Yep. If you want to attack an aspect of college sports that's really BS, it's the complete sham of the 20 hour weekly limit. In season, you have a lot of these kids putting in close to 40 hours (and not just for the glamor sports) and that really puts a wrench into class and study time. Assuming you'll even be allowed to take the class you want in the first place.

But, of course, it's really all about the cash.
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 7/26/14 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Ok, here is a solution.

Pay all athletes but quit giving scholarships. If your getting paid then you pay for your own ride. Books, housing, food, everything.




I've been on this side for awhile.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram