menu
Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1487
Registered on:11/29/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
re: Final Miles analysis: Pumpers vs Negatigers - Open Your Eyes
[quote]alabama and Clemson both had to fire multiple coaches in between ones that won conference championships. [/quote] Alabama and Clemson were both perennial top 25 teams when they fired their previous coach. The new coach has brought both of them to new levels. Wisconsin has done just as m...
Posted on Tiger Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: Final Miles analysis: Pumpers vs Negatigers - Open Your Eyes
Who said anything about winning national titles? Your first post certainly didn't. Why are you bringing it up now? All of the program's I listed are in as good or better states now than when the previous coach left them. That's what your original post was implying is probably not going to happen ...
Posted on Tiger Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Final Miles analysis: Pumpers vs Negatigers - Open Your Eyes
[quote]75helpmacpack[/quote] Good to know you are happy leading a life content with mediocrity. Talk to me about Alabama, Ohio st, Florida st, Clemson, Wisconsin while you're at it....
Posted on Tiger Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (2)
re: Final Miles analysis: Pumpers vs Negatigers - Open Your Eyes
[quote]Please explain how 4 top 16 finishes in 5 years means lsu isnt a top 25 program. My god our fans are dumb.[/quote] Where is Lsu ranked right now, when miles left? Not in the top 25? Oh ok, that's what I thought. ...
Posted on Tiger Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (2)
re: Final Miles analysis: Pumpers vs Negatigers - Open Your Eyes
[quote]I havent seen anyone say it wasnt time.[/quote] Actions speak louder than words....
Posted on Tiger Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: Final Miles analysis: Pumpers vs Negatigers - Open Your Eyes
[quote]Your record is what makes you a top 5 program. Please explain how 1 top 5 finish in over 2 decades makes lsu a top 5 program? Agreed. That in of itself doesnt mean he left Lsu as a top 5 program.[/quote] Oh, you amusing little simpleton. By your very own logic, miles left Lsu as a n...
Posted on Tiger Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: The Jimbo rumor has legs..... - Open Your Eyes
[quote]Pretty sure CharlesLSU is a former LSU player and has some connections close to the program. I wouldn't scoff at it so fast.[/quote] He loves to make people think he's important, that's for sure. ...
Posted on Tiger Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]Why during the first rule of the targeting rule could the ejection be overturned on review but not the penalty itself?[/quote] So your defense of one shitty rule is to say "look at this other shifty rule"? [quote]Everything in the book may not always make perfect sense to everyone. When...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]Why during the first rule of the targeting rule could the ejection be overturned on review but not the penalty itself?[/quote] So your defense of one shitty rule is to say "look at this other shifty rule"? [quote]Everything in the book may not always make perfect sense to everyone. When...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]It's because you're not paying attention. The question is about why the rule book mandates stopping the clock on a penalty on plays inbounds short of a first down. The rule book specifically mentions stopping it on those plays because those are the only plays where the clock is still running ...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]Literally everything I said is applicable. The rule specifically talks about stopping the clock on a tackle in bounds short of the line to gain. Penalties on any other play don't stop the clock because it's already stopped.[/quote] 1. I'm not sure how you think responding to something talk...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (2)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]Sure, there are plenty of ways to gain an advantage in football. [/quote] None of which include intentionally committing a penalty. [quote]Have you ever seen this happen? I haven't. [/quote] 1. That specific instance? No. The idea of an offense benefitting from stopping the clock by...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]Theoretically, perhaps. I don't know if a player in the heat of the moment would think to tackle using the face mask just to stop the clock. If it ever happens in a big game, and people make a big deal about it, it might be changed. That's how rules changes happen sometimes. edit...it would...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]So we're just making up rules now?[/quote] Are you only capable of trying to twist me giving an opinion on a possible rule into me making up rules, and not actually answering any questions?...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]UpToPar[/quote] 8 seconds left, Offense has no timeouts, completes a pass in the middle of the field. Ball carrier is obviously going to be tackled in bounds, time is likely going to runout before the ball is snapped. Offensive player sees all of this, intentionally commits a live ball pen...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]Tackles after the line to gain or out of bounds stop the clock anyway...penalty or no penalty. [/quote] Again, the rule specifically mentions tackled in bounds short of line to gain. Literally nothing of what you just said is applicable. ...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]No, we aren't pretending that. But they could have done the same thing while they were spotting the ball after the 1st down if there wasn't a penalty.[/quote] 1. As I said, one of the rules specifically references ball carrier stopped in bounds short of the line to gain. 2. I don't eve...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]Why would there be a ten-second runoff? It's a dead ball foul. There are no ten-second penalties for dead ball fouls.[/quote] Please explain, because the rules seem to state exactly the opposite of that. ...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
[quote]It's in reference to the clock starting at the refs signal or at the snap. If it causes the clock to start at the snap, then there's a runoff. That wasn't the case in last night's game.[/quote] Again, I get that. But are we just pretending that the offense is not allowed to move and get th...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift - Open Your Eyes
Can we have a discussion about this actual rule, and not what happened in the game? Up until last night, my understanding was that the following circumstances would lead to a 10 second clock runoff: Clock under 1 minute + Clock was moving prior to the start of play + no timeouts for offense +...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (8)