- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Young Earth Creationism and Public Schools...
Posted on 7/5/14 at 11:52 am to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 7/5/14 at 11:52 am to Roger Klarvin
Of course it is. To you. 2+2=4 would be gibberish to an ant.
Bearing witness to exactly my point.
Good luck.
Bearing witness to exactly my point.
Good luck.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 11:54 am to RCDfan1950
You cant throw together multiple unrelated scientific principles, slap a few pretty words around them and call it a point.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 11:59 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Can you explain why you believe this, preferably without the subjective biblical narrative?
there's no other way to explain it
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:01 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
You cant throw together multiple unrelated scientific principles, slap a few pretty words around them and call it a point.
"Unrelated scientific principles".
And I'm spouting gibberish.
I'd be willing to go out on a limb here, and posit the idea that a Universal Axiom...would be that there is NOTHING that is "unrelated". Not that it matters to the joe on the street. Or whomever. Matters a lot to me.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:05 pm to RCDfan1950
You don't even know what some of those words mean.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:19 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:How about let's just keep them out of classrooms.
Should we cut out those parents' tongues, simply jail them, or just burn a bunch of A Beka Books
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:24 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:No.
You cant throw together multiple unrelated scientific principles, slap a few pretty words around them and call it a point.
Far better to term that Anthropogenic Global Warming theory.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:26 pm to FT
quote:How does that work with home schooling?
How about let's just keep them out of classrooms.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:28 pm to NC_Tigah
I don't know. I already said I'm not sure how I'd address this.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:35 pm to FT
quote:You address it by addressing it, not running from it, not shutting it down. If it's a slam dunk, slam dunk the damn thing!
I already said I'm not sure how I'd address this.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:35 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Can you explain why you believe this, preferably without the subjective biblical narrative?
My positions;
- God created the universe out of nothing (ex nihilo) for His purpose and plan.
- I am created in the image of God.
I work from those two positions forward and outward in how I view the universe.
That is the best place to start.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:38 pm to Wolfhound45
I understand that, I'm asking WHY you believe that. What reason do you have for believing the earth is young and that evolution never occurred? What reason do you have for accepting the premise that God, and specifically the God of the Bible, created everything and if he did why he did it in the last 10,000 years?
If your honest with yourself, I believe the only truly objective answer is that it's because it's what you've been taught.
If your honest with yourself, I believe the only truly objective answer is that it's because it's what you've been taught.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:45 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
I understand that, I'm asking WHY you believe that. What reason do you have for believing the earth is young and that evolution never occurred? What reason do you have for accepting the premise that God, and specifically the God of the Bible, created everything and if he did why he did it in the last 10,000 years?
If your honest with yourself, I believe the only truly objective answer is that it's because it's what you've been taught.
It is called world view. You have one as well (as evidenced by your post). You view everything forwards and outwards based upon that world view. What you have been taught. You see all evidence in that light. As do I.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:49 pm to Wolfhound45
FWIW, I believe in intelligent design based purely on an inability to see a beginning of the universe without a prime mover.
As to NC_Tigah's post above, it's more complicated than that and you know it. I know, for example, that slavery in Africa needs to be exterminated. I'm also not sure how to fix it, but that doesn't mean I don't have a view on it.
As to NC_Tigah's post above, it's more complicated than that and you know it. I know, for example, that slavery in Africa needs to be exterminated. I'm also not sure how to fix it, but that doesn't mean I don't have a view on it.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:52 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
It is called world view. You have one as well (as evidenced by your post). You view everything forwards and outwards based upon that world view. What you have been taught. You see all evidence in that light. As do I.
What I believe about God and the universe is actually very different than what I was taught, and in many cases directly contradictory. I was taught similarly to how you were in fact.
I believe what I believe largely through years of personal reflection, study and attempts to better understand science and existence. Can you say the same?
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:59 pm to FT
quote:Poor analogy.
As to NC_Tigah's post above, it's more complicated than that and you know it. I know, for example, that slavery in Africa needs to be exterminated. I'm also not sure how to fix it, but that doesn't mean I don't have a view on it.
In academic matters, the way you win the moment is by taking opposing viewpoints on, head-to-head.
Rationalizing that it's OK to take Greek Mythology into the classroom, while declaring YEC anathema, is flatly bizarre. Bring it in! Bring it on! Address it! Science can stand the test. It really can.
This post was edited on 7/5/14 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:59 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
If your honest with yourself, I believe the only truly objective answer is that it's because it's what you've been taught.
Everyone has biases. It colors their interpretation of data, and their synthesis of data with other data.
The bible as a primary source of information is a good place to start though. Its internal consistency is remarkable. Its recorded number of fulfilled prophecies is astounding. As is its explanatory power for so much of the world around us. It also has tremendous explanatory power for things that an atheistic viewpoint does not, such as the origin of the universe, the origin of life, morality, beauty.
I am not a young earth creationist at this point, fwiw, although I have held that position before. Now I find old earth creationism to be more consistent with both the bible and the book of nature.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 1:14 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:Is it in science class? How is it discussed?
Rationalizing that it's OK to take Greek Mythology into the classroom
quote:Is it in science class? How is it discussed?
while declaring YEC anathema
quote:What are you suggesting? That we teach every possible idea, since science will win out, anyway?
Address it! Science can stand the test. It really can.
That's silly.
Posted on 7/5/14 at 1:14 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Can you say the same?
Absolutely Roger.
I am quite settled (and comfortable) in my world view. Is there any reason you would believe that I did not come to my position without the same degree of thought and reflection that you did? Am I somehow a lesser form of humanity because I believe an all poweful God created the universe? Somehow less rigorous in my thought process? Less intelligent? Is that what you are insinuating?
This post was edited on 7/5/14 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 7/5/14 at 1:16 pm to Qwerty
quote:
Its internal consistency is remarkable.
Not really, especially given that it's supposedly inspired by the perfect creator. Multiple geographical and historical errors for starters is a big red flag.
quote:
Its recorded number of fulfilled prophecies is astounding.
The only evidence for fulfilled prophecies in the Bible is the Bible. There is no outside authentication of fulfilled prophecy.
Moreover, there are multiple biblical prophecies that went unfulfilled.
quote:
It also has tremendous explanatory power for things that an atheistic viewpoint does not, such as the origin of the universe, the origin of life, morality, beauty.
Evolution can explain all of these except for the origin of the universe, which theism equally fails at. It merely creates a new question, where did God come from? If you choose to say he is eternal, then I can just as easily say the same of the universe.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News