Started By
Message

What luxury position would you like Saints to splurge a pick on?

Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:17 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166531 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:17 pm
QB
RB (although not very luxurious)
FB
TE
OT
DE
S
P

Only positions I'd allow for discussion
This post was edited on 4/12/14 at 7:23 pm
Posted by blueslover
deeper than deep south
Member since Sep 2007
22792 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:20 pm to
Kicker in the 6th if rated better than Graham
Posted by BlacknGold
He Hate Me
Member since Mar 2009
12054 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Only positions I'd allow for discussion


and blues instantly goes off the board. but i agree, a kicker would be nice if they like one.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64501 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:22 pm to
TE

We are well stocked but depth may be a good thing going forward
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16324 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:51 pm to
DE.

Never can have too many pass rushers.

And I wouldnt say taking an OT would be a luxury pick.
Posted by Melvin
Member since Apr 2011
23535 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:55 pm to
Rb if it's Jeremy Hill. I'm biased and I know it.
Posted by HollierThanThou
Member since Jan 2012
6209 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 3:14 pm to
OG obviously

Grubs and Evans are older and more expensive than ever. Getting younger and cheaper may not be an immediate need but it needs to be addressed in the near future.
Posted by hugo_boss
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2012
990 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 3:28 pm to
I wouldn't be displeased if the Saints took FB Trey Millard in the 5th or later. I think he can make plays at the FB position and is a good blocker.
Posted by Dats Who
Down the road
Member since Nov 2012
482 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 5:31 pm to
RB: D. Thomas or D. Archer

Half because I think either would be good enough to fill Sproles' shoes

And the other half just so Cadet is expendable, and Lester eats some crow
Posted by MISSIPSAINT
Magee
Member since Feb 2013
438 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 5:33 pm to
Splurge is not an option.
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 4/13/14 at 7:38 am to
Luxury, as not necessarily a pressing need?

I'd say RB and TE.

I agree with Blues on a K late in the draft.

Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:56 pm to
I look at a splurge as a position that won't be missing a starter or key role player(someone playing at least half the snaps) for at least 2 years.

That would be:
QB(Brees at least 3 more years)
HB(Thomas and Robinson at least 3 more years)
FB(Freshly signed Lorig for at least 3 years)
TE(assuming Graham is signed long term, and we should have Hill for at least 3 more years)
OT(Strief and Armstead for at least 3 years)
S(Byrd, Vaccaro, and Ball for at least 3 more years)
P(Come on son. The Leg.)

So the same as your list Chad, except for DE because of the fact that Jordan, Galette, Hicks, and Walker could all be UFAs after the 2015 season, and Foster would be a RFA after 2015. That's everyone we have that plays from a DE spot.

More than likely we lock Jordan up long term at one spot after the 2015 season, but that still leaves the other spot in question.

I don't see them letting Galette and Hicks get away, and I think there's a good chance we can keep both(Galette will be harder to retain, especially if he hits 12 sacks this year). And Hicks has been playing more DT in a 4 man front.

So it would be smart to take a DE if one with good value falls.

Now out of all of the splurge positions, I like the idea of taking a HB most, followed by QB.

Thomas is getting older and Ingram will be an UFA after this season. That would leave us with just one young back in Robinson.

QB would have to be a very good value pick early(to give us options), but not a bad move late. I think Griffin showed just as much in his rookie year as Daniel did in his last year here, but that was still mediocre. I like the potential but that's all Griffin is at the moment.

At TE, I think they really like Hill, but we could do better for after Watson leaves(after 2015). So it's not really immediate, but if a good one falls, especially a blocking type, take him.

OT would be for depth only(Harris could be upgraded and Jones, while I like his size, has shown nothing so far). FB, S, and P would be completely useless(unless there is some beastly FB I haven't heard about).
This post was edited on 4/13/14 at 1:00 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram