- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What luxury position would you like Saints to splurge a pick on?
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:17 pm
QB
RB (although not very luxurious)
FB
TE
OT
DE
S
P
Only positions I'd allow for discussion
RB (although not very luxurious)
FB
TE
OT
DE
S
P
Only positions I'd allow for discussion
This post was edited on 4/12/14 at 7:23 pm
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:20 pm to Chad504boy
Kicker in the 6th if rated better than Graham
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:22 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Only positions I'd allow for discussion
and blues instantly goes off the board. but i agree, a kicker would be nice if they like one.
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:22 pm to Chad504boy
TE
We are well stocked but depth may be a good thing going forward
We are well stocked but depth may be a good thing going forward
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:51 pm to Chad504boy
DE.
Never can have too many pass rushers.
And I wouldnt say taking an OT would be a luxury pick.
Never can have too many pass rushers.
And I wouldnt say taking an OT would be a luxury pick.
Posted on 4/12/14 at 2:55 pm to Chad504boy
Rb if it's Jeremy Hill. I'm biased and I know it.
Posted on 4/12/14 at 3:14 pm to Chad504boy
OG obviously
Grubs and Evans are older and more expensive than ever. Getting younger and cheaper may not be an immediate need but it needs to be addressed in the near future.
Grubs and Evans are older and more expensive than ever. Getting younger and cheaper may not be an immediate need but it needs to be addressed in the near future.
Posted on 4/12/14 at 3:28 pm to Chad504boy
I wouldn't be displeased if the Saints took FB Trey Millard in the 5th or later. I think he can make plays at the FB position and is a good blocker.
Posted on 4/12/14 at 5:31 pm to Chad504boy
RB: D. Thomas or D. Archer
Half because I think either would be good enough to fill Sproles' shoes
And the other half just so Cadet is expendable, and Lester eats some crow
Half because I think either would be good enough to fill Sproles' shoes
And the other half just so Cadet is expendable, and Lester eats some crow
Posted on 4/12/14 at 5:33 pm to Chad504boy
Splurge is not an option.
Posted on 4/13/14 at 7:38 am to Chad504boy
Luxury, as not necessarily a pressing need?
I'd say RB and TE.
I agree with Blues on a K late in the draft.
I'd say RB and TE.
I agree with Blues on a K late in the draft.
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:56 pm to Chad504boy
I look at a splurge as a position that won't be missing a starter or key role player(someone playing at least half the snaps) for at least 2 years.
That would be:
QB(Brees at least 3 more years)
HB(Thomas and Robinson at least 3 more years)
FB(Freshly signed Lorig for at least 3 years)
TE(assuming Graham is signed long term, and we should have Hill for at least 3 more years)
OT(Strief and Armstead for at least 3 years)
S(Byrd, Vaccaro, and Ball for at least 3 more years)
P(Come on son. The Leg.)
So the same as your list Chad, except for DE because of the fact that Jordan, Galette, Hicks, and Walker could all be UFAs after the 2015 season, and Foster would be a RFA after 2015. That's everyone we have that plays from a DE spot.
More than likely we lock Jordan up long term at one spot after the 2015 season, but that still leaves the other spot in question.
I don't see them letting Galette and Hicks get away, and I think there's a good chance we can keep both(Galette will be harder to retain, especially if he hits 12 sacks this year). And Hicks has been playing more DT in a 4 man front.
So it would be smart to take a DE if one with good value falls.
Now out of all of the splurge positions, I like the idea of taking a HB most, followed by QB.
Thomas is getting older and Ingram will be an UFA after this season. That would leave us with just one young back in Robinson.
QB would have to be a very good value pick early(to give us options), but not a bad move late. I think Griffin showed just as much in his rookie year as Daniel did in his last year here, but that was still mediocre. I like the potential but that's all Griffin is at the moment.
At TE, I think they really like Hill, but we could do better for after Watson leaves(after 2015). So it's not really immediate, but if a good one falls, especially a blocking type, take him.
OT would be for depth only(Harris could be upgraded and Jones, while I like his size, has shown nothing so far). FB, S, and P would be completely useless(unless there is some beastly FB I haven't heard about).
That would be:
QB(Brees at least 3 more years)
HB(Thomas and Robinson at least 3 more years)
FB(Freshly signed Lorig for at least 3 years)
TE(assuming Graham is signed long term, and we should have Hill for at least 3 more years)
OT(Strief and Armstead for at least 3 years)
S(Byrd, Vaccaro, and Ball for at least 3 more years)
P(Come on son. The Leg.)
So the same as your list Chad, except for DE because of the fact that Jordan, Galette, Hicks, and Walker could all be UFAs after the 2015 season, and Foster would be a RFA after 2015. That's everyone we have that plays from a DE spot.
More than likely we lock Jordan up long term at one spot after the 2015 season, but that still leaves the other spot in question.
I don't see them letting Galette and Hicks get away, and I think there's a good chance we can keep both(Galette will be harder to retain, especially if he hits 12 sacks this year). And Hicks has been playing more DT in a 4 man front.
So it would be smart to take a DE if one with good value falls.
Now out of all of the splurge positions, I like the idea of taking a HB most, followed by QB.
Thomas is getting older and Ingram will be an UFA after this season. That would leave us with just one young back in Robinson.
QB would have to be a very good value pick early(to give us options), but not a bad move late. I think Griffin showed just as much in his rookie year as Daniel did in his last year here, but that was still mediocre. I like the potential but that's all Griffin is at the moment.
At TE, I think they really like Hill, but we could do better for after Watson leaves(after 2015). So it's not really immediate, but if a good one falls, especially a blocking type, take him.
OT would be for depth only(Harris could be upgraded and Jones, while I like his size, has shown nothing so far). FB, S, and P would be completely useless(unless there is some beastly FB I haven't heard about).
This post was edited on 4/13/14 at 1:00 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News