Started By
Message

re: Star Trek into Darkness: Discussion and SPOILERS thread

Posted on 5/17/13 at 9:48 pm to
Posted by cigsmcgee
LR
Member since May 2012
5233 posts
Posted on 5/17/13 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

Especially liked the death scene, with it's symmetry to the original (the words for the call from engineering was the same).

And while the dialogue was meh in places....I really really liked that conversation. And the actors both did a great job with it.


completely agree. once it was clear they were going in that direction, i was getting ready to turn against the whole movie, but it was played extremely well imo, and won me over. not what i would have done as a follow up to a reboot, at all, but was done competently.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 5/17/13 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

To gain control of a Klingon vessel because they are the most powerful outside of Starfleet is my guess. Also he thought it was the only place in the known universe they couldn't come to try and get him.


I'm pretty sure he wanted them to come and get him.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
478296 posts
Posted on 5/17/13 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

What was Khan's motivation basically at any stage? I get the attacking the "archives" so he can attack the Admiral, but then why beam to Kronos? Is his plan to start a war between Starfleet and the Klingon Empire? If so, why not let them get caught?

he needed to give starfleet a reason to use the torpedos, so he could work an angle to get his crew

he knew they would use those torpedos due to the klingon threat
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59626 posts
Posted on 5/17/13 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

1. When did Spock turn into a fricking action hero? The cold, logical Vulcan is leaping to moving platforms and become an action hero? This is the same guy who just sits in the volcano like the monk who set himself on fire? 2. Why are they hiding the ship in the fricking ocean? Shouldn't it be displacing a massive amount of water in that bay? ETA: this is fricking stupid on my part This is something we've never seen a Starfleet ship do when observing a planet, because it's dumb, but what was the motivation? 


1. Spock was always capable of action-heroism. Check out pretty much any episode of the original series.

2. I think you are comparing their tech and experience to the TNG/DS9 experience and tech.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 12:26 am to
Oh, and by the way, for those of you that can't accept the changes like Ace, you'll hate it. For those of you who like Star Wars, this more or less should have been Episode II.
Posted by tidehillcrest
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
1521 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 1:27 am to
Well if you PAID attention you know its post-Vulcan gone bye-bye so his half human side is pushing his emotions so hes obviously doing things Spock Prime would never do.
Posted by tidehillcrest
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
1521 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 1:34 am to
There sure were a LOT of Star Trek VI The Undiscovered Country references the film. Also anyone catch the USS Vengeance's hatch number 101A from the destruct sequence in Trek 3? And McCoy talking to Sulu about never pissing him off...as the security officer did in Trek 3. And Kirk telling Spock he'd miss him as McCoy saying the same thing to Spock in Trek 3.
Posted by tidehillcrest
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
1521 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 1:36 am to
I agree completely..better than I thought it would be...BUT..they could have tweaked the final 90 seconds of the film for a more emotional impact rather than a copy of the previous film's ending.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:18 am to
quote:

How was the freefall to the Moon, since that struck me as a scene that would look incredible in IMAX?


The most incredible scenes in IMAX 3D were:

1. Opening scene running through the forest and the volcano both looked unreal

2. The shotput scene where Kahn and Kirk were flying through space trying to reach the other vessel. It looked badass.
Posted by Chill Pill
Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Member since May 2009
635 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 8:38 am to
Although I enjoyed the film, here are my problems with the plot.

1. This film opens in the 23rd century -- I think if I remember in 2259. If Kahn and his people are 300 years old, they would have had to have been "genetically engineered" in the mid to late 1900's. How in the frick does a 300 year old guy possess the kind of intelligence to design ships and weapons systems appropriate for the 23rd century? And how in the world could a late 20th century Earth have dispatched Kahn and his people into deep space? Which brings me to my next question ...

2. This dude is friggin Superman. 23rd century warriors and people with 23rd century technology can't stop ONE DUDE. Multiply Kahn by 72 (his comrades) -- how the frick could 20th century Earth have stopped them?

3. Marcus has built the biggest, baddest ship ever. And no one knows? This is the most massive coverup and act of treason in history and no one knows?

4. Scotty can immobilize Kahn with 1 stun but it takes Uhura 20 shots before Khan goes down?

5. Scotty can just sneak aboard the Dreadnaught and no one knows? The most lethal ship in the universe and anyone flying by can waltz in?

6. Someone mentioned this before but you beam a 90 pound babe onto a moving platform to assist in the fight against Khan?

7. I was ok with the homage to STII, but the scream at the end reminded me more of Darth Vader's "Nooooooooooooo!"
This post was edited on 5/18/13 at 8:53 am
Posted by sbr2
Member since Apr 2011
15425 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 9:22 am to
quote:

1. This film opens in the 23rd century -- I think if I remember in 2259. If Kahn and his people are 300 years old, they would have had to have been "genetically engineered" in the mid to late 1900's. How in the frick does a 300 year old guy possess the kind of intelligence to design ships and weapons systems appropriate for the 23rd century? And how in the world could a late 20th century Earth have dispatched Kahn and his people into deep space? Which brings me to my next question ...


He's hyper intelligent - he was given a year to adapt to modern technology. When he was frozen Khan was working with 20th century technology and the entire world would have been against his schemes.

quote:

2. This dude is friggin Superman. 23rd century warriors and people with 23rd century technology can't stop ONE DUDE. Multiply Kahn by 72 (his comrades) -- how the frick could 20th century Earth have stopped them?


As I previously postulated, the entire world probably worked to get rid of the superhuman threat.

quote:

3. Marcus has built the biggest, baddest ship ever. And no one knows? This is the most massive coverup and act of treason in history and no one knows?


No idea, all the starfleet commanders thought the lab was an archive - so it's not impossible that the secret group managed to conceal this.

quote:

4. Scotty can immobilize Kahn with 1 stun but it takes Uhura 20 shots before Khan goes down?


Seemed like he was playing coy

quote:

5. Scotty can just sneak aboard the Dreadnaught and no one knows? The most lethal ship in the universe and anyone flying by can waltz in?


This is an issue, where are the credential checks

quote:

6. Someone mentioned this before but you beam a 90 pound babe onto a moving platform to assist in the fight against Khan?


No idea, transporter consistency is a mess in this movie.

Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84964 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 9:58 am to
I loved the movie. Thoughts:

1. It was a plot fail to beam Uhura to help Spock rather than a soldier or a few soldiers with good weapons. Oh well.

2. I was surprised the whole "letting the cavemen see a starship" issue didn't amount to anything more than another rule that Kirk broke. Very cool scene byw.

3. Didn't like how Spock could go toe to toe with Khan.

4. The whole movie I was waiting for the Klingons to retaliate. Their complete absence was baffling.

5. The starship crashing into the city was one of the baddest arse scenes I've ever scene in a movie. The sheer scale of the ship was incredible.

And...

Can Klingons beat up Romulans?
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53519 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 10:34 am to
quote:

2. I was surprised the whole "letting the cavemen see a starship" issue didn't amount to anything more than another rule that Kirk broke. Very cool scene byw.


I was confused by this.

So they were surveying the planet and found the population at risk and decided to help.

But why again was Kirk and McCoy on the ground, and why was he stealing a religious artifact?
Posted by Chill Pill
Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Member since May 2009
635 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 10:52 am to
I think Kirk and McCoy were supposed to be a divergence and distract the natives away from where Spock was. That's why Kirk stole the artifact because that would ensure that the natives would chase them. Why this was needed since was in a friggin volcano is beyond me.
Posted by Chill Pill
Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Member since May 2009
635 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Didn't like how Spock could go toe to toe with Khan.


Me too. Khan can take a beating from Kirk and not blink, can survive a starship crashing into a friggin city but Spock can break his arm.

And Spock took a beating too. Where was the green blood? That would've been awesome seeing Spock with green blood smeared all over him.
Posted by sbr2
Member since Apr 2011
15425 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 10:59 am to
I dunno, I mean Spock kicks Kirks arse in this universe. It would make sense that he would be a better fighter, but enough to take out a superhuman? I guess he was weak from surviving the rough descent and crash.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74380 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 11:05 am to
I haven't seen the movie yet, but I like to be spoiled (crazy I know)

Anyway.
I'm a trekkie, so let me give some back info


1990'2 -2000's there was a war, where Khan seized south Asia and began making supermen called the Eugenics wars. The idea was to purge the earth of the impure. This is a hazy area, as much of Trek doesn't talk about it, because the idea came in the 60's and we are years past when the wars should have happened.

The wars led to ww3, with most of the US being destroyed. (except for the midwest, New Orleans and San Francisco and the badlands)

It unsure who the antagonists were but likely asians vs the west.

Anyway. You have first contact with the Vulcans in 2165. For a hundred years they help us advance, all while limiting us, as the other races realize humans adapt faster to technology than any other race. The nations of the world form alliances and unions, eventually leading to the creation of United Earth.
By 2260 we have deep space Warp 5 exploration vehicles. We are seen as a threat to some races, notably the Xindi, who decide to launch an attack on earth. They destroy Florida. This leads to United Earth requesting an alliance with the Vulcans, the Andorrans and the Tellurites. The new alliance is called the Federation of Planets, and since Earth is central, it is the capital world of the new Federation. With the political HQ in Paris and the military HQ in San Francisco.


The Romulan Star Empire hears of this and sees a threat, they start launching computer viruses against our ships, which cause the crews to lose control, and have their ships turn on each other. This leads to Star Fleet adopting an earlier technology, and explains why the TOS ships are less advanced then the ships a hundred years before that.

Establishment of the neutral zone brings relative peace with the Romulans and later the Klingons, and we all go on our way.

The only rule is, no Federation ship may have cloaking technology.
The Klingons, are more like a middle eastern nation, with a weak central leadership and tribal attitudes.
Meaning they kind of do what they want.
Romulans are more ordered, but only attack if it is logical.

The Romulan attack on earth in the first movie was not condoned by the Romulan Star Empire, that was the work of Nero. Who does beat up at least 7 Klingons in the deleted scenes from the first movie. deleted scene with Nero and Klingons


This world from here on out is different, while at the same time the Prime world has already happened. In Spock Prime's mind, Captain Picard retired, Data is captain of the enterprise, and everything that happened on TV or the movies did happen.

While at the same time everything is different.


Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84964 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 11:12 am to
Fascinating. Thank you for that history.
Posted by Dodgson
Member since Feb 2012
722 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 11:20 am to
I don't think a lot of people here are familiar with the nature of Vulcans. Their very nature is one of restraint. They are capable of expressing extreme emotions beyond anything humans can comprehend, which is why they suppress them. They are very strong (much stronger than the average human), but do not resort to violence unless necessary.

Strong enough to take out Kahn? Who knows. But I'd take an enraged Spock over Kirk any day. Kirk would be ground beef by the time it was over with.
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10681 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 11:34 am to
quote:

But why again was Kirk and McCoy on the ground, and why was he stealing a religious artifact?


To lure them away from the volcano (specifically, closer to water) if their mission failed and it did erupt.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram