- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Which schools surprise you having low recuriting rankings
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:31 pm
Which schools surprise you for having such low recruiting rankings?
Using Rivals rankings:
Georgia Tech - #85
Stanford - #63
Kansas State - #62
All kind of head-scratchers for me.
Using Rivals rankings:
Georgia Tech - #85
Stanford - #63
Kansas State - #62
All kind of head-scratchers for me.
This post was edited on 2/6/13 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:34 pm to LSUbase13
Surprised Stanford isn't more desirable. Beautiful area, great coach, great degree, pro system.
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:36 pm to LSUbase13
The entire ACC minus Clemson/VT
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:36 pm to LSUbase13
#1 has to be Texas. Yeah they sucked, but they're TEXAS. They have the easiest recruiting road in the nation.
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:40 pm to LSUbase13
Stanford took a really small class. They are loaded with upperclassmen.
They will be back up there next year.
They will be back up there next year.
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:47 pm to LSUbase13
Miami is #44 on Rivals right now. That's crazy.
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:49 pm to LSUbase13
quote:
Kansas State - #62
This shouldn't surprise any one.
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:49 pm to LSUbase13
Stanford had a big time class last year so that surprises but the other two make sense.
Mizzou is still recruiting like they're in the Big XII. They're 20 spots behind fricking Kentucky.
Mizzou is still recruiting like they're in the Big XII. They're 20 spots behind fricking Kentucky.
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:50 pm to LSUbase13
Doesn't really surprise me, and I guess it's not a low ranking, but UGA should do better than #12. Especially this year. 9 of the top 100 players in the '13 class are from the state of Georgia, but only 2 (!) signed with UGA. So much for putting a fence around the state!
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:53 pm to LSUbase13
quote:
Kansas State - #62
Not really that surprising. They've always won by bringing in JUCOs and developing under-recruited talent.
Texas is an obvious one, but NIU is interesting to me. MAC teams rarely rank high nationally, but with the Orange Bowl appearance and Illinois being down, they didn't even do much compared to the rest of their conference.
Posted on 2/6/13 at 5:10 pm to LSUbase13
quote:
Stanford - #3
Misleading stat. They have a very small class which hurts their average/points total. If you go by average star rating, they are around 15.
Posted on 2/6/13 at 5:33 pm to LSUbase13
ULM-123(I believe)
Some may laugh but with all the attention they got this past season u figured they could crack the top 100
Some may laugh but with all the attention they got this past season u figured they could crack the top 100
Posted on 2/6/13 at 6:27 pm to LSUbase13
quote:
Georgia Tech - #85
Stanford - #63
Strong academic universities.
quote:
Kansas State - #62
In the middle of nowhere. Seriously, who wants to go to Manhattan, Kansas.
quote:
All kind of head-scratchers for me.
Not really. Tech hasn't been that great in a while, so it is no surprise that they don't recruit well.
Stanford and KState have been doing amazing things with low level talent. If you've watched either team play the past 3 years you would have heard some announcer slobbering over this fact at least once.
Posted on 2/6/13 at 10:09 pm to LSUbase13
For Texas to be #23 on both Scout and Rivals is truly ridiculous.
You have to consciously recruit against yourself to pull that off.
You have to consciously recruit against yourself to pull that off.
Posted on 2/7/13 at 9:04 am to LSUbase13
It's pretty crazy how random results on the field translate from recuriting rankings, espescially outside of the top 10 or so.
Take TCU in 2006, as class that included 5 current NFL players:
Marcus Cannon (NE) 3*, Andy Dalton (Cinci) 3*, Jerry Hughes (Indy) 2*, Colin Jones (carolina) 3*, Marshall Newhouse (GB) 2*.
That class was ranked 60th by Rivals.
The 2007 Boise St. class ranked 68th by Rivals included 7 current NFL Players:
Doug Martin (TB) 2*, Kellen Moore (Det) 3*, Shea McClellin (Chi) 2*, Austin Pettis (St.L) 3*, Nate Potter (Ariz) 2*, Billy Winn (Cle) 3*, Titus Young (Det) 3*
Take TCU in 2006, as class that included 5 current NFL players:
Marcus Cannon (NE) 3*, Andy Dalton (Cinci) 3*, Jerry Hughes (Indy) 2*, Colin Jones (carolina) 3*, Marshall Newhouse (GB) 2*.
That class was ranked 60th by Rivals.
The 2007 Boise St. class ranked 68th by Rivals included 7 current NFL Players:
Doug Martin (TB) 2*, Kellen Moore (Det) 3*, Shea McClellin (Chi) 2*, Austin Pettis (St.L) 3*, Nate Potter (Ariz) 2*, Billy Winn (Cle) 3*, Titus Young (Det) 3*
Posted on 2/7/13 at 10:09 am to LSUbase13
quote:
Georgia Tech - #85
I can't remember the last time GT had a good class so to say it surprises me doesn't really make sense. Our brand just doesn't sell anymore. GT is in the heart of SEC territory and when you combine that with the limitations the schools puts on itself, just isn't appealing.
UGA did pretty terrible considering how loaded the state of GA was this year. Their class is good but it could have been great.
Posted on 2/7/13 at 10:57 am to LSUbase13
Stanfurd cuz ESPN told me David Shaw was an awesome top 10 recruiter
Posted on 2/7/13 at 11:19 am to LSUbase13
Kansas state builds their program very heavily with juco prospects. Kansas has some of the best juco football in the country, so it works for them.
This post was edited on 2/7/13 at 11:20 am
Posted on 2/7/13 at 1:28 pm to LSUbase13
Mizzou so much for the SEC bump for them
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News