Started By
Message
locked post

Which schools surprise you having low recuriting rankings

Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:31 pm
Posted by LSUbase13
Mt. Pleasant, SC
Member since Mar 2008
15060 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:31 pm
Which schools surprise you for having such low recruiting rankings?

Using Rivals rankings:

Georgia Tech - #85
Stanford - #63
Kansas State - #62

All kind of head-scratchers for me.
This post was edited on 2/6/13 at 4:32 pm
Posted by geauxtigers585
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
3832 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:33 pm to
Why does GT surprise you?
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64373 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:34 pm to
Surprised Stanford isn't more desirable. Beautiful area, great coach, great degree, pro system.
Posted by TheOcean
#honeyfriedchicken
Member since Aug 2004
42544 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:36 pm to
The entire ACC minus Clemson/VT
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60546 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:36 pm to
#1 has to be Texas. Yeah they sucked, but they're TEXAS. They have the easiest recruiting road in the nation.
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40951 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:40 pm to
Stanford took a really small class. They are loaded with upperclassmen.

They will be back up there next year.
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:47 pm to
Miami is #44 on Rivals right now. That's crazy.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39607 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Kansas State - #62


This shouldn't surprise any one.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71788 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:49 pm to
Stanford had a big time class last year so that surprises but the other two make sense.

Mizzou is still recruiting like they're in the Big XII. They're 20 spots behind fricking Kentucky.
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:50 pm to
Doesn't really surprise me, and I guess it's not a low ranking, but UGA should do better than #12. Especially this year. 9 of the top 100 players in the '13 class are from the state of Georgia, but only 2 (!) signed with UGA. So much for putting a fence around the state!
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
15928 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

Kansas State - #62

Not really that surprising. They've always won by bringing in JUCOs and developing under-recruited talent.

Texas is an obvious one, but NIU is interesting to me. MAC teams rarely rank high nationally, but with the Orange Bowl appearance and Illinois being down, they didn't even do much compared to the rest of their conference.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34488 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

Stanford - #3


Misleading stat. They have a very small class which hurts their average/points total. If you go by average star rating, they are around 15.
Posted by YMCA
It's Fun to Stay
Member since May 2011
3946 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 5:33 pm to
ULM-123(I believe)

Some may laugh but with all the attention they got this past season u figured they could crack the top 100
Posted by GeauxWarTigers
Auburn
Member since Oct 2010
18046 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Georgia Tech - #85
Stanford - #63


Strong academic universities.

quote:

Kansas State - #62


In the middle of nowhere. Seriously, who wants to go to Manhattan, Kansas.

quote:

All kind of head-scratchers for me.


Not really. Tech hasn't been that great in a while, so it is no surprise that they don't recruit well.

Stanford and KState have been doing amazing things with low level talent. If you've watched either team play the past 3 years you would have heard some announcer slobbering over this fact at least once.
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
13985 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 10:09 pm to
For Texas to be #23 on both Scout and Rivals is truly ridiculous.

You have to consciously recruit against yourself to pull that off.
Posted by Vlad The Inhaler
Moose Jaw, SK
Member since Sep 2008
3160 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 9:04 am to
It's pretty crazy how random results on the field translate from recuriting rankings, espescially outside of the top 10 or so.

Take TCU in 2006, as class that included 5 current NFL players:

Marcus Cannon (NE) 3*, Andy Dalton (Cinci) 3*, Jerry Hughes (Indy) 2*, Colin Jones (carolina) 3*, Marshall Newhouse (GB) 2*.

That class was ranked 60th by Rivals.

The 2007 Boise St. class ranked 68th by Rivals included 7 current NFL Players:

Doug Martin (TB) 2*, Kellen Moore (Det) 3*, Shea McClellin (Chi) 2*, Austin Pettis (St.L) 3*, Nate Potter (Ariz) 2*, Billy Winn (Cle) 3*, Titus Young (Det) 3*
Posted by hiltacular
NYC
Member since Jan 2011
19689 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Georgia Tech - #85


I can't remember the last time GT had a good class so to say it surprises me doesn't really make sense. Our brand just doesn't sell anymore. GT is in the heart of SEC territory and when you combine that with the limitations the schools puts on itself, just isn't appealing.

UGA did pretty terrible considering how loaded the state of GA was this year. Their class is good but it could have been great.
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44582 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 10:57 am to
Stanfurd cuz ESPN told me David Shaw was an awesome top 10 recruiter
Posted by stevo1905
Member since Nov 2010
2082 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 11:19 am to
Kansas state builds their program very heavily with juco prospects. Kansas has some of the best juco football in the country, so it works for them.
This post was edited on 2/7/13 at 11:20 am
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125465 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 1:28 pm to
Mizzou so much for the SEC bump for them
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram