- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mickelson on Taxes...
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:26 am
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:26 am
LINK
I dont blame him on looking to make some changes. But I think he overreacted a bit. Simply moving out of California would save an incredible tax burden. I dont understand why he would consider semi-retirement.
I know California is home but you can move back when your playing days are over....
I dont blame him on looking to make some changes. But I think he overreacted a bit. Simply moving out of California would save an incredible tax burden. I dont understand why he would consider semi-retirement.
I know California is home but you can move back when your playing days are over....
This post was edited on 1/22/13 at 9:27 am
13
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:29 am to cjared036
Seriously, so many PGA guys live in Florida or at least "domicile" there for tax purposes. Keep a house in CA and your "home" in FL.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:29 am to cjared036
While I don't necessary agree with him, he shouldn't have apologized.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:29 am to cjared036
Why would any golfer live anywhere other than Texas or Florida?
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:30 am to cjared036
quote:
Simply moving out of California would save an incredible tax burden
The hell it wouldn't
You get slaughtered in CA with taxes
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:31 am to cjared036
He shouldn't apologize for speaking the truth. If I made that kind of money in a year youd bet your arse I'd live in a place with the least amount of tax burdens.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:32 am to cjared036
One of his major sponsors is KPMG, an accounting firm. There's no way in the world he's paying more than 17%.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:33 am to tigerbaittrick
I think some people griped about how he complained. It had a "poor me" attitude.
His CPA must be dumb.
Keep your personal business to yourself.
His CPA must be dumb.
Keep your personal business to yourself.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:33 am to cjared036
I don't see why he needed to apologize. I can imagine that taxes in California, when combined with federal, is just a ludicrous amount of money going to the government.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:34 am to Commandeaux
quote:
One of his major sponsors is KPMG, an accounting firm. There's no way in the world he's paying more than 17%.
You are just stupid.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:35 am to cjared036
California will tax him at 13.3% for 2013. Is it foolish to think about reducing, or eliminating, $8 million in incoome taxes? And that doesn't include sales taxes, which were also increased in California.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:35 am to cjared036
I just saw on CNBC that he is probably paying closer to 50% after deductions, lower than the 65% he complained about.
But I agree I bet he is paying much less than 50%.
But I agree I bet he is paying much less than 50%.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:35 am to cjared036
I just saw on CNBC that he is probably paying closer to 50% after deductions, lower than the 65% he complained about.
But I agree I bet he is paying much less than 50%.
But I agree I bet he is paying much less than 50%.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:35 am to cjared036
I just saw on CNBC that he is probably paying closer to 50% after deductions, lower than the 65% he complained about.
But I agree I bet he is paying much less than 50%.
But I agree I bet he is paying much less than 50%.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:36 am to cjared036
quote:
But I agree I bet he is paying much less than 50%.
How so? His earnings are taxed by the state for which he earns them in...
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:37 am to cjared036
I just saw on CNBC that he is probably paying closer to 50% after deductions, lower than the 65% he complained about.
But I agree I bet he is paying much less than 50%.
But I agree I bet he is paying much less than 50%.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:39 am to Golfer
quote:
You are just stupid.
I stand by my statement. You show me someone in the 39% tax bracket actually paying 39% and I'll ban myself.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:40 am to cjared036
Creditors can't take your house in FL because of the homestead exemption. Worldcom's Scott Sullivan was building a $40 million house on the water in Boca to insulate his money from creditors when he got snapped off by the Feds. 
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:40 am to cjared036
quote:
I just saw on CNBC that he is probably paying closer to 50% after deductions, lower than the 65% he complained about.
But I agree I bet he is paying much less than 50%.
we get it
Posted on 1/22/13 at 9:41 am to cjared036
Good for him. Why should he apologize for that?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News