- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Biden: W.H. readies 19 executive actions on guns
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:26 pm
LINK
Those AR prices may go up yet. fricking ridiculous if they pull this off
Those AR prices may go up yet. fricking ridiculous if they pull this off
This post was edited on 1/14/13 at 8:28 pm
12
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:30 pm to SW2SCLA
But wat about the thread today saying it would never happen! Im so confused
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:32 pm to SW2SCLA
quote:
“I urged him to do as much by executive order as possible,” she said. “Frankly, I don’t have a lot of confidence that this Congress is going to do anything significant.”
What a bunch of ducking communists.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:34 pm to oleyeller
Later this week, Obama will formally announce his proposals to reduce gun violence, which are expected to include renewal of the assault weapons ban, universal background checks and prohibition of high-capacity magazine clips.
eta; quoted...
eta; quoted...
This post was edited on 1/14/13 at 8:35 pm
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:34 pm to SW2SCLA
Let me see if I got this right. A State can override Federal Law on marijuana sales which is not Constutionally protected. However, a State can't override Federal Law on Firearms sales which is Constutionally protected?
There is no policeman in Baton Rouge that will enforce that. It's a joke.
There is no policeman in Baton Rouge that will enforce that. It's a joke.
This post was edited on 1/14/13 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:35 pm to oleyeller
quote:
But wat about the thread today saying it would never happen! Im so confused
I'll repeat my first thought when I read that thread, "What do you expect the NRA to say?" I hope they're right, but they are a biased source.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:35 pm to SW2SCLA
Texas Congressman Threatens Impeachment Filing if Obama Uses Executive Order for Gun Control
quote:
Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman said on Monday that impeachment filings wouldn’t be out of the question if President Obama was to try and institute new gun control policies through executive order, which can bypass Congress to an extent.
“I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary, including but not limited to eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment,” Stockman said in a statement.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:36 pm to oleyeller
That link says afull ban is unlikely.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:36 pm to wickowick
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:50 pm to El Josey Wales
Honestly, possibly broadening the defintion of someone who is mentally unstable is the most frightening to me. I work in mental health. They pass that restriction first and then gradually expand what that definition is. Imagine if anyone who has ever been prescribed an antidepressant, or adderall or vyvanse, is ruled mentally unstable by their definition. How many people do you know that would be in that category? I know I know dozens, and they are all responsible gun owners. I'm no tin-foil-hat-wearer, conspiracy junkie, but this seems pretty feasible for this administration IMO.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:51 pm to wickowick
quote:
Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman said on Monday that impeachment filings wouldn’t be out of the question if President Obama was to try and institute new gun control policies through executive order, which can bypass Congress to an extent.
“I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary, including but not limited to eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment,” Stockman said in a statement.
Should I buy land in Texas now in case they file for secession?
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:53 pm to SW2SCLA
I expect them to go even further than that. It will eventually just be anyone who disagrees with them is mentally unstable.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:55 pm to SW2SCLA
Got two spikes tactical and one ds arms lowers this weekend. For a decent price. 
Only need one
Only need one
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:56 pm to DrTyger
quote:
I expect them to go even further than that. It will eventually just be anyone who disagrees with them is mentally unstable.
You're a couple of steps ahead of me. I honestly don't think it will go that far.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:57 pm to DrTyger
They could start convicting people with illegal weapons and not letting them off so easy. Then start cracking down on the gun "black" market (instead of participating in it).
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:58 pm to SW2SCLA
so much for the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Hello dicktater Obama. Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:58 pm to SW2SCLA
quote:
How many people do you know that would be in that category? I know I know dozens, and they are all responsible gun owners
I know 2 very well.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 9:01 pm to SW2SCLA
quote:
Honestly, possibly broadening the defintion of someone who is mentally unstable is the most frightening to me. I work in mental health. They pass that restriction first and then gradually expand what that definition is. Imagine if anyone who has ever been prescribed an antidepressant, or adderall or vyvanse, is ruled mentally unstable by their definition. How many people do you know that would be in that category? I know I know dozens, and they are all responsible gun owners. I'm no tin-foil-hat-wearer, conspiracy junkie, but this seems pretty feasible for this administration IMO.
If they don't let them have guns they shouldn't let them drive either. Cars are far more dangerous.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 9:06 pm to SW2SCLA
I. fricking. Hate. Biden.
Eta:
Eta:
This post was edited on 1/14/13 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 1/14/13 at 9:10 pm to SW2SCLA
quote:
I'll repeat my first thought when I read that thread, "What do you expect the NRA to say?" I hope they're right, but they are a biased source.
Agree. The NRA said they didn't think a ban would make it through Congress. That's all. If I recall correctly, a lot of Democrats lost their jobs after the 1995-2005 ban which may or may not have given the Republicans a majority in Congress. Democrats will never give up efforts to ban armed citizenry. It's as reflexive to them as Republican"s efforts to ban abortion.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News