- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Since when do you start calling penalties on intent?
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:32 am
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:32 am
I admit that call was a crappy call last night. He barely grazed the wide receiver. Yet somehow, the intent was there? Is that like Miles, with having the want to hurt someone or do something? I personally think it was a makeup call, for not calling the roughing the passer a little earlier. And yes i did not search if already posted.
This post was edited on 10/14/12 at 10:34 am
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:32 am to lsutigerfan1976
SEC officiating.
SEC football meets Minority Report.
SEC football meets Minority Report.
This post was edited on 10/14/12 at 10:33 am
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:34 am to lsutigerfan1976
That call made no sense
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:37 am to lsutigerfan1976
There is no rule, to my knowledge, which states that if a player misses a tackle, but had INTENT to lead with his helmet, it's a personal foul.
As I said in another post, if we apply rules to intent, we should be able to apply it to the fair catch no call. ODB INTENDED to call a fair catch.
As I said in another post, if we apply rules to intent, we should be able to apply it to the fair catch no call. ODB INTENDED to call a fair catch.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:37 am to lsutigerfan1976
If you admit he grazed him plus they were out of bounds plus he was leading with his helmet it was just too obvious. I think had he just bumped him or grazed him w/o leading with his helmet no penalty would have been called.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:38 am to lsutigerfan1976
it was a joke and did seem like a make up call
intent, wtf
intent, wtf
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:38 am to tigerjunior
It's a bullshite call. If intent is the reason for a flag then there should be flags on every play. Intent allows for a huge canvas for calls. Just call what happens, not intent. Since when are officials mind readers or quasipsychiatrists? Another sign of the pussification of football.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:39 am to TorNation
quote:
If you admit he grazed him plus they were out of bounds plus he was leading with his helmet it was just too obvious. I think had he just bumped him or grazed him w/o leading with his helmet no penalty would have been called.
This makes no sense.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:39 am to TorNation
Announcers are ALWAYS wrong. The call had nothing to do with intent.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:39 am to lsutigerfan1976
I think you could move the chains on a lot of dropped passes too. The WRs intent was to catch them!
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:39 am to lsutigerfan1976
That call was terrible and could have changed the outcome of the game.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:40 am to TorNation
quote:
If you admit he grazed him plus they were out of bounds plus he was leading with his helmet it was just too obvious. I think had he just bumped him or grazed him w/o leading with his helmet no penalty would have been called.
The point is they should have let that slide. Think if your hand grazes the other person's helmet. Are referees going to interpret that as you meant to drag someone down by the facemask? It is not the refs job to interpret intent. It is their job to say, did they do something wrong? That is it. Not what your intentions were.
This post was edited on 10/14/12 at 10:43 am
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:41 am to Grooler
quote:
That call was terrible
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:42 am to lsutigerfan1976
quote:
Since when do you start calling penalties on intent?
Are people assuming this was the reasoning for the call just bc Herbtreit said it on air??
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:44 am to STEVED00
quote:
Are people assuming this was the reasoning for the call just bc Herbtreit said it on air??
What other explanation is there?
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:45 am to lsutigerfan1976
how about negative intent.
I didn't intend to be offside.
or I din't intend to move and have a flase start.
or i didn't intend to chop block, it just happened.
Kind of getting like our judges and judical system with make the law on the fly.
I didn't intend to be offside.
or I din't intend to move and have a flase start.
or i didn't intend to chop block, it just happened.
Kind of getting like our judges and judical system with make the law on the fly.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:45 am to Tiger Authority
quote:
What other explanation is there?
Official just made a bad call.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:46 am to lsutigerfan1976
This whole leading with your helmet thing is a slippery slope. Of course you lead with your helmet with tackling someone. It's at the top ouf your body? Should he lead with his feet?
It's a contact sport. I understand using the helmet as a weapon, but what I saw last night didn't look like an intent to do anything but hit the guy out of bounds by extening yourself in preparation of contact. Like most things, it's gone from a reasonable rule to stop malicious damage to a player to a witch hunt.
It's a contact sport. I understand using the helmet as a weapon, but what I saw last night didn't look like an intent to do anything but hit the guy out of bounds by extening yourself in preparation of contact. Like most things, it's gone from a reasonable rule to stop malicious damage to a player to a witch hunt.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:46 am to STEVED00
quote:
Official just made a bad call.
Well that's the right answer.
Posted on 10/14/12 at 10:50 am to Tiger Authority
Happened to Loston last year when he launched over a player and never made contact
Was flagged for it
Was flagged for it
Popular
Back to top

10





