Started By
Message
re: Alabama suing painter for Alabama Football Paintings
Posted on 2/2/12 at 1:16 pm to dapado33
Posted on 2/2/12 at 1:16 pm to dapado33
quote:
Does this same rule apply to photographers who take photos during a game and sell it to the AP and other media organizations?
They are issued press passes. In other words- permitted.
Posted on 2/2/12 at 1:43 pm to Swoopin
quote:So could someone with a press pass snap a photo, then paint the image they captured and sell prints?
They are issued press passes. In other words- permitted.
Or could Daniel Moore purchase the rights to a photo taken by someone with a press pass, paint it, then distribute copies (basically what a newspaper does except instead of printing the photo in a newspaper, he's painting it on canvas)?
It just seems like the trademark rules shouldn't apply in this case. Don't they normally only apply when a consumer could be confused as to who manufactured the product? Ex: It's not ok to sell non-Polo shirts with a Polo logo on them, but it would be acceptable if a lawyer used a photo of himself in an ad, and he happened to be wearing a Polo shirt in the photo.
Posted on 2/6/12 at 6:50 pm to Swoopin
So why don't they license him again and make profits from his paintings? Then everyone's happy
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News